399 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 77 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/10/09

Pornography: Free Speech or Stylized Abuse?

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments, In Series: Feminism

Amy Fried, Ph.D.
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Amy Fried, Ph.D.
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

"In the language of the legislature, 'pornography is central in creating and maintaining sex as a basis of discrimination. Pornography is a systematic practice of exploitation and

subordination based on sex, which differentially harms women. The bigotry and

contempt it produces, with the acts of aggression it fosters, harm women's

opportunities for equality and rights [of all kinds].' Yet this simply demonstrates

the power of pornography as speech."

Much of MacKinnon's argument is based on studies that show that women who "choose" prostitution and pornography are often victims of childhood sexual abuse. The result is often a downward spiral of re-living trauma, complicated by poverty. The fact that the law sees them as criminals, rather than victims, reinforces their dependence on pimps and other oppressors. She notes that acts similar to those done to women in pornography - e.g., the infamous Abu Ghraib sexual humiliation photos - are seen as abuse when not done to women, and not labeled as pornography.

Of course, no one can argue that animals make such a choice in films that (sickeningly) sexualize animal cruelty.

Conservatism obsesses about the sins of sexuality. In response, we liberals obsess about freedom. But do lofty theories about art and freedom blind us to the real life harm that is done behind the camera?

Recently, I had an on-air conversation with Thom Hartmann on this very topic. He had been equating conservatism with an uptight attitude towards pornography. I pointed out that pornography can do real harm to women. To his credit, he agreed.

MacKinnon's accounts of the cruelty surrounding pornography are heart-breaking. Adams' parallels between cruelty to women and animals are eye-opening. Women are often caught between conservatives who blame the victims, and liberals who see choice in choicelessness. Animal suffering is often dismissed by both.

I ask my fellow liberals to look beyond the camera, and acknowledge the suffering that may lie there.



Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Amy Fried, Ph.D. Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Amy Fried applies her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior to writing and activism on church-state separation, feminism, reproductive rights, corruption, media and veganism.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

What Makes a Good Leader?

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Old Enough to be Raped

FILM REVIEW: Half the Sky: A Must-See Problem, A Flawed Solution

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend