Meanwhile, rising incomes among portions of some populations - such as in India and China - are shifting to a diet that includes more meat. This is redirecting grains from direct consumption to meat production (Economist). Since it takes much more grain to produce meat than to get that protein directly from the grain, it increases demand on those crops - crops already being diverted for bio-fuel production. U.S. farmers grew 15 million tons of corn for ethanol in 2000. That tally is expected to total 85 million tons for 2007 (Economist).
Since the United States is one of the major global exporters of corn, the shift to ethanol and the subsidies driving it, are driving of food cost in the Untied States, and across the world. Hence we have report after report pointing to a global food crisis, and that food crisis will lead to growing political instability (Vidal). Other countries are taking the same approach as the U.S. from Brazil, to Russia, to China. All of this takes food out of the mouths of billions of people around the globe - perhaps more than half of the population:
I have been regularly shouting the meme for years of "Don't put the food supply in competition with the fuel supply." Clearly that message is finally being recognized, but it is ignored by both government policy makers and the corporations who influence them. The consequence is increasingly billions of people living at or below starvation level, and growing bloody conflict as desperate circumstance drive desperate action.
In the United States, we are experiencing the confluence of issues which will serve to magnify the impact. The increasing cost of fuel combines with the increasing cost of food, combines with a falling dollar. The falling dollar is critical. While it is directly impacted by the national debt which is directly impacted by U.S. military "adventures" for oil, it is also impacted by oil being bought and sold in U.S. dollars (the petrodollar). The falling value of the dollar decreases its buying power which increases real costs across the board. The creation of a national and global grain shortage drives up those costs and therefore the costs of food.
As the corporate media shows us rising gas prices and issues the mantra that "it is not impacting car driving," think about those grocery prices. First, it has impacted people's private transportation (and car purchasing) choices. People (who can afford to) are reacting to increasing gasoline prices. People (who cannot afford to) are shifting to other forms of transportation or cutting their food budgets or consumption. Since those struggling to put food on the table are a largely "invisible" population, the media can get away with the lies. However, food banks across the country are facing empty shelves and the hungry leave with empty hands.
It is a "quiet" problem; a hidden problem; but it is real. Everyone is impacted by it, though the severity of that impact is moderated by income. We will face the question of who eats and who does not? Who lives and who dies? We will also face the conflict that arises from this. The domino effect is huge and is implicated in everything from internal warfare to recruitment into "extremist" groups to the parents selling their children and themselves into slavery.
The answer is not more oil drilling or more bio-fuels or hydrogen fuel cells. We have to address consumption and life style. In this year of political campaigning will any candidate be brave enough to confront this issue directly? Probably not voluntarily. However, we are important to them at this point and we can (and must) push the questions and the dialogs.
Ethanol is the dominant reason for this year's increase in grain prices. It accounts for the rise in the price of maize because the federal government has in practice waded into the market to mop up about one-third of America's corn harvest. A big expansion of the ethanol programme in 2005 explains why maize prices started rising in the first place.
Ethanol accounts for some of the rise in the prices of other crops and foods too. Partly this is because maize is fed to animals, which are now more expensive to rear. Partly it is because America's farmers, eager to take advantage of the biofuels bonanza, went all out to produce maize this year, planting it on land previously devoted to wheat and soyabeans. This year America's maize harvest will be a jaw-dropping 335m tonnes, beating last year's by more than a quarter. The increase has been achieved partly at the expense of other food crops.
This year the overall decline in stockpiles of all cereals will be about 53m tonnes--a very rough indication of by how much demand is outstripping supply. The increase in the amount of American maize going just to ethanol is about 30m tonnes. In other words, the demands of America's ethanol programme alone account for over half the world's unmet need for cereals. Without that programme, food prices would not be rising anything like as quickly as they have been. According to the World Bank, the grain needed to fill up an SUV would feed a person for a year.America's ethanol programme is a product of government subsidies. There are more than 200 different kinds, as well as a 54 cents-a-gallon tariff on imported ethanol. That keeps out greener Brazilian ethanol, which is made from sugar rather than maize. Federal subsidies alone cost $7 billion a year (equal to around $1.90 a gallon). (Economist)
Since the United States is one of the major global exporters of corn, the shift to ethanol and the subsidies driving it, are driving of food cost in the Untied States, and across the world. Hence we have report after report pointing to a global food crisis, and that food crisis will lead to growing political instability (Vidal). Other countries are taking the same approach as the U.S. from Brazil, to Russia, to China. All of this takes food out of the mouths of billions of people around the globe - perhaps more than half of the population:
Lester Brown, founder of the Washington-based Worldwatch Institute thinktank, said: "The competition for grain between the world's 800 million motorists, who want to maintain their mobility, and its 2 billion poorest people, who are simply trying to survive, is emerging as an epic issue."
Last year, he said, US farmers distorted the world market for cereals by growing 14m tonnes, or 20% of the whole maize crop, for ethanol for vehicles. This took millions of hectares of land out of food production and nearly doubled the price of maize. Mr Bush this year called for steep rises in ethanol production as part of plans to reduce petrol demand by 20% by 2017. (Vidal)
I have been regularly shouting the meme for years of "Don't put the food supply in competition with the fuel supply." Clearly that message is finally being recognized, but it is ignored by both government policy makers and the corporations who influence them. The consequence is increasingly billions of people living at or below starvation level, and growing bloody conflict as desperate circumstance drive desperate action.
In the United States, we are experiencing the confluence of issues which will serve to magnify the impact. The increasing cost of fuel combines with the increasing cost of food, combines with a falling dollar. The falling dollar is critical. While it is directly impacted by the national debt which is directly impacted by U.S. military "adventures" for oil, it is also impacted by oil being bought and sold in U.S. dollars (the petrodollar). The falling value of the dollar decreases its buying power which increases real costs across the board. The creation of a national and global grain shortage drives up those costs and therefore the costs of food.
As the corporate media shows us rising gas prices and issues the mantra that "it is not impacting car driving," think about those grocery prices. First, it has impacted people's private transportation (and car purchasing) choices. People (who can afford to) are reacting to increasing gasoline prices. People (who cannot afford to) are shifting to other forms of transportation or cutting their food budgets or consumption. Since those struggling to put food on the table are a largely "invisible" population, the media can get away with the lies. However, food banks across the country are facing empty shelves and the hungry leave with empty hands.
It is a "quiet" problem; a hidden problem; but it is real. Everyone is impacted by it, though the severity of that impact is moderated by income. We will face the question of who eats and who does not? Who lives and who dies? We will also face the conflict that arises from this. The domino effect is huge and is implicated in everything from internal warfare to recruitment into "extremist" groups to the parents selling their children and themselves into slavery.
The answer is not more oil drilling or more bio-fuels or hydrogen fuel cells. We have to address consumption and life style. In this year of political campaigning will any candidate be brave enough to confront this issue directly? Probably not voluntarily. However, we are important to them at this point and we can (and must) push the questions and the dialogs.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
