KB: The Lebanese army is one of the rare institutions in Lebanon that is non-sectarian; that brings together people of all parts of the nation, of all walks of life, of all communities. It enjoys a very strong support from most Lebanese.
However, it is facing severe challenges, a situation of overstretch. It has to make sure the cease-fire is implemented. It has to protect the Lebanese borders, to handle the upheavals in Syria, the rise of crime within Lebanon. So, it was supposed to have received additional resources after the international donors conference that was held in Paris a couple of months ago. But, it appears that the United States is not yet willing to allow the Lebanese army to obtain weapons that could potentially defend Lebanon against Israel. And, this would give a pretext to Hezbollah if Hezbollah does not intend to respect the clauses of the cease-fire.
The Lebanese army is a strong institution; however, in the past few years, it has suffered from a lack of resources, a lack of funding. And, when there is funding, it often comes from foreign countries, whether the United States or Arab Gulf countries, which is also quite problematic if we think in terms of Lebanese sovereignty. So, one of the main objectives of the incoming government should be to strengthen the Lebanese army and to make sure it has the resources necessary to defend Lebanon against foreign aggressions wherever they come from.
4. SS: The IMF offered help to Lebanon, but they had certain conditions to receive that help. In your opinion, have those conditions Been met?
KB: The IMF offered to help to Lebanon, but indeed the conditions have not yet been met because the Lebanese political and financial establishments are very reluctant to accept transparency, to accept clear criteria and lift banking secrecy, because this would reveal an awful lot of about the financial crimes and misdemeanors that took place in the past 15 years. And, the irony is that while the IMF is very often criticized in the Global South, in Latin America and elsewhere, because it is perceived as imposing austerity, imposing neoliberal solutions, and it is opposed by the left in most of these countries. In Lebanon, it is those who are objecting to an IMF program are mostly members of the political and financial oligarchy, because they feel that the IMF will force them to respect the so-called 'hierarchy of claims': meaning that after a country's banks go bankrupt, they have to hold their shareholders accountable before proceeding. So, many members of the Lebanese Parliament, particularly the finance committee, which is very close to private interest groups, and very close to shareholders of the major banks, have been trying to torpedo an IMF deal for the past few years.
And, so far they were successful. They procrastinated, they refused to respect the conditions. And most reformers in Lebanon tend on the other side to express perhaps certain criticism of the IMF program, but to be supportive of an IMF deal because they know it is sort of a visa that they need to get support from other countries and it would allow to put some order in a system that has been completely bankrupt. So it is a typical Lebanese paradox where you see that the IMF solutions are perceived as much more progressive, as much fairer to the weakest segments of the Lebanese population. And, the Lebanese 'kleptocracy' went so far in its arrogance and its unwillingness to share the losses in an equitable way, that the IMF today appears as a lesser evil to many Lebanese.
5. SS: Recently, there have been military clashes on the Syrian Lebanese border between the Lebanese tribes and the HTS forces from Syria. In your point of view, why did the new Syrian administration in Damascus promote an attack on Lebanon?
KB: I think it expresses local tensions between tribes, and the fact that HTS has yet to completely control Syria. It's not easy to take the idyllic model and replicate it at a national level. So, I do not think it was premeditated.
It is nonetheless quite worrying. It is creating a certain sense of insecurity among certain segments of the Lebanese population who live near the borders. So, one should hope that the new Lebanese and Syrian authorities will very rapidly meet and establish a solid framework to make sure that these clashes end, and that Lebanese sovereignty is protected, and to find a solution to the issue of Syrian refugees who have been in Lebanon for the past several years.
Steven Sahiounie is a two-time award-winning journalist
Copyright Journalist Steven Sahiounie
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
