When the Irish banksters were challenged about these recent mortgage rate increases they responded that they were forced to raise the rates because they were losing money. They 'regretted' the need to charge more but said they had to become profitable in order to help turn the economy around. These declarations of regret and protestations of civic-mindedness are completely disingenuous and nothing more than a crock of horse manure. They are as sincere as the tears of the crocodile before he devours his victim.
According to Michael Quirke, AIB's Head of Mortgage Products:
"Funding availability on wholesale money markets for Irish financial institutions remains difficult. Unfortunately, we have little choice but to introduce this pricing change, which is a measured response to the significant challenges which must be overcome if we are to achieve an economic return on our loan book and thereby return to a sustainable business model".
Brendan Nevin, BoI's Director of Consumer Lending, explains the reasons behind the increases:
"Funding mortgages has become increasingly costly. For example, we are paying more to customers for deposits than we are receiving for mortgages.
"As a result of this, our current mortgage pricing is unsustainable.
"While any increase is regrettable, we have no choice but to make this move to ensure we remain open for business and continue to support our customers and the Irish economy going forward."
Re-read Mr. Nevin's second sentence, "we are paying more to customers for deposits than we are receiving for mortgages". Do you believe him? Do you think he's telling porkie pies?
On the face of it, to the uninformed majority of borrowers, it might seem like Mr. Nevin is telling the truth. We'll ignore for the moment the fact that banks can borrow from the European Central Bank at 1% and charge 3.49% for mortgages. Banks also need depositor funds so that they can leverage new loans into existence. Let's say that they pay these depositors 5% interest on their savings. They would appear to be losing 1.51% if they then only charge 3.49% for mortgages.
But that is certainly not the case, not by a country mile.
Through the fraudulence of Fractional Reserve Lending, banks can create 10 to 12 times or more of new money based on customer deposits. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) they must keep on hand a minimum reserve of 8% of deposits in case some customers want to withdraw their cash. The balance they regard as 'excess reserves' and can be used to create new money as loans.
For example, a customer deposits � "� �10,000. The bank holds � "� �800 in reserve and can lend out � "� �9,200. This is newly created money and exists alongside the original � "� �10,000 which is still in the customer's account. When the new � "� �9,200 is deposited in the same bank, or any other bank, the bank holds 8% of that in reserve and can create a further � "� �8,464 of new money. This can go on and on until some � "� �125,000 of new money is created. And the original depositor still has � "� �10,000 in his account.
So, if the bank paid their � "� �10,000 depositor 5% interest, it would cost them � "� �500. If they only loaned out � "� �10,000 at 3.49% they would just earn � "� �349, a loss of � "� �151. This is what the weeping and hand-wringing BoI (and all banks) want the public to believe. But through the leverage of Fractional Reserve Lending the bank can expand its interest percentage to 43.63% of customer deposits which means they actually earn � "� �4,362.50, giving them a grotesque net profit of � "� �3,862.50 on the original � "� �10,000.
This is usury of the most despicable kind. It is immoral, unethical, and cruelly punishing on borrowers. That it is tolerated by governments is utterly baffling and unpardonable.
What is the solution?
There are a number of solutions. One of them is explained in the next article, "Irish Government To Auction National Assets: Criminal Stupidity Or National Sabotage?"
According to Michael Quirke, AIB's Head of Mortgage Products:
"Funding availability on wholesale money markets for Irish financial institutions remains difficult. Unfortunately, we have little choice but to introduce this pricing change, which is a measured response to the significant challenges which must be overcome if we are to achieve an economic return on our loan book and thereby return to a sustainable business model".
Brendan Nevin, BoI's Director of Consumer Lending, explains the reasons behind the increases:
"As a result of this, our current mortgage pricing is unsustainable.
"While any increase is regrettable, we have no choice but to make this move to ensure we remain open for business and continue to support our customers and the Irish economy going forward."
Re-read Mr. Nevin's second sentence, "we are paying more to customers for deposits than we are receiving for mortgages". Do you believe him? Do you think he's telling porkie pies?
On the face of it, to the uninformed majority of borrowers, it might seem like Mr. Nevin is telling the truth. We'll ignore for the moment the fact that banks can borrow from the European Central Bank at 1% and charge 3.49% for mortgages. Banks also need depositor funds so that they can leverage new loans into existence. Let's say that they pay these depositors 5% interest on their savings. They would appear to be losing 1.51% if they then only charge 3.49% for mortgages.
But that is certainly not the case, not by a country mile.
Through the fraudulence of Fractional Reserve Lending, banks can create 10 to 12 times or more of new money based on customer deposits. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) they must keep on hand a minimum reserve of 8% of deposits in case some customers want to withdraw their cash. The balance they regard as 'excess reserves' and can be used to create new money as loans.
For example, a customer deposits � "� �10,000. The bank holds � "� �800 in reserve and can lend out � "� �9,200. This is newly created money and exists alongside the original � "� �10,000 which is still in the customer's account. When the new � "� �9,200 is deposited in the same bank, or any other bank, the bank holds 8% of that in reserve and can create a further � "� �8,464 of new money. This can go on and on until some � "� �125,000 of new money is created. And the original depositor still has � "� �10,000 in his account.
So, if the bank paid their � "� �10,000 depositor 5% interest, it would cost them � "� �500. If they only loaned out � "� �10,000 at 3.49% they would just earn � "� �349, a loss of � "� �151. This is what the weeping and hand-wringing BoI (and all banks) want the public to believe. But through the leverage of Fractional Reserve Lending the bank can expand its interest percentage to 43.63% of customer deposits which means they actually earn � "� �4,362.50, giving them a grotesque net profit of � "� �3,862.50 on the original � "� �10,000.
This is usury of the most despicable kind. It is immoral, unethical, and cruelly punishing on borrowers. That it is tolerated by governments is utterly baffling and unpardonable.
What is the solution?
There are a number of solutions. One of them is explained in the next article, "Irish Government To Auction National Assets: Criminal Stupidity Or National Sabotage?"
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
