Anything marked as "intelligence" is also designated top secret by the all of the DNI agencies. So all Open Source Intelligence products become "top secret" once it is earmarked for an agency.
Here's the riddle me this concept that will twist your head- What if I was an enterprising young man trying to make my way in the world of spying and after I researched "intelligence," I sold the Open Source Intelligence I found, or gave it away to my beloved chat group, then re-titled it, and sent a report containing the same "Open Source Intelligence" to the alphabet agency of my choice. What if I was given a commendation as well as a pat on the back? Atta-boy!! is my call sign after all!
In this case, no one broke any laws because the information was Open Source and shifted hands before it was earmarked, sent to an agency and classified. This is being done on a regular basis at different levels. It needs to be stopped.
Even though the laws are already there prohibiting these activities, there is literally a gray area of policy and law that these Intel players skirt around and operate in when committing acts against the American people. They identified it and made sure Congress keeps a gap in any laws they testify for as expert witnesses.
What is a gray area? How can you get hurt by something gray?
On September 21st, 2015, Harding posted this advertisement to scale up the war against you.
"Ladies, Gentlemen, and everyone in between.
I am building a database of planners, operators, logisticians, hackers, and anyone wanting to be involved with special activities I will call 'inform and influence activities'.
I have received a few different suggestions to help organize operations -- of all sorts -- against anti-Western elements. No government approval, assistance or funding. This skirts legalities. This is not explicitly illegal and it may not even be legal, at this point. That grey area extends a long way.
I am only trying to assess the availability of people willing to participate in such efforts. Technology, equipment and facility offers are also appreciated. If you would like to be included in my database, please send a tailored resume to joel_harding at yahoo.com. In your resume, I am more interested in actual skills and experience. If you have hands-on experience of a less than legal nature, you might not want to admit illegal work. If need be, I will contact you for clarification of your skills."- Joel Harding
This man designed Ukraine's Information Policy in 2015 and 2016. He is helping to develop what is shaping up to be the policy in the US today. Propornot pulled from his list to develop their own. The first industry hotshot that jumped up to help was Aaron Weisburd.
What's special about these three?
Weisburd, Clint Watts, and JM Berger testify for Congress as Intel and security industry experts. The three of them are responsible for a lot of harm the Intel community is causing to US citizens as well as innocent people across the world. They are widening those gray areas so they can make more money off of you.
In view of that, over 12 years after this was first reported by RJ Hillhouse's and Tim Shorrock's articles, we have a problem inside the Intel community where companies and individual parties like Weisburd, Watts, Berger, or Bellingcat's Aric Toler, or Eliot Higgins train the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, NATO, and various other foreign state agencies. They are attacking US and foreign citizens while pursuing their own interests, their company's bottom line, or for their client's interest. These attacks have nothing to do with national security or intelligence.
Yet, the information they pass along is included in the President's Daily Briefing? People with no Intel backgrounds help decide who is an enemy of the state? That's the reality we are left with even though it sounds like a surreal grade-b movie.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
6
3
2
