398 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 52 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Diary   

Mayan Math - PART 5 - Fractals


Drew Terry
Message Andrew Terry

just as 

 

2 x 240  =  480, 

 

480/2160 = 2/9 ; 

 

720/9 x 2 = 160; 

 

160 x 3 = 480

 

because it’s cycle within a cycle [24 + 36  =  60].

 

In that case, 7920  =  [16.5 x 480]

 

and 

 

2,160 =  [4.5 x 480]

 

or total of [21 x 480]

 

while 

 

7,920 - 12 x 480  =  2,160, 

 

2,640/7,920  =  1/3 ; 

 

2,640/2,160  =  11/9 ; 

 

2,160/6,480  =  1/3 ; 

 

2,640/7,920  =  1/3 ; 

 

2,640/5,280  =  1/2

 

which defines 12 months of a year or 12 lunar cycles within one solar cycle [inertial cycles, because non-inertial cycles are 13 as in Mayan cosmology, for example].

 

72 is solar and 48 is lunar cycle [again more in the book].

 

11/9^-1  =  99 ; 11/3^-1  =  33

 

Difference between earth and lunar size is 12-fold lunar rotation around earth [motion in between as line of symmetry between their different sizes]. 

 

So far that simple ratio of sizes have determined precessional and perihelion motion, as well as number of lunar orbitals per one earth orbital and number of rotations per orbital.

 

Furthermore, 11 x 480  =  5280 [line of symmetry], 

 

11 x 480 = 5280 ;

 

which is number of feet per mile or 720º x 7º20', 

 

5280/720 = 22/3 ; 5280/2 x 3 = 7920

 

therefore 720 x 7.333 [difference between 20 and 3.333.. is difference between hexadecimal and/or decimal system , i.e. difference between exclusively spatial and/or space/time reality, which is 6 vs. 10 harmonics respectively, as discussed above].

 

In that case, earth diameter is [1.5 x 5280], 

 

while moon’s diameter is [1/2 x 5280 - 480] [inertia].

 

7920/720 = 11 ; 7920/22 = 360 ; 

 

5280/2-480 = 2160 ; 

 

480/720 = 2/3

 

Furthermore, 5280/3.666 [3.666… - ratio between lunar/solar orbital or 7920/2160] 

 

5280/7920/2160  =  1/3240 ; 1/3240/2  =  1/6480 ; 

 

1/3240 x 9/10  =  1/3600 ; 1/3600/10^-1  =  1/360

 

is 1440 or number of minutes in one day, 

 

7920/2160  =  11/3 ; 2640/7920/2160  =  1/6480 ; 

 

while [2640/7920/2160]  =  1/6480 

 

=  which is inversion of 6480 [1/4 precession or quantum of time], 

 

7920/2640  =  3

 

where 2640 is ½ of 5280.

 

360^-1  =  1/360

 

At the same time

 

[5,280/7,920/2,160 = 3,240]

 

or ½ of 6,480, 

 

where 

 

[3,240 =  324 x 10]

 

and 

 

[324 = 0.9 x 360]

 

or

 

[360 / 1.111]

 

Also:

 

[2,160 x 1.22... = 2,640]

 

and

 

[1 / 1.22 = 0.8181…]

 

or recursion of ratio between earth and lunar density 

 

[81 = 9²] or [3^4].

 

While [720 x 7.333... = 5,280]

 

[720 x 7.2 = 5184 = 1/4 orbital precession]

 

or [2 x 48 = 96] inertial difference

 

in between [4/3 x 72]. 

 

[7.5 x 720 = 5,400] 

 

or

 

[¼ of 21,600-year period]

 

inertial cycle of 20,736-year cycle

 

or 864 inertial difference in between, 

 

which is 1/100 of 86,400 sec per day that translates into

 

216 or [6 x 6 x 6] inertial difference 

 

between 5,400 and 5,184 years 

 

or 

 

[¼ of rotation as its singular quantum, reduced by a factor 100].

 

Similarly,

 

[7.22…x 720 = 5,200-year period]

 

or 

 

16 years [4²] difference from perfect 5,184 year period, 

 

while 

 

[7.111… x 720 = 5,120] 

 

or 64 years difference

 

[2/3 of 96], [8/9 of 72] etc. 

 

[333 - 222 = 111] – 3D 

 

in context of its 2D inertial difference is self-same repetition [111…].

 

Infinite self-same recursion within is 7D surface without [days per week].

 

A singular quantum of time is

 

 5,120 years +5 ¼ discrepancy [inertion or incoherence, eccentricity etc.], 

 

that’s 5 ¼ days above perfect 360-day’s year [non-inertial wave].

 

It’s recursive 5125.25-year cycle of time. 

 

Once again Maya accuracy exceeds anything known in context of “modern” science, because they knew what we don’t.

 

Maya cycle is 20x13 = 260, 

 

which is 20 fold recursion in context of 13-fold recursion, 

 

which is 6+6 = 12 in context of inertial here and now 

 

in between or total of 13 surfaces.

 

260-fold cycle is 1/100 of 26,000-year precessional cycle, 

 

just as it’s human gestation period,

 

260 x 100 = 26,000

 

whose subsequent lifespan is 

 

[100 x 260 days] or 72 years.

 

26,000/360/72 = 325/324

 

325 x 26/36 = 4225/18

 

360 x 4225/18 = 84500

 

84,500/86400 = 845/864

 

And it’s not a coincidence that [260 / 360]  =  0.7222…,

 

just as is not a coincidence that:

 

72 heartbeats per minute amounts to 26000 [25920] in 6 hrs

 

72 x 60 x 6 = 25920

 

[1/4 day] or 

 

25,920 x 4 = 103,680

 

25,920/103,680 = 1/4

 

103,680 x 5/4 = 129,600

 

129,600 per day [double curvature or 360²].

 

It’s as above so below, because all is one.

 

Time in context of past curvature is space in context of future curvature 

 

[and/or gravity of its successive curvature].

 

25,920 years of time is [25,920 x 10² km ] in space

 

[one day of orbital motion or 30 km/sec x 86,400 sec].

 

Likewise – 25,920 light years between earth and core of galaxy [spatial size] is 

 

25,920 years in time [duration of precessional motion].

 

Just as 25,920 light years is 6,480-fold distance between earth and nearest star [4 light years], 

 

so is period of time 4 x 6,480 years [curvature].

 

And distance to nearest star is equally 

 

6480-fold multiplication of Pluto’s orbital 

 

that’s 40-fold multiplication of earth’s orbital 

 

[40 AU x 6480  = 259,200 AU,

 

where 1AU = 500 sec or 8.333 min,

 

hence [259,200 x 500 = 129,600,000 sec]

 

or 1,500 days, which is 4.1666 years].

 

Moreover – orbital x inverse rotational velocity of earth is 

 

[30 x 2.16 = 64.8]

 

30 x 2.16  =  324/5

 

 or [1/100 of 6480]. 

 

100/5 x 324  =  6480

 

6480-fold recursion is boundary of rotation in context of orbital! 

 

6480/5 x 4  =  5184

 

5184/5  =  1296

 

1296/324 x 5  =  20

 

Beyond such point that ratio changes instantly [quantum leap] to a new resonant frequency.

 

And so on and so forth – fractality is infinity of infinite curvatures of a singular source.

 

Before conclusion, let’s see why 7-fold recursion is different from all others.

 

It’s because every infinity of space is reduced to finite curvature in time and/or vice versa – except 7. 

 

i.e. inversion of infinite 0.3333 recursion is finite [whole] 3, 

 

infinite 0.222… is 4.5, infinite 0.444… is 2.25 etc, 

 

but 0.777… is in its inversion 1.285714286… [transcendental number].

 

Simultaneously – 0.777…/0.333… = 0.259259 

 

or recursive 259 sequence, which is time of space [boundary] 

 

or 25920 years of time, because 0.777…+0.333… = 1.111…. 

 

i.e. it’s the same 260-fold sequence of 13x20 when reduced to 2D sequence [space/time duality].

 

In other words – number 7 is true line of symmetry of 10 recursive harmonics, which is 6 harmonics within and 3 harmonics without in context of inertial 7 in between or line of symmetry between singularity and duality [infinity].

 

According to the formula of the pendulum, the length of the string can be calculated:


L  =  T2  x  g / 4pi2 ,

 

where T is the duration of the pendulum back and forth, g is the gravitational acceleration on earth, pi is the proportional number of the diameter and circumference of a circle.


The length of a pendulum, that correspond [scaled down] to the 24th. octave of a tropical year, is about 88 cm. and oscillates in 1.88 sec. 

 

[A pendulum of a fourth or four times this length does so as well].

 

frequency, which is 1 / 31556925.97..  =  0.000000031..Hz. 

 

This frequency shall then be multiplied by 2, until the octave note reach the range of hearing.

 

[32 x 2] = the audible frequency is equal to 1/ length of period x 232  

 

=  tone frequency of a tropical year  =  136.10221…Hz.  

 

This frequency is slightly  below the note C# [C sharp] in the chromatic scale. 


About 40 octaves higher one obtains the matching frequency of the visible range.

 

The two geometric progressions in which the ratios between the terms is 2:1 and 3:1, respectively:


1-2-4-8 and 1-3-9-27.

 

Combining this two progressions, Plato produced the seven-termed series: 1-2-3-4-8-9-27. The numbers in this series contains the octave, the octave and a fifth, the double octave, the triple octave, the fifth, the fourth and the whole tone.

 

The entire compass from one to twenty-seventh multiple comprises therefore four octaves and a major sixth. In numerical terms it contains four octaves, 16:1  x  3:2 [a fifth]  x   9:8 [a whole-tone] = 27:1

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Drew Terry Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The only power we have is the power we give away.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend