Before I go to the case 2 I would like to point at the difference between the human coprophags and the dogs. Unlike with canines, human coprophagia is a deliberate, self- inflicted and self- developed character feature. It is an ability to generate poop and consume it with joy, whether it yours or someone else's. Humans cannot be trained to keep away or obey the 'Off' command. They not only snarl but bite and even kill those who make an effort to distract them or to prevent other people from contracting the same unfortunate feature. Knowing that we proceed.
Case 2. The Snarling Lady.
Fairly recently, a 'distinguished journalist' lady published an article on opednews practically snarling at the Jews. Not all Jews, mind you. She was upset with only certain Jews, those, who for whatever reason openly tried to separate themselves from the Israeli policies. Most of those Jews do not live in Israel. They are academicians, writers, public figures in the countries of their residence. As such they exercised their rights as citizens, particularly the right of a free speech. The unlovely lady-pundit was furious. She called them all kinds of names, including the clichéd 'self- hating Jews', traitors and even said that they inflicted more harm than the terrorists. How touchy.
Now, Israeli policy is by far a big heap of sh*t to consume and here we have a perfect specimen of a coprophag on the retainer. The lady does not give a sh*t about the Jews; she just does her job. Her Zionist masters claim an ownership on all the Jews in the world. According to them any Galacha Jew (that is the one born by a Jewish mother) belongs to them body and soul, no escape. If the body is not in Israel and the children do not serve in the IDF, then the soul must serve it: think about it, help it financially, praise Israel and Zionism in any possible way. Zionists are cultists; they crave stupidity and fanaticism and they hate the doubt and curiosity. Obviously, they fear and hate those Jews who do not give a damn about them, live their own independent lives and say whatever they want about anything. They view those people as a direct threat to their existence and rightfully so. The snarling coprophag lady eats the sh*t the Zionists produce and snarls at anyone who threatens their (and thus hers) sustainability. A perfect specimen as I said.
There is something extremely sad in this particular case, though. I do not know about other my fellow- readers but I feel very depressed whenever I encounter a snarling woman- coprophag. That seems so unnatural, so mean, really. Women for me are the symbols of common sense and tolerance, the beacons of a civilized behavior. And when the otherwise intelligent lady of letters suddenly bares her fangs and snarls it is like losing the sense of humanity. Sad, what a waste, really.
Case 3. Three heaps of sh*t for Mr. R.
This case is of a personal nature because it was the only one when I tried a Tabasco sauce approach to cure a coprophag; alas, with no success. Mr. R. is a commenter on the opednews site; he does not write articles. My interaction with him revealed the three heaps of feces he sits comfortably in between:
- The US is the greatest country in the world; it single- handedly won the WWII against the Devil-lead Nazis; and whatever it does is terrific no matter what.
- Israel has to be loved unconditionally and Zionists are saints. All the Jews belong to them and if you love Israel it means you love the Jews.
- All Moslems are prone to violence and irrational behavior because of their religion and upbringing.
Any rational veterinarian would understand from those three edges that here we are dealing with the self- developed coprophag, a person who built his own comfortable, small Universe, powered by the heat from those heaps and feels perfectly happy there. I should have known better before I implemented the Tabasco sauce drop pointing out to him that none of the postulates above have anything to do with the real world and/or truth for that matter.
The unfortunate Mr. R. started snarling right away. At first he called me a 'Moslem cleric', which corresponds to the postulate #3; in his eyes apparently to be a Moslem cleric means to promote violence and intolerance. Then, when he realized his mistake he invented a definition of the 'lost soul, still sad from leaving the former USSR'. He denied me even my Jewishness because apparently it seemed that he 'loved the Jews' but could not stand that one particular Jew, that would be me. He also got really irritated at my statements about WWII and wrote that he was tired of the self- proclaimed expert of sorts. I let it drop after that. No need to bother. But for the sake of the readership there is one thing I need to mention here: I am an expert in the WWII affairs. Not by choice but by destiny. In the country like Russia which lost 27 million people in that carnage the children of those who themselves were children in that war are the true experts.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
