180 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 160 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/2/15

Erdogan Gang Heist - Election Fraud in Turkey Nov 1

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   16 comments, 2 series

Michael Collins
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

Why did the AKP government arrest individuals for "insulting the president" during a political campaign? Journalists, prominent citizens and even a 14 year old were subjected to this distortion of Turkey's legal system. What democracy tolerates the arrest of criticism of elected officials?

Why did the AKP government take over major media outlets, television and print, critical of AKP? The media outlets were occupied by police and seized by the government as the controlling trustee. Overnight, the criticisms of AKP turned into front-page support. What democracy allows the ruling government to seize media outlets, fire reporters, and change the content of the paper of television?

Nearly every day of the campaign, the CHP and MHP leaders called for the investigation of AKP's President ErdoÄŸan. The charges against the president were unrestrained, based on volumes of evidence of fraud by ErdoÄŸan and his AKP cronies.

Turkey's economy is faltering. The nation is no longer a favored destination for foreign investment. Foreign debt is significant and Turkish borrowers are facing trouble repaying foreign loans. Exports are down nearly 9%. Tourism has flattened out according to government sources (which can be interpreted as a significant decline since the AKP government lies routinely).

Turkish business was hit hard due to ErdoÄŸan's conflict with Russia. During the past week Russia blocked the trucks Turkish builders at its border. Russia also decreased its commitment of natural gas supplies to Turkey. Russia accounts for 55% of Turkey's energy needs. The business community knows that ErdoÄŸan's belligerent, war like policies are the direct cause of these and other losses.

Preelection events predicted election day results. ErdoÄŸan and AKP silenced individuals and then critical media outlets for two reasons: to suppress votes for AKP opponents as a result of reporting by these outlets and, more importantly, to silence any reporting on election fraud on election day, which was planned well before the elections.

US-EU Team Democracy Shows Its Colors

Prior to the election, those bastions of democracy, the rulers of United States and European Union, were largely silent about blatant, anti democratic AKP policies. Some western media protested the government takeover of media outlets and a few European parliamentarians worried about democracy in Turkey. No one in a position of power in the west stood up and told the truth about the obvious end of democracy in Turkey just before an election. The team democracy rulers can be counted on for further silence.

Why are the leaders of team democracy silent about the dictatorial actions of AKP? Why can we count on these hypocrites to remain silent?

The answer is simple. ErdoÄŸan and the AKP are the main instigators of the influx of extremist Islamist and al Qaeda rebels in the effort to topple the government of Syria. The Turkish government provides weapons, training, and an open border with Syria. In addition, the Turks are accused of supporting ISIS financially through the purchase of oil stolen from conquered areas of Syria. In essence, Turkey is the last source of support for the U.S. -- EU -- Gulf oil state policy of destroying Syria.

If Turkey's election results ended up with anything other than an AKP single party government, Turkey's Syria policy would have quickly aligned with the overwhelming sentiment of the people. The support of terrorist rebels in Syria through weapons, training, transit, and financial support would be over.

The destruction of Syria would come to a quick end. The "moderate rebels," Islamist extremists, al Qaeda rebels, and ISIS, would be out money, out of weapons, and out of business. The legitimate government of Syria would remain in place and likely be retained in power through elections. Obama, the neoconservatives, and nihilist puppet rulers in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany would incur an outright loss. That can't happen, can it?

Also see series The Struggle for Turkey

Creative Commons 4.0

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Valuable 2   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend