Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 63 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

On Liberalism, American Conservatism and Reactionary neo-Conservatism: exploiting ambiguous nomenclature

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment

Yaybob
Message Frederick

So, today in 2008, you have tens of millions of deceived and unsophisticated Americans who are liberals and don’t know it, and who are decrying liberalism and chanting for a society free of liberalism. They themselves are liberal just for believing, unlike the Neocons, in freedom, equality and democracy. They have no grasp of the fact that the liberal-free state that they champion resembles Gitmo or the Tower of London, where freedom and rights are nonexistent. And they cannot at this time be made to see otherwise by any means known to me. They are programmed to distrust us self-avowed liberals however cogent our arguments, and I’m afraid that the corporatists have already succeeded in their quest to capture our government. They could drop the charade tomorrow and just declare martial law, which would also be acceptable to the deceived for a time. But a brutal and oppressive regime a la the Nazis would finally lead to resistance even from the ditto head contingent. None of that is necessary. A gradual transformation and consolidation of the remainder of our government functions and economy can be effected stealthily allowing these plutocratic corporatists to go about their business with a minimum of resistance, police or prisons.

Just as a final thought, self-described conservative Americans, also known as the classical, laissez-faire liberals are just beginning to realize that there is something very wrong with the Republican Party. Like we liberals who have mostly disavowed the Democratic Party, they are beginning to distance themselves from the Republicans. This was manifest as an unusually robust Ron Paul candidacy, the man who for many on the right served the same charismatic, even messianic role for conservatives that the Obama candidacy has thus far provided for the left. As a result, the classical liberals, formerly self-described Republicans, are beginning to call themselves Libertarians in order to distinguish and distance themselves from the Bush type of politicians and operatives, a change which will further muddy the waters of political nomenclature.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Frederick "Yaybob" Ziffel Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The author is a fifty-something year old physician soon to be expatriated.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

THE HISTORY OF PLAYING CARDS

THREE GREAT LIES

THREE TYPES OF CONSERVATIVES

ARE THE NEOCONS REALLY PATHOLOGICAL LIARS AND THIEVES?

On Liberalism, American Conservatism and Reactionary neo-Conservatism: exploiting ambiguous nomenclature

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING ...

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend