Evil Judges And Dumb Politicians

                        (Emphasis added.)

 

* * * * *

 

                        Hagel continued:

                                    He questions, he probes,

                                    he thinks through the

                                    consequences -- we

                                    almost never do.  We

                                    take an action -- like

                                    going to war – without

                                    thinking.  (Emphases added.)

 

            There you have it.  A well known, highly regarded politician says most of his colleagues cannot and do not think, which inescapably means they are stupid.  It is hard for me to imagine a more explicit remark by a politician about the widely unrecognized mental boobdom, the mental kakistocracy, that has so long led us, that with but few exceptions, and those sometime evil or incompetent for other reasons, has so overwhelmingly been in high office since at least November 22, 1963.  As one whose views on this and other subjects have often been regarded as far out, to put it mildly, I cannot tell you the satisfaction given by the fact that the highly regarded Senator Hagel says exactly what I think:  that most of his colleagues cannot or do not think.  (One wonders what Hagel would say about the stupid, unthinking, and often evil mass media, who give voice to his dumb colleagues and contribute thereby to the disasters they help cause (as with Iraq).)

 

            You know, the older I get, the more the years in which I see the stupid or the evil or the insanely megalomaniacal -- the likes of Jeff Sessions and Jon Kyle and Trent Lott and Joe Lieberman and George Bush -- prevail and/or be given loud voice by the mass media, the more I find myself thinking, elitistly I am sure, that this country needs to be run by people of high intelligence, people who can and do “think through issues,” can and do “think[] through the consequences.”  The older I get and the more I see, the more contemptuous I become, perhaps again elitistly, of views like Hillary Clinton’s claims that seventeen million people who voted for her -- though she may really mean the women who voted for her -- are being disrespected.  I rarely watch cable news, so I really can’t comment knowledgeably about the claims of sexism leveled against the likes of Fox or CNN.  But I do know that lots of us who disliked Hillary Clinton did not dislike her because she is a woman.  We disliked her for the same reason we loathe her husband, who, after all, is a man.  We disliked her because she, like he, is a liar, a dissembler, feels entitled, and will do anything, however rotten, to win.  She, like he, is the very antivalues-epitome of the values we grew up with.  Views like Hillary Clinton’s -- that we inevitably must disrespect women because we loathe her (as we do her husband too, and for the same reasons in both cases) -- are simply more consequences of the pervasive can’t- and-don’t-think nature of our politicians.

 

            I cannot resist, at this point, throwing in a paragraph about a book I recently read which contains page after page showing, not necessarily always intentionally, politicians’ inability to think and their associated incompetence.  The book is Philip Shenon’s The Commission[:] The Uncensored History Of The 9/11 Investigation.  Despite efforts to often portray them sympathetically, one sees throughout the book the dumbness and incompetence of the two Commission heads, the politicians Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton, who thought they could accomplish something by playing nice with the White House, by not subpoenaing information but instead foolishly relying on the Executive to produce it voluntarily, who hired to be, and kept on as, Executive Director of the Commission a friend and coauthor of Condoleezza Rice -- who hired as Executive Director a guy who wrote the document which was the basis for preemptive war in Iraq and who tried to get the Commission to endorse the Iraqi war.  One explicitly sees how Condoleezza Rice -- often said in this space to be both dumb and a liar -- flatly lied by claiming nobody could foresee what agencies had repeatedly warned of:  the use of airplanes as missiles.  One sees that the Republicans on the Commission venally sabotaged part of its work.  One sees a long failure to pursue critical information such as that in NSA files.  One sees how members of the Commission, especially its heads, mainly being creatures of Washington, did not want to point the finger of blame at specific people in Washington who richly deserved blame.  One repeatedly sees a tale of venality, dishonesty, and, directly to the point here, stupidity.  If you don’t believe it, read the book for yourself.  If you do you will understand why the following is Shenon’s last comment in text, at the very end of the “Acknowledgements” section, when he is speaking of the families of the dead of 9/11, who forced an unwilling government to bring into being a Commission which unhappily turned out to be extensively stupid:  “If the full truth is ever told about September 11, 2001,” says Shenon, “it will be their doing.  It has not been told yet.”  (Emphasis added.)  One wishes to say “Of course it has not been told yet.  The investigation, hearings and report were too often in the hands of politicians -- in the hands of the stupid.

 

            The pervasively unthinking, the pervasively dumb, nature of our politicians is, one thinks, a major reason Obama had such an advantage in the race for the Democratic nomination.  Judging by his background, he seems to be someone who can think.  Naturally, right wing nuts will jump on that statement to claim I see Obama as blemish free, as never doing anything questionable, as never backtracking hypocritically, and so on.  (I note that one already reads assertions, some questionable, some undeniable, that now that he has won the nomination and must be concerned with and obtain votes from middle roaders in the general election, he already is backtracking on Iran, on Iraq, on Jerusalem, on campaign financing, on other things.)  Such false accusations by right wing nuts are, after all, a staple of our politics and may even be the staple of the right wing today.  Obama has his faults, and it is not sarcasm to say that one of his advantages may be that he hasn’t been around long enough for more of them to have been uncovered.  But, whatever his faults, it does seem from his background -- not least his academic accomplishments at Harvard Law School, as elitist as it may be to say so -- that he has the ability to think.  Someone who can think is desperately needed now.

 

            Obama’s ability to think will, of course, be tested in the next few months.  It is not merely that he will have to determine positions on many subjects, nor merely that he will have to decide what to do in regard to all the trash that will be flung at him by conservatives -- who excel at that above all else, as shown by people like Rove and Bush -- and that will be mindlessly repeated by the mass media.  It is also that he will have to deal with views flung at him by (a host of) Democratic Party types who, being politicians, can think no better, can think things through no better, than Hagel says Senators do.  He will in particular be subjected to pressure by the Bill and Hillary Clinton types who have desired to make, and long succeeded in making, the Democratic Party a clone of the Republican Party and who wield such power in the Democratic Party.  People in his own party will put a lot of pressure on Obama to adopt (failed) positions they favor and to eschew positions they object to.  Obama will find it is tough, he probably has already found it is tough, to continuously resist bad ideas insisted upon by friends and allies.  It can be even harder than resisting the bad ideas of enemies because enemies, unlike friends and allies, are not people one cares about pleasing.  Surrounded by friends, allies and well wishers who, being politicians, are inevitably likely to press one bad idea after another on him, Obama’s ability to think, to resist the bad, will be tested.  It probably would serve him well, if he has not done so already, to find, if he can, a corps of people to turn to for advice who, like he himself, are capable of high level thinking instead of merely the thoughtless, unperceptive reactions which, as Chuck Hagel made clear, are the hallmark of most politicians and which many of his allies will press upon him.*

    

---

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).