142 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 59 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Rage as a Political Money Spigot

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments

Michael Roberts
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Roberts
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

Yep. It definitely pays. Big bucks. In the millions. It pays , quite literally, to channel voter anger against one's opposition more than it does to seek support for one's own campaign message or rationales for why Joe and Jane Blow should give you money for your campaign.

The roster of top political fundraisers that capitalized on caricaturing and painting the opposition as quintessentially and uniquely evil to raise gobs of money for their campaigns lists BOTH Republicans and Democrats. The bipartisan list of bogeymen includes the "Deep State" for former President Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) for potential Democratic challenger Rep. Colin Allred, and MAGA Republicans against Senate candidate Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

Amazingly, Donald Trump raised a whopping $35 million from his blinkers-on MAGA zealots through his two campaign committees in the second quarter -- about double the amount he raised in the first three months of the year alone. In fact, his two indictments sparked his campaign's biggest fundraising hauls, driven by a surge of small-dollar donors expressing anger and rage toward a perception of law enforcement overreach against their messiah.

But Trump isn't the only politician capitalizing on voter rage. Democrat Schiff, a top Trump antagonist, raised an eye-popping $8.1 million for a race in which he faces, as of now, no credible competition from Republicans. Preparing for a costly primary, he capitalized on House Republicans' vote to censure him last month to turbocharge his already potent fundraising.

According to reports, Schiff raked in over 233,000 donations from all 50 states -- showcasing the breadth of liberal voter anger toward the perceived overreach of the House GOP majority. In this case to do retribution against home for the impeachment number one of Donald Trump when he was president.

Still, even candidates who aren't in Congress proved the power of a polarizing opponent as a fundraising strategy and magnet. In this light, Democratic businessman Adam Frisch, who nearly defeated Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) in 2022, raised over $2.6 million. Frisch's campaign said the imposing tally is the largest quarterly fundraising total for any non-incumbent House candidate in the year before an election , excluding special elections and self-funded campaigns .

Allred, a lower-profile lawmaker than Schiff, still raised an impressive $6.2 million as he pursues a long-shot Senate race in the red state of Texas. His scorching fundraising was fueled by the man he's running against: Ted Cruz, a polarizing conservative and rock-solid supporter of Donald Trump.

However, while mega-fundraising totals matter other things must resonate with voters for candidates to win. Big money is certainly not the be all and end all of winning at the polls. Hillary Clinton out-raised Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election race and lost. Negative political polarization -- the intense dislike of your political opposition -- is today driving politics to the point in which voters forget what their favored candidates even stands for. To be sure, that pays off in the short term, but ultimately to win competitive elections, political campaigns and candidates can't just rely on jacking up their own narrow base.

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Roberts Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

MICHAEL DERK ROBERTS Small Business Consultant, Editor, and Social Media & Communications Expert, New York Over the past 20 years I've been a top SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTANT and POLITICAL CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST in Brooklyn, New York, running (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

October 19, 1983 and The Murder Of Maurice Bishop

Why Black History Is important

Wordsmiths And The Delusional

Blacks Killing Blacks

Black On Black Crime: A Critique

2014 FIFA World Cup: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend