398 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 88 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Tyrant Trump Is the 2nd Amendment's Covert Hell-Spawned Enemy

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments, In Series: Tracts for Our Times

Patrick Walker
Message Patrick Walker
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

Refusing Peaceful Transition Creates a Strong Presumption of Tyranny

Despite the persistent (wrongheaded) belief that the 2nd Amendment is Americans' best safeguard against tyranny, the bar of public opinion is set extremely high for what constitutes actionable 2nd Amendment tyranny. Apparently, for example, plutocrats' iron stranglehold on U.S. policy doesn't remotely qualify. If "2A" is to retain any value at all as a credible deterrent against tyranny, perhaps we need to distinguish between normal instances of "tolerated tyranny" and truly egregious cases of intolerable, beyond-the-pale tyranny. I'd say, if the Second Amendment offers any deterrent value against tyranny of any sort, Trump's threatened refusal to leave office peacefully upon losing the election qualifies as the egregious kind. As such, it makes the perfect test case for whether the theory that having a heavily armed citizenry deters tyranny is just "bear crap".

Precisely what makes Trump the Second Amendment's "covert, hell-spawned enemy" is that Trump's refusal of peaceful transition--the best test case for testing whether "2A" can deter tyranny we've ever witnessed--puts his heavily armed supporters in a terrible bind. If they truly believe it's a deterrent, they must support the theory that discussing conditional assassination of Trump is protected free speech; "2A" can't possibly deter Trump from a proposed egregiously tyrannical act if we can't freely warn Trump he's putting himself at risk of being shot. Failing to permit public speech about conditional assassination renders the 2nd Amendment completely toothless as a deterrent to proposed tyrannical acts.

On the other hand, if Trump supporters "stand by their man" and refuse to protest such speech, they risk flushing their beloved "2A" down the constitutional toilet. Among other things, they create the legally indefensible impression that the Second Amendment is just for right-wingers and can never be invoked by the left. If 2A is good law, leftists should be just as free as right-wingers to invoke it as an anti-tyranny deterrent. Neither side, of course, should invoke it over trifles, but risking civil war by refusing peaceful surrender of power carries a pretty strong legal presumption of being an act of tyranny. It's hard to imagine the right not screaming tyranny at deafening decibel levels if a Democrat president attempted a similar coup.

Whichever party's president attempted such a coup, it ultimately comes down to a question of facts. Unless there's powerful evidence that, as Trump claims, voter fraud is massive and the election is really being stolen from him, it's almost impossible not to view his refusal of peaceful transition as a dangerous act of tyranny. My proposal is that we have our election carefully scrutinized by the most objective available outside observers--for example, those from the UN or international civil society organizations.

Of course, I find it highly probable that Trump supporters would accept as objective observers only loyalists from their own side. Which leads us to the most powerful way in which Trump is a veiled, hell-spawned enemy of the 2nd Amendment: he's living proof it can enable fascism.

More on the close connection between fondness for guns and support for fascism in my next "tract".

(Article changed on September 30, 2020 at 12:03)

(Article changed on September 30, 2020 at 12:14)

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Patrick Walker Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Patrick Walker is co-founder of Revolt Against Plutocracy (RAP) and the Bernie or Bust movement it spawned. Before that, he cut his activist teeth with the anti-fracking and Occupy Scranton PA movements. No longer with RAP, he wields his pen (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Frankly, Koch Brothers Deserve the Death Penalty

Let's Hunt Neoliberals to Political Extinction (Part 1 of 2)

Obama's Real Legacy: Savior of Corporate Fascism

Fascism without Totalitarianism: America's Present Plight

Climate Judge Hansen "Profiles" Clinton's Democrat Criminals

Hillary Sings Pop: "Talked to Stiglitz for Nothing (I Want My TPP)"

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend