575 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 44 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Sci Tech   

Jerry Mander's eight attitudes toward technology

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments

Katie Singer
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Katie Singer
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Cell Phone Tower Sunset antenna
Cell Phone Tower Sunset antenna
(Image by JeepersMedia from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

In 2014, the late Jerry Mander (author of 1978's Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television and 1984's In the Absence of the Sacred) organized "Techno-Utopianism & the Fate of the Earth," a teach-in at Cooper Union in New York City. In his opening remarks, Jerry recommended eight attitudes about technology. They're still totally relevant.

Anyone considering a newer car, a newer fridge, a solar PV system, a smartphone, a newer computer or a house would do well to apply these attitudes. (Actually, if you're set to buy a house or anything else that would put you in debt first watch "The Great Taking" with David Rogers Webb.)

Any municipality faced with permitting infrastructure like a new substation and power lines, smart meters, a large-scale solar facility, a battery energy storage system (BESS), 5G, a data storage center or a mandate to sell increasing numbers of electric vehicles should apply them, too.

With much appreciated permission from Koohan Paik-Mander, Jerry's widow, here are his eight attitudes:

#1 The precautionary principle

Since nearly all of what we are told about technology comes from its proponents, be deeply skeptical of all the claims. What's been left out of the story? We can no longer assume that new technology is innocent until proven guilty. The opposite should be the case guilty until proven innocent. That's the precautionary principle. It must be codified.

#2 Never judge technology by the way it benefits you personally.

Always seek a holistic view of a technology's impacts on nature, on resources, on people, on the future. The operative question is not whether it benefits you, but who benefits most and to what ends, and with what consequences?

#3 Get rid of the idea that all technology is 'neutral,' that it can be used for good or bad.

Every technology has inherent, identifiable social, political, cultural, and environmental consequences. Langdon Winner calls it Autonomous Technology. If society accepts automobiles, you get roads covering land, oil development and so on. There is no way around that. The idea that technology is neutral is itself not neutral. It ignores intrinsic dangers and puts blame solely on users.

#4 Remember that individual technologies are only one piece of a larger web of integrated technologies mega-technology.

Every technology builds on the scaffolding of prior tech invention. Your cell phone may seem harmless, but for that little bit of radiation, but for the lithium in the batteries resulting from years of horrible mining practices on indigenous land. Don't ignore the infrastructure it requires.

#5 Distinguish between technologies that primarily serve the small community, like local solar and small-scale farming, and those that inherently operate on a large scale, like nuclear fossil fuels and monocrops.

Always favor the former.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Katie Singer Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Katie Singer writes about nature and technology in Letters to Greta. She spoke about the Internet's footprint in 2018, at the United Nations' Forum on Science, Technology & Innovation, and, in 2019, on a panel with the climatologist Dr. (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Exploring humanness during radioactive times: a review of "SOS: The San Onofre Syndrome: Nuclear Power's Legacy"

First comes love, then come unintended consequences

Before, during and after Election '24

Discovering Power's Traps: a primer for electricity users

26 days after the NIH's National Toxicology Program reported that cell phone radiation definitively causes cancer

France: New National Law Bans WIFI in Nursery School

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend