NeoCommunism
There are no alternatives in Neocommunism.
As with North Korea, China, and Russia there is no alternative political party, political thinking. The implicit nature of Neocommunism is to force everyone to comply to their system, their thinking, and their resulting near total oligarchical corruption. Questioning the system is, of course, disallowed as well for this suggests alternative. Free speech is eliminated, and free thought is impacted. Neocommunism is entirely monolithic and monothematic. And the monolithic 'thinking' is enforced via the execution of the phrase might is right at every stratum of society.
Neocommunism executes resource theft.
Tibet is not China. In fact, it is arguable that many regions of China would love to leave the rule of Beijing and The CCP. China is destroying Tibetan culture, Tibetan people, Tibetan Buddhism and anything else in their way to control and utilize the resources of Tibet. The reason China destroyed sovereign Tibet is for resources.
Ukraine is not Russia. In fact, it would be more correct to say Russia is Ukraine. Ukraine precedes Russia and is culturally a huge influence on the founding of Moscow. Russia is actively attempting to do exactly what China did to Tibet, that is kill, destroy and steal. To suggest that Russia is attacking Ukraine because of NATO expansion belittles why nations join NATO; Russian aggression. To suggest that Russia is attacking Ukraine for anything else other than resource theft and militarism is manure.
A secondary reason for China stealing Tibet was to control the buffer zone between it and India, a place where people are free to adopt alternatives, which is extremely dangerous to monolithic Neocommunism. So, if there is any other reason Russia invaded Ukraine it is to violently steal buffer zone between it and its now renewed adversaries. Ukraine comes from the word for border. It has always been the epicenter, the borderland, between north and south, and east and west. It has always been a land of alternatives with that.
A part of Communist economic theory states that after capitalism and the development of capitalistic factories and systems there will be inevitable failure and worker revolution. And that Communism could then replace the Capitalist system with a Communist system for the people. Neocommunism does not need the failing of capitalism, Neocommunism simply takes and destroys what was built up by capitalism and its alternative inventions. No worker revolution is required to employ The Neocommunist system. Just as Russia simply stole whole regions of Ukraine and explicitly the six reactor Zaporizhzhia Nuclear power plant site with a pen, Neocommunists just steal what was built up by others. And just like in Mariupol and the steel industry there Russia destroyed what it could not steal so no one could have it, like a vengeful toddler. And in the same way Putin and his oligarchical sycophants threaten nuclear strikes on other sovereign nations.
In fact, we all are well aware capitalism can be improved, but likely not with Communism, and certainly not with Neocommunism. In fact, the idea that a system will work great after another system is taken over or ceased is easily interpretable as theft theory to begin with, rather than economic one. Neocommunism is monolithic resource theft, just as China stole Tibet and just like Russia seeks to steal Ukraine.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
