Revolutionary state power and socialist society won't be able to stop storms and natural disasters. But it would be able respond to them in radically different ways than this system does. At the same time, responding to the crisis, protecting lives, and bringing relief--in ways that contribute to advancing the revolution's overall goals of uprooting all class and social divisions, here and around the world--would pose contradictions and challenges.
As we mentioned in Part I of this series, the major means of production--factories, land, resources, etc.--would now be in the hands of society as a whole in the form of state ownership. Economic development would be centrally planned while giving great scope to local initiative. In addition to advancing the world revolution and protecting the environment, the new socialist economy would be guided by meeting social needs, which the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America (CNSRNA) describes as
creating a common material wealth that contributes to the all-around development of society and the individuals who make it up, and overcoming oppressive divisions between mental and manual labor, town and country, different regions and nationalities, and men and women.
In the case of natural disasters, this would mean a number of things. One would involve long-term efforts to transform cities, towns, and transportation systems to be environmentally sustainable. This would include working to minimize vulnerabilities to natural disasters and devoting resources to preparing for them ahead of time should they occur--not a last-minute chaotic dash to warn people, move supplies, etc.!
But it would take time and much ferment and debate over how--and even whether--to implement these radical steps. And the new revolutionary society would not have unlimited resources to respond.
However, the new state would have overall control of economic resources, and an orientation of unleashing and relying on the most dynamic factor in society--the creativity and initiative of the masses of people--as part of a collective process aimed at more deeply involving them in the governing of the new society and strengthening the bonds between people. Also providing real-time and ongoing relief commensurate with the level of the disaster would be a social priority--which would not be shaped by the imperatives, constraints, and objectives of a capitalist system.
During disasters, there have been many instances of people spontaneously putting aside their individual concerns and coming to the aid of others. Under socialism, this spirit will be amplified and given leadership and backing by the state, the revolutionary communist vanguard, and other elements of society, rather than being constrained and even suppressed. Students, technicians, scientists, and other volunteers from all over would be encouraged to come to the aid of those in the hardest hit areas and work and wrangle together with them over how to solve problems and how best to cut through the obstacles.
Compare this to the heartrending story of what happened to Lumberton. After the devastation of Hurricane Matthew, many of the town's residents and its local government--including from south Lumberton, the poorest, mostly African-American precinct--tried to plan ahead. They worked extraordinarily hard to prevent disaster ahead of the storm and then rescue people. But their efforts weren't backed by the system--they were blocked or largely ignored! Federal government aid was never distributed, as we mentioned above. Residents wanted to build floodgates to block a railroad underpass through which water flooded during Matthew. In response, the railroad threatened legal action, and the state government did nothing until the last moment. Even then, the railroad tried to physically prevent residents from temporarily blocking the passage. People also hurriedly built massive levees, but they were breached by record-high floodwaters. One local official estimates that half of south Lumberton's 2,000 residents won't return.2
In the new socialist society, during disasters, those who had been incarcerated (justly, through a radically different legal system and process) would not be left in terror or to die--like many prisoners are in this putrid society. This could be controversial among the formerly oppressed because some of those locked up may well have carried out serious outrages against the masses of people. There could also be real difficulties involved in getting prisoners, along with everyone else, to safety. So struggle may have to be carried out to win people to the orientation that revenge, retaliation, or retribution shouldn't enter into the new society's approach to this, or any other, challenge facing it. Why? Because this works against--and leads someplace completely different than--the emancipation of all of humanity; it leads back to the horrors of the world and the system we live under and suffer under today.
Another dimension of dealing with natural disasters that would be radically different would be in relation to oppressed peoples. Under the CNSRNA, special and extra assistance would be provided to African American, Latino, and other formerly oppressed peoples who could still be hit harder by natural disasters thanks to this capitalist-imperialist system's legacy. Immigrants and refugees will be welcomed and unleashed to play a vital role in the continuing transformation of society, not terrorized.3 And this would further a key overall goal spelled out in the CNSRNA of "overcoming historic inequalities":
The state in the New Socialist Republic in North America and the planned economy under its direction take special measures for "raising the bottom up." This principle serves the crucial task of overcoming historic inequalities affecting the formerly oppressed nationalities, and other profound disparities in society. The whole of society will be mobilized to overcome these inequalities. Priorities in distribution of needed social goods and services (like health and housing) will be guided by this principle. The socialist economy also gives priority to overcoming gaps between the more developed regions and areas and the less developed.
Given the racism and white supremacy that has been so deeply baked into today's society--economically, politically, socially, culturally, and ideologically--this would require political and ideological struggle to win growing millions to understand, support, and become directly involved in these efforts.
The revolutionary state and society would aim to give leadership to turn this into a positive process, raising people's consciousness about the history of national oppression and its deep connections with this oppressive system overall, break down barriers, and forge new ties between people, but this would be a very contradictory, tumultuous process.
________________
1. Fully analyzing the driving forces behind current state budget deficits and such budget cuts is beyond the scope of this article. But they, too, stem most fundamentally from the predatory workings of capitalism-imperialism and the distorted, profit-driven priorities it enforces. They also often result from the bitter struggle within the ruling class, a struggle that has led to the empowering of the Trump/Pence fascist regime, over which governing and social contract best serves the needs of imperialism today. For a relevant analysis, see "The Shutdown, the Showdown, and the Urgent Need To Repolarize... For Revolution," revcom.us, October 19, 2013.
2. Doug Bock Clark, "Two Years After a Devastating Hurricane, a North Carolina Town Is Again at the Center of the Flood," New Yorker, September 18, 2018
3. See "H. Immigrants, Citizenship and Asylum," Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, authored by Bob Avakian, pp. 60-63.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
