US DHS assists in suppression of anti-corruption dissent in Israel

Consequently, Moshe sued police and other State agencies, to get his computers back.

The State's response provides unique documentation of the fraudulent practices of police and the courts: Public Service Employee's Certificate, filed by the State with its response, documented in detail the practice of issuing sham/simulated warrants (Figure 5) - a court, where search and seizure warrant requests are routinely processed with no court files, no index of cases, and no valid warrant records. A court system, where judges routinely conduct such proceedings on search warrant requests by police, should be deemed a fraudulent operation under the guise of the rule of law.

Sham /simulated, fraudulent draconian civil judgment against Lory Shem Tov and Moti Leybel by Magistrate Avi Cohen.

Figures 6 : Hava Klein v Lori Shem Tov and Moti Leybel (621-02-16) in the Tel-Aviv Magistrate Court -- sham/ simulated, draconian, NIS 800,000, April 17, 2016 " Post-it Judgment" record, issued by Tel-Aviv Magistrate Avi Cohen against Lory Shem Tov and Moti Leybel ." As requested, judgment is herein rendered against Defendants 1+2, according to the content of the attached record." The "Post-it Judgment" is unsigned, was never duly served, and appear s neither in the Court's docket nor in the Judgment Index . [ix]

_______

In yet another serious episode of retaliation by the courts through fraud, Tel-Aviv Magistrate Avi Cohen purported to enter a n April 17, 2016 j udgment in the sum of NIS 800,000 against Lory Shem Tov and her colleague Moti Leybel in favor of Attorney Hava Kein (Figures 6) . Judgment of such sum could financially ruin the Defendants.

However, the draconian judgment was issued as an unsigned "Post-it Judgment" - standard fraud in Net-HaMishpat - IT system of the Israeli courts . Moreover, the judgment exceeded over 10-fold the Magistrate's judicial authority (NIS 75,000). In later court filing, Lory also claimed that the complaint had never been served on her, and that she had never been given the opportunity to file a response. She first heard of the case, when the draconian judgment was reported by gleeful media . [x]

The judgment has since been voided.

Fake/simulated court records are common in all Israeli courts today, including some of the highest public policy cases, pertaining to government corruption... [xi]

Shem Tov and Leybel are among many, who protest the unreasonable practices of Israeli welfare agencies and the family courts. In a 2013 Knesset (parliament) hearing, Judge (ret) Hanna Ben-Ami appeared and stated that she was the only judge hearing such cases in Jerusalem for several years. She described a system, where she had to rely on welfare workers ' statements , which were often inaccurate or false. In one extreme case, which she described, welfare workers asked to conduct the court hearing regarding the children in the mother's absence, claiming that she was violent. Ben-Ami explained that she resolved the problem by having the mother participate by video conference from another room. It turned out that the mother was not only no n- violent, but feeble... Moreover, when the welfare workers realized that Ben-Ami was not siding with them, they raised the argument that if the children wouldn't be taken from the mother, "the northern district adoption project would collapse ". [xii] Ben-Ami 's statement was repeatedly interrupted, and never managed to completed it ...

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).