463 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 102 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 8/8/14

Summary of Adam Curtis Power of Nightmares Part 3

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   7 comments, In Series: The Power of Nightmares

Pal Palsimon
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Pal Palsimon
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

Just as the neocons had exaggerated the will and power of the Soviet Union to impose tyranny upon the world, they also exaggerated the power and extent of a network of terrorists attempting to impose their own tyranny on the world. In reality the Soviet Union was on its last legs, collapsing from within, and jihadists were, at the same time, losing influence in the world. And yet, the idea of neocons was that it was to be and should be "America's destiny to fight an epic battle against the forces of evil." Vincent Cannistraro, Head of Counter-terrorism CIA 1988-90 in interview also agreed on this position.

This myth became a reality in the minds of almost everyone on September 11, 2001 when the attack on the World Trade Center made the pervasive al-Queda threat seem even more real in the minds of Americans.

Curtis states that the actual "brainchild" of the WTO attack was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed [See Notes 3 and 4 Motive] who had gone to Osama in search of funds for the project. Before the attack George W. Bush publicly indicated he did not believe in going into other countries to force them to "live as we live."

But neocons, "in the wake of the panic" of World Trade Center, blamed the vast network of al-Queda for the crime".and Bush's rhetoric publicly changed. After the attack, he spoke of al-Queda, with the words "mafia as the terror and al-Queda the crime"". the work of "thousands of terrorists in more than 60 countries," and that the vast terror network recruited terrorists from all over the world, "brought to camps in places like Afghanistan, where they are trained in the tactics of terror."

Curtis says that this was the event that brought the neoconservatives back to power in America. Where Bush's administrators, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld had previously been ignored during the 1990s, (especially during the Clinton years) they now were able to show evidence of their predictions. These neocons had been working under the Reagan Administration 20 years before, and were now again appointed within the administration of George W.

Now Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Richard Perle began to lay plans for the response to the World Trade Center attack.

Richard Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon Defense Policy Board 2001-2003 in interview said the same struggle as they had against Soviet totalitarianism was the struggle they had with a "War on Terrorists," good vs evil. Both Russia and al-Queda wanted to impose an "intolerant tyranny upon all mankind" an Islamic universe in which we are compelled to accept their universe.."

Thus began the invasion of Afghanistan (See Notes 7 and 8). Americans allied with the Northern Alliance, fighting the Taliban. The neocons imagined and publicized the idea that Osama lived and worked out of fortress-like caves in the mountains of Afghanistan. These structures of many stories had all the comforts of home; computer systems, dormitories, offices, underground tunnels, and even places where large trucks could drive right in. Wolfowitz publicly stated that "there is not one of those, there are many of those." But no such elaborate structures were ever found, either by the Americans or the British.
According to Curtis, "The majority of these fighters had never had anything to do with bin-Laden or international terrorism." They were simply an Islamic group that wanted to impose Islamic governments in their own countries and were not part of an al-Queda organization. (See notes 7 and 8.) The Taliban consisted mainly of fighters from other countries being trained in Afghanistan, and, as foreigners, the Northern Alliance hated them, willingly took them prisoners and turned them over to Americans "as al-Queda members" in exchange for monetary reward. It did not matter to members of Northern Alliance whether or not they truly were associated with a network called al-Queda, as long as they were paid for turning them in. Once in hands of Americans they were either killed or taken to Guant????namo Bay.
Says Curtis: "The terrible truth is that there was nothing there [in the mountains of Tora Bora] because al-Queda as an organization didn't exist. The attacks on America had been planned by a small group that had come together around bin-Laden in the late nineties"... united by the idea of an extreme interpretation of Islamism developed by Zawahiri." In searching for an organization, Americans were chasing a fantasy and missing the "real threat."
Jason Burke, (See Note 1), interviewed said that there had been no organized group in Afghanistan, no cells, etc., and that all that was really there was an idea "prevalent among young, angry Muslim males throughout the Islamic world," and it is the idea which is the threat.
The neocons also began looking for this fantasy network in America. Paul Wolfowitz, (U. S. Deputy Secretary of Defense), stated publicly that the networks existed in over 60 countries around the world, including the United States and "we will do whatever it takes to dismantle them." (See Note 6 on Wolfowitz doctrines.) All branches of law and military were told to look for terrorists. Many people were arrested, and George W announced publicly that they had "thwarted" terrorists in "Buffalo, Seattle, Portland, Detroit, North Carolina, Tampa, Florida." David Cole, Professor of Law at Georgetown University said "they call them sleeper cells, but when you look at the details the facts just don't support that, and they have not proved that any group within the United States has plotted or engaged in any terrorist activity within the United States." The Curtis video gives examples of a number of flawed efforts to convict people based on flimsy, ridiculous evidence, and flawed analyses, and activities that could not be classified as "terrorist," so that they made not one successful case to prosecute any of them as terrorist cells. Nevertheless, the fantasy of terror was expedient, both in the U. S. and in Britain.
The British government also promoted the idea that there were terrorist cells waiting to attack. And yet, "of 664 people arrested under the Terrorism Act since September 11, 2001, none of them had been convicted of belonging to al-Queda. Only 3 people have been convicted of having any association with any Islamist groups, and none of them were convicted of being involved with a terrorist cause, but only for fund-raising and possessing Islamist literature. The majority of people convicted under the Terrorism Act since September 11, 2001 were actually members of Irish terrorist groups UBF or real IRA ". The video indicates some ridiculous British arrests and charges that could never amount to convictions.
Curtis says that while there are extreme Islamist theories that have inspired many violent actions around the world, the bombings in Madrid as an example, "This is not a new phenomena. What is new is the way Americans and other governments have transformed this complex and disperate threat into a simplistic fantasy of an organized web of uniquely powerful terrorists who may strike anywhere at any moment. But no one questions the fantasy because it served the interests of so many".." It even served the interests of the terrorists themselves. For example , take Abu Zubaydah (See note 9) who, under intense and frequent interrogation and severe torture, told interrogators of terrifying plots that al-Queda was preparing -- "some of which were copied from Hollywood movies." Zubaydah gave a lot of details that he thought would cause panic, such as plans to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge, mass transit, the Statue of Liberty, apartment buildings, banks, etc., and how they had a dreaded "dirty bomb" which could spread radiation throughout cities and cause many people to die.
Neocons publicly announced they had information that al-Queda had plans to do all these things, and the media also announced as if true that al-Queda might launch dirty bombs in America. Such announcements served the purpose of instilling fear in the public that tended to increase support for their war on terror. None of these threats could ever be confirmed, and, in fact, the testing of dirty bombs proved that, if such existed in hands of al-Queda, they would be almost harmless.
The neoconservatives used this panic and fear as they began a campaign against Iraq. George W announced fervently and publicly that his administration had evidence from various sources and from people "now in custody that Saddam Hussain aids and protects terrorists, including members of al-Queda." Richard Perle in an interview also adamantly insisted that there was good evidence that Saddam Hussain had assisted the 9/11 hijackers and that there was also evidence of links between Saddam and al-Queda to aid them in their activities. The fantasy took hold around the world and "transformed the very nature of politics" and gave neoconservative politicians "a new and heroic role in the world," as managers on the world stage to protect us from terror. The American and British foreign policy-makers began to advise that there was no need for real evidence of threats, but one must imagine the worse, (" a grand dark vision of imagined threats"), and do whatever necessary to prevent them. (See Note 10 on Permanent War or the Permanent Preparation for Permanent War)

Such policy was based on the same "precautionary principle" which came about as a consequence of the idea that we must prepare for the potential effects of climate change, even though we had not yet proven there would be any real threat to us. This principle in the political area, however, led to many breaches of constitutional rights of due process, for example, many arrests of people who had not committed any crimes, but who police suspected were "potential" criminals or "sleeper cells." The loss of the rights of due process was to become a sacrifice we should make because of these threats to our nation. It led to imprisonment of foreign nationals without trial, which is illegal under the European Convention.

Finally, many have come to believe that terrorists, such as al-Queda, do not actually threaten the existence of our nations, as would be a Hitler, and that the sacrifices being made to the political and social values we once believed in are not justified. Because of politics of fear we have lost those values, and now politicians give us nothing to believe in at all.

For our future in this context, see Notes 10 and 11.

NOTES

Note 1 Jason Burke In 2003, Burke wrote Al-Qaeda: Casting a Shadow of Terror, which was later updated and republished as Al-Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam. Noam Chomsky described it as the "best book there is" on Al-Qaeda.[4] He was interviewed in the 2004 BBC documentary The Power of Nightmares. In 2006, he wrote On the Road to Kandahar: Travels through Conflict in the Islamic World.

Note 2 [According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Queda. The Base "al-Queda is a global militant Islamist and Wahhabist organization founded by Osama bin Laden, Abdullah Azzam, [25][26] and several other militants,[27] at some point between August 1988[28] and late 1989,[27] with its origins being traceable to the Soviet war in Afghanistan.[29][30] It operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless army[31] and a radical Wahhabi Muslim movement calling for global jihad and a strict interpretation of sharia law.[32]It has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United Nations Security Council, NATO, the European Union, the United States, Russia, India and various other countries . Al-Qaeda has carried out many attacks ". ." ]

Note 3 - Responsibility for the September 11 attacks

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pal Palsimon Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Palsimon, formally educated in journalism & law, is an independent progressive activist & writer, focusing on guarding integrity of media & government. (.)


Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Champion Mortgage and Bank of America Foreclose Reverse Mortgages

How to Solve Racism

Summary of Adam Curtis Part 1 The Power of Nightmares

Constitutional Change (Political vs Economic Democracy)

Realistic Compromise Gun Legislation

A Revolution: Part III The Devil in Details.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend