239 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 56 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Freedom and Democracy

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   5 comments

Alan Adaschik

 

Freedom is an easy concept to understand.   One is free when able to do as one wishes.   However, there are obvious limitations to our freedom; the first one being physical reality.   We are free to jump off a building if we wish, but if we do, there is a severe consequence for exercising this kind of freedom.   Similarly, other people are a limitation to our freedom.   An individual's freedom ends where another person's begins.   From this it necessarily follows that the more people around, the less freedom everyone has.   This is why people in a young and relatively un-populated United States enjoyed far more freedom that Americans do today.   But this is not why our Founding Fathers would conclude we are not free.

 

To understand their point of view, it is necessary to realize that there are two distinct aspects to freedom: personal freedom and political freedom.   Personal freedom is the freedom to make personal choices such as what channel to watch on television, what to eat for dinner, whom to marry, whether to take a walk or not, etc.   However, political freedom was far more important to the Founders than personal freedom because they clearly understood that the only way to have and ensure personal freedom was to protect and preserve political freedom.   They believed that without political freedom, personal freedom is at risk because it can be compromised at any time.   Therefore, when drafting our Constitution, foremost in the Founders' minds was to create a document that ensured and protected political freedom.   As an after-thought, they later added the Bill of Rights to ensure that some highly important personal freedoms were specifically protected.

 

What is political freedom?   Political freedom is the inalienable right of self-government and it was identified by Abraham Lincoln when he described our government as being "of the people, by the people, and for the people".   Unfortunately, in America today, most people do not realize the significance of these words and only think of them as a historical curiosity, but in truth, they are the very touchstones of political freedom.

 

"Of the people", means that private citizens hold office, not professional politicians.   "By the people", means the people as a group determine how they will be governed and this function is most emphatically not the providence of elected officials alone.   "For the people", means that our government is our servant and not our master.   This is what the Constitution of the United States of America is all about, this is the primary goal the Founders had in mind when drafting it, and these are the principles they enshrined therein.   Underscoring these principals and necessary to ensure their perpetuation are our inalienable right to free speech, our inalienable right to petition government for the redress of grievances, and our inalienable right to hold those in government accountable for their actions under the Constitution.   In addition to the foregoing, the final element necessary to ensure freedom is the two underlying principles of enlightened democracy; majority rule tempered by the protection of minority rights.

 

The issue on hand that would be of major concern to our Founding Fathers and should be to us, is how well does the government we presently live under measure up to the above-described principles?   Unfortunately, upon examination, the answer to this question is painfully obvious; it does not.

 

First and foremost, we do not have a government that is "of the people".   Instead, our elected representatives are lifelong professional politicians whose first order of business is feathering their own nest and protecting the status quo.   However, this is not the worst of it because in the United States of America today it takes a tremendous amount of money to run for national office.   Therefore, in keeping with a desire to look out for their own interests, the very first order of business of a professional politician is to ensure that those providing him with money and support continue to do so.   The only way to do this is to do their bidding.   No one with power and influence contributes to and supports politicians so they can independently vote their conscience in the best interests of this nation and its people.   Therefore, the real first order of business of a professional politician is to vote to please those who contribute money and do favors for them.   Doing what is best for the people of this nation is secondary.

 

"By the people":   Instead of living under the government created and bestowed upon us by the Founders, how our government functions and operates has been changed through the years, not by amendment as required by our Constitution, but, wrongfully, by simple legislative acts.   In other words, the government we presently live under is not the brainchild of our Founding Fathers as we delude ourselves into believing, but instead, the handiwork of professional politicians whose loyalties and motives have just been discussed.

 

"For the people":   A healthy economy is in everyone's best interest and many politicians, especially Republicans, subscribe to the trickle-down theory of economics as follows; when corporations earn profits, for the most part, they are reinvested in the economy thus creating jobs and adding to the prosperity of all concerned.   This kind of thinking is used by politicians to justify their catering to special interests.   True, it is self-serving to a degree, but in the past such thinking had validity and did no real harm to the nation.   However, this is no longer true.   Special interests and the corporations they represent have become globalized.   In other words, our situation is now such that those who call the tune that politicians dance to are concerned with global issues and have no concern for the well-being of Americans and the American worker.   This being the case, the trickle-down theory, as far as Americans are concerned, is bankrupt.   When politicians cater to special interests and help corporations earn money from Americans, this money is invested overseas where it is cheaper to do business.   The end result of this is a steady flow of wealth out of the country that is robbing us of our prosperity.   Our elected representatives pretend to be for us, but in deference to those who back them, knowingly act to allow this to happen, belying what they pretend to be.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Alan Adaschik Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Al Adaschik was born in New London, Connecticut, on June 27th, 1943. He was raised in Brooklyn, New York and attended Franklin K. Lane High School. Upon graduation, he was accepted as an engineering student at the University of Michigan in its (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Our Environment

Homo Sapians: A Failed Species

Freedom and Democracy

The Curse of Capitalism

The Fed is a Ponzi Scheme

God, the Bible, and Christianity

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend