67 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
Sci Tech   

The IAEA Again Thwarts Nuclear Safety to Risk a Zaporizhzhia Explosion Disaster

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow

Once again, the IAEA refuses to consider nuclear reactor safety in the event of a potential nuclear meltdown, where meltdowns cause explosions and environmental disasters.

Following the latest attack on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, the possibility of a reactor meltdown has been cited ("What are the risks at Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant after drone attack?", click here). That is, the press and the IAEA are now claiming that there is such a risk of a nuclear fuel meltdown and Fukushima-type explosion.

All reactors are shut down at Europe's largest nuclear power station, located near the Ukraine war's front line, but it requires constant power to cool the reactors and prevent a potentially catastrophic meltdown.

In a confidential note to member states seen by Reuters on Tuesday, the chairperson of the 35-member IAEA Board said Ukraine and Russia had both written to him the previous day requesting an extraordinary meeting. ("UN nuclear watchdog's board sets emergency meeting after Zaporizhzhia attacks", click here).

The head of the U.N.'s atomic watchdog agency on Sunday condemned a drone strike on one of six nuclear reactors at the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, saying such attacks "significantly increase the risk of a major nuclear accident". ("Attacks on Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant significantly increase accident risk, IAEA head says", click here).

While the risk of a meltdown is certainly important, the risk of a resulting explosion is the blast that could cause environmental catastrophe. As the nuclear reactors cool, the magnitude of an associated explosion is reduced. For any meltdown, an explosion of some magnitude will occur if water is suddenly added to molten reactor fuel. The important question today is how big a Zaporizhzhia explosion can be, and the IAEA blows off any thoughts about a stopping such an explosion.

A Fukushim explosion due to a nuclear reactor meltdown.
A Fukushim explosion due to a nuclear reactor meltdown.
(Image by Japanese government)
  Details   DMCA

More importantly, any reactor explosion can be stopped, and the IAEA refuses to take appropriate actions. This claim is clearly documented in previous Op Eds and peer-reviewed journal articles (Nuclear Threats - Part 5 - An Incoming Nuclear Plant Explosion Disaster- Near Missed This Next Disaster, Stop A Potential Radioactive Europe and Russia - A Letter To Energoatom, The Ukraine Nuclear Power Company, The Ukraine Nuclear Scare - The IAEA Endangered Europe and Russia). A few Op Ed News quotes from an earlier nuclear scare at Zaporizhzhia follow.

'Following missile attacks near another Ukraine nuclear power plant, the Ukraine Nuclear Scare is rekindled, actions to stop a potential radioactive disaster are again discarded by authorities, and I still work to stop the next - preventable - nuclear power plant explosions.'

'On the war front of nuclear disaster, the IAEA refused to consider legitimate methods to prevent a potential explosive nuclear disaster, and the IAEA risked lives, homes, businesses, lands, and waterways to potential Ukraine radioactive explosions.

At the Ukraine, Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plants, lives were at stake, and the possibility of a radioactive dust cloud spreading across Europe and Russia was at hand. By default, the IAEA (The International Atomic Energy Agency), who represents the United Nations, then decisively chose to permit loss of life, permit the radioactive contamination of many countries, and permit the possible evacuation of hundreds of thousands of people.'

Recommended actions to stop such explosions are also available (You Can Stop an Explosive Nuclear Disaster: A Message to Nuclear Power Reactor Operators).

'If you lose power to cool your nuclear reactor, and a meltdown occurs, you (the nuclear power plant reactor operators) can still stop the monstrous explosions that can blast radioactive materials into the air and across your country and/or other countries.

This fight against a shutdown and repression of nuclear safety explosion information is too important to just give up. The risks to our safety and environment are too important to ignore.'

I have lost track of how many times I have said nuclear power plant explosions can be stopped (The American Nuclear Society Fights Against Nuclear Safety to Kill People and Destroy Our Environment).

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, P.E., PMP, ASME Fellow, Who's Who in America Top Engineer, NACE Senior Corrosion Technologist, NACE Senior Internal Piping Corrosion Technologist, AMPP Certified Protective Coatings Inspector, NACE Cathodic Protection (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Global Warming Fallacy, Polar Warming, Energy Use, and Continental Shifts

Book Publisher Wanted for a New Book, "Industrial Murder for Profit"

Are the 737 Jets Safe for Return to Our Skies?

More Exposure Of The Fukushima Explosion Cover-up - Stop The Next Nuclear Power Plant Explosion

The CDC Blames Workers for Food Poisonings to Cover-up Their Incompetence

The Monticello Nuclear Plant Leak Cover-up Keeps on Going

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 20 fans, 12 articles, 17 quicklinks, 2912 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It is scary to have mad men destroying the world around them. Even the dead nuke plants are dangerous. Ukraine's toxic ghost, Chernobyl, can kick up radioactive dust. If I can think of the possibility of sharing the Chernobyl corpse as part of a dirty bomb, the mad men running the war probably have too.

Are we intentionally supplying weapons to contaminate Europe's major bread basket, Ukraine's wheat growing region? Because that is what is being accomplished.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 15, 2024 at 6:22:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

Robert A. Leishear, PhD, PE, ASME Fellow

Become a Fan
(Member since Jun 18, 2021), 62 articles, 170 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

I wrote a philosophy journal article that will be published shortly ("The Price of Engineering Ethics, A Personal Story"). That article states that

'I believe that my work will make our world a little better place to live.' ... 'Moreover, I am in the midst of a one-man war against our government. The stakes of this struggle are our lives, our money, and our environment, which is our world around us. Again, there are costs for doing the right thing, but regret is not one of those costs.'

Submitted on Monday, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:25:24 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend