Previously, all approaches had been abstractions easily disarmed with the double-meanings for simply-described things. Rather than unclear limited-meaning descriptions such as analytical or emotional to describe different types of thought or personalities, we have an irrefutable descrption of the only method, or, more accurately, process available to the exponentially-growing inhuman population: synthesis resulting from antagonism--the creation of rationale for the (necessarily) destructive survival (and growth) of mental mutation.
As a process, it is a machine (built from humans, as Lewis Mumford said), and, as a machine, can be dealt a blow with a wrench: Geist. The single bearing that this machine rotates on can be leveged so hard that its lubrication burns off (if it ever had any) its metal winds up into metalic shards and powder, and even molten drops with deafening screeching grinding noise.
But this machine does have rudimentary feelings (for itself), and definately feels pain; the screeching and grinding as the wrench of Geist is brought down onto its (or their) heads. As they have parasitically adapted to us, we have adapted to them as antibodies. We laugh as their "zombie" suffering as their "night of the living dead" is brought back onto them; we may even feel momentarily sorry, but then we laugh at them again as they feel the pain they have historically enjoyed inflicting onto others.
While the "bearing" of the Dialectic has been previously undefined, this violent response to it is, of course, nothing new--in fact it is an evolutionary response, and hence quite old. But as it has been undefined (unlike now), the response has been prone to perversion to become, yet another, weapon of the Dialecticals.
Adaptation to it is common, as it is necessary for "normal" survival, but, ss always, the double-meanings (that have frustrated us) have been consistently used to reverse intent. This rationalizes synthesis of more of the problem within the scope of the soulution, where the animal rights movement provides an excellent example. Conditioned by animal-friendly television (such as Disney), the exceptionally vicious who are no different from anti-animal sadists satisfy their blood lust with rationalized terror attacks against anti-animal factions such as hunters. The attackers know that they can successfully self-promote themselves to levels of "hero" and "leader," because, as they will explain, they were "brave" enough inflict pain.
The same relationships exist between bankers and revolutionaries, which can be shown to be exceptionally strong (despite their apparent antithesis) because of the historical evidence of the synthesis of their mutual Dialectic.
Source: Dialectic: Hegel's invisible hand
Evidence: Occupy Critical Inquiry
