Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 61 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 7/7/22
  

How Rigged "Free Markets" Shackle and Plunder Most Americans

By       (Page 3 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Walter Uhler
Message Walter Uhler
Become a Fan
  (18 fans)

"The New Deal thereby shifted leverage from employers to employees and facilitated the growth of in the labor movement from fewer than 3 million members in 1932 to more than 15 million in 1945" (Ibid., p.24). One breakthrough result was the so-called 1950 Treaty of Detroit, in which automobile manufacturers gave union workers not only a 20 percent raise, but also defined benefit pensions and comprehensive health care coverage -- all in return for labor peace. (Ibid.). Other industries would negotiate similar deals.

New Dealers also created a large welfare state to benefit the poor. They did so by raising the marginal tax rate on the wealthiest Americans to 75 percent in 1935, and raised it further, during World War II, to 91 percent. "To the poor, the federal government offered a range of welfare programs, from social security to pensions, on the one hand, to aid to dependent children, on the other, that it had not made available before" (Ibid., p. 25).

Although the New Deal substantially shifted wealth from the rich to the middle class, working class, and the poor, it did comparatively little to improve the lives of Black Americans. Why? Because southern white supremacists in Congress crafted New Deal legislation to insure that it would be distributed locally, which in the South meant distribution by local white supremacists only to applicants possessing white skin. FDR needed their votes, so he went along with the racist scheme. Ira Katznelson exposed this wealth-debilitating racial discrimination against Blacks in his book, When Affirmative Action Was White.

Nevertheless, insofar as the Soviet Union competed with the United States for the hearts and minds of people in the so-called Third World, its propaganda about widespread American racism -- including such matters as "black accident victims dying because no white hospital in the South would admit them, and African diplomats being refused access to white restaurants and washrooms while traveling south of the Mason-Dixon line" (p. 50) -- provoked the American foreign policy establishment "to demonstrate through deeds a commitment to dismantling segregation to achieve racial equality. The Cold War was helping to make civil rights a paramount issue in America" (Ibid).

Although persistent and heroic actions taken by civil rights activists were always the driving force behind the country's civil rights successes, Professor Gerstle gives some credit to such Soviet propaganda. For example, he believes that the Supreme Court's decision to strike down segregation, in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, was motivated, in part, by Soviet propaganda. (Ibid., p. 51).

With the Cold War having helped thrust America's race problem into sharp relief, it was President Lyndon Baines Johnson who, after expanding upon FDR's New Deal with his Great Society programs, took on the pressing social issue of racial discrimination. One need not diminish the indispensable impetus provided by America's civil rights activists to credit the Johnson administration with pushing for and signing both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Equally important, however, was Johnson's signature on executive order 11246, described by Professor Gerstle as "a vast project of social engineering: the elimination of racial, religious, and sexual bias from all institutions, public and private, that received significant amounts of federal funds. This program came to be known as affirmative action" (Ibid., p. 54).

Professor Gerstle's interpretation of events in the United States for the century spanning from 1920 to 2020 is shaped by a concept that he calls the "political order." According to Gerstle, a political order emerges when the ideas propagated by one political party are retained by the opposition party. Thus, the first political order, the order of FDR's New Deal, was established when the Republicans refused to repudiate it after they took control of congress in 1946 and after Dwight D. Eisenhower became president in 1952.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Walter Uhler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Walter C. Uhler is an independent scholar and freelance writer whose work has been published in numerous publications, including The Nation, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Journal of Military History, the Moscow Times and the San (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Grand Jury Report: Part two of "What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it?"

Three False Assertions by the Grand Jury turned the Press and Public against Joe Paterno and Penn State

New, Previously Suppressed Grand Jury Testimony and Joe Paterno: Part four of "What did Joe Paterno know and when...

What did Joe Paterno know and when did he know it? Part One

Incompetent Journalists at the Philadelphia Inquirer Slandered Joe Paterno

Hitting Penn State's Board of Trustees Where it Hurts

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend