This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
That's quite different 'scenario,' isn't it; different from that in Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt? Is it really legitimate to hide it all under one single "Color Revolutions" label?
Look at Cuba: decades and decades of terror against this marvelous island! Passenger airplanes being blown out of the sky. Countless assassination plots against its leaders. Chemical warfare, biological warfare, the bombing of cafes, restaurants, and hotels. All proven and documented. And constant attempts to recruit, radicalize Cuban citizens - to force them against their own government.
Venezuela, a nation that offered tremendous hope to the entire divided continent. Venezuela compassionate, brave, built on solidarity. Look what has been done to her. One coup attempts after another. Embargos. Recruitment of treasonous cadres. Attacks from neighboring Colombia. Another "Color Revolution?" Or merely a campaign of terror?
Hong Kong: a city, former British colony, which has been 'sacrificed' by the West, while literally converted into a battleground against the most optimistic country on Earth - China. There, the symbol used to be umbrellas, not colors. Now, there seems to be no symbol, whatsoever, just spite and violence and hate.
It is easy to understand that somehow the label of "Color Revolutions" is trivializing everything.
I am surprised that some conspiracy theorists did not come up with a scheme, yet, that would say that the very term - "Color Revolutions" - has been invented to belittle what has been done to the world by the imperialist West. To throw everything to one bag, and to confuse everything.
*
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
4
2
2
