Partisan voter fraud cases are only the latest instances of Bush Administration’s improper politicization of Justice Dept.
Boston Globe reporter Charlie Savage found that “Hires with traditional civil rights backgrounds […] have plunged. Meanwhile, conservative credentials have risen sharply. Since 2003 the three sections have hired 11 lawyers who said they were members of the conservative Federalist Society. Seven hires in the three sections are listed as members of the Republican National Lawyers Association, including two who volunteered for Bush-Cheney campaigns.” (Civil rights hiring shifted in Bush era. July 23, 2006.)The McClatchy Papers report “New U.S. attorneys seem to have partisan records.” “Since 2005, McClatchy Newspapers has found, Bush has appointed at least three U.S. attorneys who had worked in the Justice Department's civil rights division when it was rolling back longstanding voting-rights policies aimed at protecting predominantly poor, minority voters.” (March 23, 2007.)
Salon finds that “Since George Bush took office, his administration has been not so quietly dismantling the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, which is responsible for enforcing the nation's civil rights laws, and doing it for the same reason the eight federal prosecutors were fired: to use the enforcement power of the federal government for Republican gain.” (Bush’s long history of politicizing Justice. March 29, 2007.)
Earlier, Washington Post’s Dan Eggan reported, “Many current and former lawyers in the section charge that senior officials have exerted undue political influence in many of the sensitive voting-rights cases the unit handles. Most of the department's major voting-related actions over the past five years have been beneficial to the GOP, they say, including two in Georgia, one in Mississippi and a Texas redistricting plan orchestrated by Rep. Tom DeLay (R) in 2003.” (Politics alleged in voting cases. January 23, 2006.)
Selling Americans on the idea that fraudulent voting was undermining elections is a key strategy in passage of restrictive voting laws.
Salon’s editors write “The party has used these claims of voter fraud to help build public support for what it considers electoral reforms, like requiring voters to show photo ID -- reforms that also tend to suppress Democratic turnout on Election Day. During the Bush administration, a rhetorical tool became public policy. (How US Attorneys were used to spread voter fraud fears.)
Washington Post columnist Jabari Asim writes “But the efforts of Republican lawmakers in Georgia, Indiana and, most recently, Missouri seemed aimed at making it as difficult to vote beneath our spacious skies as it is in war-torn Third World nations.”
Kansas City Star’s columnist Laura Scott writes: “No one -- election authorities, poll watchers or voters -- made complaints of voter impersonation or fraud to Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, however. That's noteworthy because Missouri lawmakers identified widespread fraudulent voting as the problem when they passed the requirement for voters to show a government-issued photo ID. But the photo ID law didn't solve any fraud problems. It wasn't in effect in November. (Make it easier, not harder, to cast a ballot. February 26, 2007.)
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
