Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 72 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

Is Obama a Self-Hating White? What Booker T & the MGs Have To Do With It

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments

Gregg Gordon
Message Gregg Gordon
I'll confess to being in the former camp, though I came to it slowly. We've been conditioned by advertising and fallen TV preachers to view any example of effective oratory as an empty con job. But there's more to substance than position papers for policy wonks, and I gradually began to see the substance in Obama. I thought his speech on race last week was probably the most remarkable political speech I've ever witnessed. I found it so honest, personal, forthright and courageous, I think it will one day be placed alongside the Emancipation Proclamation, the Brown Supreme Court decision, and King's "I Have a Dream" speech as a major turning point in America's racial story. And if that sounds silly now, the Gettysburg Address was not universally praised at first, either. Lincoln himself thought he blew it. Obama's speech was certainly the equal of John Kennedy's famous one on Catholicism, and probably surpassed it, if only because the racial divide has proven so much more intractable in this country than the religious one.

But to explain the other side, the almost visceral anti-Obama sentiment, I search in vain for a single sentence that could be criticized by anyone. I thought it must be frustrating for the pundits, for to quote the speech at all is to quote something important, insightful, and inspiring. On Fox News that night, Sean Hannity and Newt Gingrich dealt with it by endlessly replaying Rev. Wright's inflammatory rhetoric and then talking about it as if Obama's speech had never been delivered. I've heard other pundits criticize the speech by saying that while Obama did speak eloquently and effectively about the broader issues of race, he failed to sufficiently and personally rebuke his pastor. That's the pundit's way of saying, "Do sweat the small stuff."

Well, the right-wing talk radio hosts are going to flog this horse to the end. They'll ignore the facts they have to and invent the facts they must. That's what they do, and in this campaign especially, they have little else to work with. They can't hardly campaign on the economy and the war.

More disappointing is Hillary Clinton's campaign, which has all but openly stated their last-ditch strategy is to make Obama appear unelectable. The delegate math looks pretty impossible for them now, so what choice do they have (other than the unthinkable -- a graceful withdrawal)? I watched Bill Clinton this weekend not very subtly question Obama's patriotism, and the only thing I can give him credit for is that his heart didn't seem much in it. It must be painful for "the first black president" to stoop so low, and I feel his pain.

For me, the most telling part of Obama's speech was the part about his white grandmother, because it reminded us that while he is black, he is just as much white. In a way unusual among Americans -- and unique among prominent politicians -- he embodies the experiences of both groups, and he can relate to the perspectives, hopes, and fears of both. He sees the ways that both are right, and both are wrong, and he offers a way to bridge the gap.

Indeed, while by nature he is half-and-half, by nurture he is actually much more white, raised almost entirely by his white mother and grandparents, with the exception of his years in Indonesia in mostly white environments, finally attending mostly white colleges. Remember when the big question about Obama was whether he was "black enough"? Only as a fully-grown adult did he make the conscious choice to self-identify as a black man and immerse himself in the black community.

And now I think I'm starting to get it. There is some racism in the reaction to Obama, and some who would never admit to such will cling to any slender reed that gives a reason to vote against him. But the reaction from a greater number of whites, though it's visceral like racism, I think is more akin to the reaction of a spurned lover, the sour grapes reaction of one who, having taken the object of his desire to the most expensive restaurant, bought the most expensive bottle of wine, and put on the best display of his charms, is met with the response, "I'm not impressed."

Unlike the Steinbergs, Obama could never have "passed" for white. But he certainly could have been the smartest black guy in any room he chose to walk into. He could have remained "Barry" -- hell, stick an apostrophe in that last name and we'd all be buying him a Guinness. Countless others, with far fewer credentials, when offered the opportunity to enter a life of comfort and privilege, leapt at it, and I don't blame them.

But shown the lures of Wall Street, Obama chose those of Stoney Island Avenue on Chicago's grimy south side instead. That's an almost inexplicable choice for most white people to comprehend, so the decision that from almost anyone else would be seen as a laudable marker of self-sacrifice and character, from Obama is seen as a threat. It's a challenge to the system and all that it stands for, a challenge to all of our assumptions, a challenge to our own self-image of self-congratulatory, divinely-favored perfection.

And there's even more than that.

Almost 50 years ago, when Sammy Davis Jr. married a Swede, it got him disinvited to Kennedy's inaugural ball. They took the name "White House" seriously back then. Now Tiger Woods can do the same and no one cares. So you can't say we haven't made any progress.

But Obama married a black woman, and no "high yella" either, no Lena Horne, Vanessa Williams, or Halle Berry, no white man's fantasy of a black woman. But Michelle Obama seems as intelligent as she is beautiful, and like Obama's white mother, she's not afraid to stand on her own two feet. I bet that's what Barack fell in love with most of all, and how ironic. For centuries, the Great White Fear about black men was that they lusted after our women, and now we find ourselves threatened by one who apparently doesn't. I guess some black guys just can't win for losing.

So Obama's great audacity was not so much his hope but his decision to turn his back on a white world and choose to live in a much tougher black one, and even to join a black church, with a fiery pastor and a commitment to social justice. Of course Rev. Wright spoke out. He spoke out when he saw the jobs of his congregants being shipped to sweat shops overseas for the sake of an absentee landlord's quick buck. He spoke out when, for a generation, the world's wealthiest nation withdrew its resources from low-cost housing and schools for its least-advantaged citizens and put them into prisons instead. And he spoke out when insult was added to injury in the name of "welfare reform." He spoke out loudly, angrily, even shrilly. Who else was going to do it? Sean Hannity? Newt Gingrich? The whole sorry slew of Beltway pundits who now sit in his judgment?

It's obvious now that this election will be in large part about race as long as Obama's part of it. No matter that tent cities are springing up in Los Angeles, drawing desperate whites, blacks, and Hispanics alike, in the wake of the home mortgage crisis. No matter that these same people are being handed the bill to bail out the very Wall Street millionaires who ripped them off in the first place. No matter that the dollar is crumbling or that the ice sheets are melting. No matter that our kids are dying in the midst of the most naked land-and-resources-grab since we stole half of Mexico (which the anti-American Abraham Lincoln also denounced and then was relegated to the political wilderness for a decade. The more things change . . .). It's a testament to the power of race in America that it surmounts even all that.

It will be difficult for Obama, and even more so for his family, but that's the price of a public life. I'm sure those Wall Street partnerships are still yours for the asking if you want one, Barack.

But race it is, and I say, "Bring it on." I'm ready to tear every last, ugly, pus-filled, racial scab off this nation's body politic and see what lies beneath. Let's see what we're made of. Let's see who we really are as a people.

Let's see if we can "pass."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Gregg Gordon Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Gregg Gordon is a writer, musician, activist, and otherwise ne'er-do-well in Columbus, Ohio. "Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little." - Edmund Burke
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How a Surge "Works"

Why I Didn't Buy A Dell, Dude: An Open Letter to the Eighth Richest Man in America

So the War Isn't Gonna Be an Issue, eh?

Is Obama a Self-Hating White? What Booker T & the MGs Have To Do With It

Those Crazy Kagans, America's War-Lovingest Family

And the Band Played On: Al Gore, the Nobel Prize, and Holocaust Deniers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend