286 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 45 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

End of an Error

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment

Anthony Barnes
Message Anthony Barnes
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)

As Al Gore Stands on the Receiving End of the World's Acclaim, Americans Count the Days Until the End of the Bush Presidency


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

So many mis-steps along the way 

"Where can you run ,if there is no world of your own?

And you know that no one will ever miss you when you're finally gone."

--  "A Sign of the Ages" by Gil Scot-Heron 

 

Earlier this month, as Al Gore tactfully strode to the podium at a press conference to acknowledge his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize, some observers may have reminded themselves about the harsh attitude held by many Americans about the ex-vice President in the immediate aftermath of 911. After that event, for many Americans, any of Gore's perceived strengths became almost instantly irrelevant.

 

Meanwhile, prior to the attacks, the presidency of George W. Bush was itself, rapidly becoming irrelevant.  So, when Bush made his cinematically dramatic "bullhorn" appearance on the "pile" of World Trade Center wreckage, his near-dormant presidency seemed to have caught its stride. Bush, exhibiting buoyancy often evident in someone who had FINALLY found a cause, raised his bullhorn and resolutely warned that "the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon."

 

It was also during that period, that an often-heard refrain: "Thank God, George Bush is president," became an almost national sigh of relief. Even some Gore voters -- doubtlessly swayed toward Bush by the wholly warranted perception of the cerebral Gore as a measured policy wonk -- voiced that sentiment.  Under the circumstances, it was no time for sapiently deep thinkers.  Thus, it was Bush's perceived "tough-talking Texan" aura, not some genteel Beltway establishment persona, that clicked with a public thoroughly convinced that this president was the "right man at the right time."

A series of daily tracking polls focusing on Bush's performance by Zogby International, illustrate this.  They were taken during the first two weeks of October, 2001, which, somewhat ironically, falls within the same period as this year's announcement that Gore would win a Nobel Prize.  Back then, 89 percent of Americans polled gave a positive rating to Bush's response to the attacks and 74 percent said that they had confidence in Bush's ability to handle the continuing crisis.  Meanwhile, his overall approval rating registering a vibrant 80 percent, peaked at 92 percent on October 9 and 10, 2001, which still stands as the highest approval rating ever for a U.S. president.

 

Today, however, while Bush's approval rating, at around 30 percent, is submerged to just above Nixonian/Watergate-era depths of 24 percent, it is the formerly maligned Gore who is now being celebrated -- repeatedly.  Some may allow this celebration to elicit an urge to characterize Gore's Nobel achievement as his long overdue public vindication.  In succumbing to that urge, however, one runs the risk of ignoring the fact that by Gore having won the popular vote in 2000, the need for vindication is rendered moot.  

 

Certainly post-911, whatever remained of the public's tolerance for Gore's cerebral approach seemed to crumble under the sheer weight of the naked vengeance on the minds of many Americans. Yet, scarcely a few months earlier, by popular vote, America had narrowly voiced itself in the affirmative for Gore.  Despite this, the honor of sitting in the Oval Office would eventually go to Bush through judicial fiat.  That being the case, one would expect that the benefactor of a rather dubious legal interpretation would be the one who needs vindication.

 

In truth, rather than a Gore vindication, it seems logical to define the enlightened blowback from the substantially increased awareness produced through his aggressive eco-activism, as Gore's applied rejoinder to the call by the "thank God Bush is president" chorus.  His adroit response, illustrated through the acclaim he has earned for his most recent efforts seems to be: "Here's an example of the kind of thinking America needs in its presidents." 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Anthony Barnes Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Anthony Barnes, of Boston, Massachusetts, is a left-handed leftist. "When I was a young man, I wanted to change the world. I found it was difficult to change the world, so I tried to change my nation. When I found I couldn't change the (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Death of the Republican Party

SURPRISE! Chris Christie's 2016 Gambit

Starlight and Shadows

ERRORS AND NO FACTS: Business as Usual at Fox News

ISRAEL'S SHAME

PIG TALES

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend