87 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
General News   

Human rights group wants Saddam verdict overturned

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments

Diane Sweet
Message Diane Sweet
A human rights group is calling for the conviction of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to be reversed, RAW STORY has learned.

Citing many procedural and substantive flaws, the advocacy group Human Rights Watch declared in a 97-page report released Sunday that the trial of Saddam Hussein was unfair and that the court should overturn the guilty verdict.

"The proceedings in the Dujail trial were fundamentally unfair," said Nehal Bhuta of the International Justice program at Human Rights Watch and author of the report. "The tribunal squandered an important opportunity to deliver credible justice to the people of Iraq. And its imposition of the death penalty after an unfair trial is indefensible."

The report, "Judging Dujail: The First Trial Before the Iraqi High Tribunal" - which is based on 10 months of observation and dozens of interviews with judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers and is the most comprehensive analysis to date of the trial - details its allegedly serious flaws:

" Regular failure to disclose key evidence, including exculpatory evidence, to the defense in advance

" Violations of the defendants' basic fair trial right to confront witnesses against them

" Lapses of judicial demeanor that undermined the apparent impartiality of the presiding judge

" Important gaps in evidence that undermine the persuasiveness of the prosecution case and put in doubt whether all the elements of the crimes charged were established.

The group also indicated a need for programs to ensure the safety of defense witnesses, and attorneys, as well as programs to explain the legal process to the Iraqi people.

The Dujail trial commenced before the Iraqi High Tribunal in Baghdad on October 19, 2005, and ended on July 27, 2006, with a verdict announced on November 5, 2006. Saddam Hussein and two other defendants were sentenced to death by hanging, and four defendants received prison terms ranging from 15 years to life. One defendant was acquitted at the prosecution's request. The verdict and sentences are currently being appealed to the Appeals Chamber.

The report further argues that unless the Iraqis allow experienced international judges and trial lawyers to participate directly in the court system, not only will Saddam's trial be flawed and conducted unfairly, but any future trials as well.

Saddam Hussein has two more weeks to lodge an appeal but - according to statements made by his lawyer - he has been blocked from doing so.

The chief prosecutor in Saddam's case insists that the convicted defendant was given a fair trial.

originally published in RawStory.com
Rate It | View Ratings

Diane Sweet Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Editorial Assistant @RawStory.com
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend