Any party of five has the
right of initiatives.
The realization of suggestions impels seeking allies and go to compromises. The
decision can be taken at the half of the votes. If the solution is blocked by
another half, the right of the new edition and the 2-votes advantage go to the
leader of the second (regarding the number of voters) party.
In case of repeated lock,
either:
1. The 2-votes advantage on the current theme goes to the communicator with a new alternative, which is supported by at least one participant from each block, or by mutual agreement. The conflict can be resolved using the Edgeworth Method with the participation of thematic experts of 5 sides only. Any of the leaders has the right to abandon the decision.
2. Final lock. The one provoking regular locks loses the right for initiatives, the three least (for the number of voters) parties can be updated from a reserve.
The three least parties are not enough in order to take separate initiatives'. Control of "taken decision" is implemented by participants outside the resolution.
Two- or three party alliance, that exceeded half of
all decisions and locks, may claim only for one place in the future team. At
least one vacancy in it belongs to 6 new contenders from the non-ruling
parties.
Only one of them is "the entrance ticket" to the Elections for the ruling party, a protege may declare himself off the
Elections along with the curator only. It is possible for a trainee to
participate as an advisor. The team going to Power for the first time can not
be reorganized from functionaries of the ruling parties.
Advertising of the ruling parties' is prohibited, their campaign can be
supported with the work done only, opposition may publish an unaccepted version
through the mass media. The advertising campaign of new parties can not be financed
from private sources and state funds are distributed equally among the
contenders.
A ballot paper has 2 columns: Ruling Parties in descending order by the
realized solutions rate only (an initiator earns two points, partners receive
one, lock withdraws one and two respectively) and new ones, each presents its
three basic purposes. If the voter trusts a former "mon ami", he puts
"YES"; if not, then he selects the new one with the most needfull
priorities. He also has the right to say "NO" to the most negative of
the ruling parties. The negative evaluation may take away up to half of the
positive votes.
The final grade of the "Old Fighters" in the elections is different
between "FOR" and "AGAINST" votes, multiplied by the
efficiency index (the ratio between implemented decisions and all the decisions
taken) and the average objectivity index (the ratio of the parties who made the
decision to their total number of 5). The parties not involved into decision
making will have the objectivity index 1. For the party of lowest
participation, its protege and a free candidate, the results will be increased
by the reverse usefulness index (that is a ratio of a difference
"FOR" votes "AGAINST" votes to "FOR" votes) of
the leading four. If the usefulness index of the outsider is higher than the
average index of the four, the outsider gets two vacancies in the new team for
the outsider itself and its educatee, if the index is lower he gives off his
vacancy to the leading alliance.
The voter is free to include one own candidate!
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
3
