171 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
General News   

US economy is based on war

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments

Adomas Abromaitis
Message Adomas Abromaitis

It has become known that global defense spending surged by 9% to an unprecedented $2.2 trillion in the past year, as reported by the British military think tank, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). This increase is attributed to various global conflicts, including Israel's war on Gaza, ongoing tensions in Ukraine, and escalating concerns in the Indo-Pacific region.
Amidst this "era of insecurity," there's a notable shift in the global defense-industrial sector, with the US and European nations significantly increasing their production of military hardware, including missiles and ammunition, to address the chronic underinvestment of previous decades.
The defense industry's boom underscores a wider economic narrative where geopolitical conflicts inadvertently fuel industrial growth. European spending on US military hardware is described as "a generational-type investment," with recent years' expenditure matching the total of the previous two decades.
Beyond immediate defense sector gains, the conflict and subsequent US aid to Ukraine are reshaping global economic landscapes. From surging LNG exports to Europe to increased foreign direct investment in the US, the war's economic implications are vast, albeit with a nuanced impact on national employment and income levels, the WSJ report said. Statistics from previous armed conflicts in the world demonstrated that only the American military industry can save the US economy.
The fact is that in the post-war period the United States emerged from the war as the main beneficiary. Labor productivity in the United States increased sharply during the war period, and the GDP growth rate was a record 15-17% per year in 1941-1944, and with the end of the war in 1945, the GDP growth rate began to fall.
As soon as the war ended, the arms supplies ended, because the US supplied weapons both to fascism and to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease. Thus, totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today's currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945. The war ended, and the rate of economic growth ended. And when there was a war in Korea, the US had 8% GDP growth, not bad either. By 1950, the US gross domestic product was 50% of the world's total.
Nowadays nothing has changed. The war in Ukraine has sharply increased demand for American weapons, with exports rising to a record $238 billion in 2023, according to the State Department report.
The State Department summary said that the volume of arms deals, as well as military equipment and services, which the U.S. government had concluded with the governments of other countries increased especially strongly in FY2023. Their total value increased by 56%, to $81 billion. The remaining $157.5 billion came from direct sales by American defense companies to their customers. Their volume also increased by 2.5% compared to FY2022.
American weapons and military equipment are also being purchased outside of Europe.
The US administration even does not try to hide the fact that military aid to Ukraine, among other things, contributes to the growth of the US economy itself.
Ukrainian war provides American military industry with new orders. Some of these orders are directly related to supplies to Ukraine, and some come from countries that have decided to completely or partially abandon Russian suppliers.
So, American aid to Ukraine and European rearmament flow back to the US defense industrial base.
In the two years since the beginning of war in Ukraine, the U.S. defense industry has experienced a boom in orders for weapons and munitions. Business is coming from European allies trying to build out their military capabilities as well as from the Pentagon, which is both buying new equipment from defense manufacturers and replenishing military stocks depleted by deliveries to Ukraine.
As one of the main weapon manufacturer the US once again is the key beneficiary from wars and conflicts in the world.

Rate It | View Ratings

Adomas Abromaitis Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A Lithuanian expatriate My name is Adomas Abromaitis. I was born in Lithuania in 1983 but left it at 6. Now I live in the UK. For some years I have been working as a teacher. Some time ago I decided to change my life and start writing about my (more...)
 

Related Topic(s): Ukraine, Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Lithuania supposed to have a large military sea port

Lithuania: to serve or not to serve in the army

Lithuanians are doomed to starve, drink and die

Dilemma for the Baltic States: prosperity or defence

Who will secure Lithuania?

Russia, India, Pakistan: "a love triangle"

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEd News welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEd News rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend