Let's face it. I like Dick Armey, but I also feel taken in and used as ammunition against Chuck Grassley. Perhaps Armey's battle against the Mortgage Bailout bill is the larger battle in his eyes, but when means and methods are not justified, are they really doing any favor for the ends? If opposition to the bill is genuinely justified, then it should be able to stand on its own merits (and withstand vetting) in its own right, and it should not need to lean upon overblown fears of an unrelated provision in the bill.
Sheesh!!
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
