241 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 154 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 7/8/15

Banksters vs Humanity: Round 14

By       (Page 2 of 13 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   79 comments

Derryl Hermanutz
Message Derryl Hermanutz
Become a Fan
  (51 fans)

As Polanyi explained in, The Great Transformation, it is by their financial control of the international bond market that bankers rule over national governments: by manipulating bond interest rates and exchange values of currencies, and by flooding or starving nations of international payments money.

Governments do not issue their own money: that is the ruse that obfuscates the truth. Governments collect taxes and issue bonds (debt) to get money. Bankers issue money to purchase the debt. Banksters have for centuries exercised monetary sovereignty -- the power to create, originate, issue The Money of Nations. The money purchases the Wealth of Nations. But Adam Smith believed gold is the only "real" money, which blinded him to the power of the bankers' credit/debt money. The economics-industrial complex has maintained this willful blindness ever since.

Money is not "produced" by economic effort: another obfuscating ruse. Money is simply "created" out of nothing by banks. Money is not "backed" by something else. Money is simply numbers or tokens that people accept as "payment" for real stuff. Much ink has been spilled arguing over the definition of "money". But like the proverbial duck, the definition is functional: If it spends like money, if it buys like money, it is money.

The offer to pay money commands people to do whatever you want them to do; commands the economy to produce and build whatever you want. With money you can buy everything that humanity can convert to "property" and sell. Capitalism converts the world to property and sells it for money that is simply created out of nothing by bankers. The buyers of the world then "own it" as their private property.

Money and debt are positive and negative numbers that work by accounting arithmetic. Money numbers have no logically necessary or causal relationship with the "value" of real things in the real economy. Humans "wanting" stuff gives the stuff its "economic value". In our capitalist system, the only people who get the stuff they want are people who have money to "buy" the stuff.

There is nothing inherently wrong with money as an institution. Complex economies need money to function. The problem is that self-serving private interests -- "banksters" -- have captured ownership and ruling power over the institution of "money". And they are using that power to re-create a plutocratic ownership structure governed by a neo-feudal ruling class of owners.

Human ingenuity and effort in the real economy produces all of the real economic value that is bought and sold for money. But the economy produces exactly zero "money". Banks "create" all of the money. How banker money gets into the real economy is one of the "mysteries of the faith" in mainstream economics -- which models a fairytale barter economy in which we exchange the economic "values" of goods with each other.

In mainstream (neoclassical) economic models and theories, we do not buy and sell stuff among each other, for money. We barter. We "trade" with each other. Money is not 'really' real. Money is treated as an abstract numerical representation of the "value" of the real goods and services we each produce and "trade" with each other.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 7   Supported 4   Valuable 4  
Rate It | View Ratings

Derryl Hermanutz Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I spent my working life as an independent small business owner/operator. My academic background is in philosophy and political economy. I began studying monetary systems and monetary history after the 1982 banking crash that was precipitated by (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Free Enterprise vs Corporatism

Banksters vs Humanity: Round 14

Size Matters: Local Democracy vs. Global Plutocracy

The Physics of Spirit

Economic Democracy vs Bankster Plutocracy

Corporations are not free market enterprises

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend