Comey sat quietly, with nothing to say. "Let the record show a very long pause," Specter said.
Now, on February 2006, after the secret surveillance program became public, Gonzales, testifying before Congress, said there had been no major disagreement within the administration concerning the legality of a widespread electronic eavesdropping without asking for court warrants. The answer is moot because what they all thought, or whether or not they disagreed, (even though what he said was inaccurate), is/was immaterial and irrelevant. The law does not depend on whether or not lawbreakers by acting against the Constitution, breaking the law, a treasonous matter, do or do not think. All lawbreakers say the same thing anyway.
Despite what Gonzales said, and it appears that anything he has said needs to be discounted, Comey and many other high-ranking Justice Department officers were threatening to resign if the White House continued the surveillance program in it’s then present form. "Mr. Ashcroft's chief of staff asked me something that meant a great deal to him," Comey testified this week, "and that is that I not resign until Mr. Ashcroft was well enough to resign with me." Facing such pressure, Bush and Cheney caved in on adjustments, which addressed Justice’s reservations?
Gonzales's testimony in 2006 was allegedly a sham, according to what others said later. The administration was facing a revolution within its ranks over the disregard of the constitutionality of the issues at hand. This was not something which Mr. Gonzales had informed the Congress.
The number of times that Mr. Gonzales supposedly misled Congress and the public is apparently becoming legion. Senator Leahy, so far, has talked a good game, now it is time to walk the walk a thing the Democrats are rapidly losing credibility and votes for the 2008 election over, to the endless delight of the Republicans, who are so used to the Democrats snatching defeat from the jaws of victory that they probably feel they need do nothing but stand back and watch the gutless wonders blow another key opportunity. That many Democrats would like to hang a Nancy Pelosi dummy in effigy, is no longer even a question in doubt. The latest views of her chances of regaining her seat in the next election are next to nil. If not, than someone ought to ship all her voters and her puppet master with them, to a red state where they would be right at home or to a hospital, which gives Up-Your-IQ-Shots.
To make matters even worse, notes from FBI Director Robert Mueller, which Congress released Thursday, seemed to indicate that the Bush administration prevented Attorney General John Ashcroft from reviewing the program, wanting him to sign without reading it.
Stanley Brand, Former Counsel to the House of Representatives called it "unbelievable" that "the Attorney General of the United States was barred from getting information on a decision that the law required him to make. This notion that the President can seal himself off from his own Attorney General is ludicrous."
Now, I ask the question all Americans with an enlightened view of life must ask, What in the Hell does Mrs. Pelosi need to initiate impeachment? She is, in essence shielding, aiding and abetting as well as giving shelter to the enemy, a group of war criminals and domestic gangsters, right out of a “B” movie, who, by the evidence submitted and affirmed, will stop at NOTHING, holding the law in contempt, to accomplish making a mockery of America and Americans. This is a very clear example of a man who ignores everyone, his own father, his superior officers, when in service, ball-less national guard officers I might add, who should have gone after him and court Martialed him, He has gotten away with things men of conscience would never want to do because of the despicable nature of such actions.
His parents allowed him to rebel without restraint, and with impunity, to hold them in contempt, with impunity, to hold his commanding officers in contempt, with impunity, holding his nation and all of it’s sacred documents in contempt and to assault them, all with impunity, and holding God and His laws in contempt, so far with the same impunity. God, however, waits upon men to settle their disputes, before taking a hand before and/or after death. What a place in Hell this criminal has secured for himself and once again he has a fool, behind a fool, nurturing his criminal behavior, in this case a woman, one who if he were impeached along with his vice president, would be president, herself-OHMYGOD what a horrid thought! Who the Hell, given the choice of a deserter, who is acting lout his cowardice by strutting while surrounded by billions of tons of armour and armament, the last refuge of the impotent minds and glands, or a woman who allows him to continue destroying the law and murdering innocents, framing enemies, destroying our sacred documents, our peace and tranquility, and himself to be Dominated by a demoniac the measure of which any coward with have crawling and begging for mercy, had he not surrounded himself with the coward’s key weapons, thousands of body guards, armor and bunkers and proving himself to be the American equivalent times 12, of the man he had hung for oil and for having the audacity to make a threat, (if only in the mind of this “president”) on his father’s life? What makes Nancy Pelosi and the leotard wearing, prancing, brain that is “advising” her, think that there is going to be a nation left for a Democrats to be president of, and furthermore, that after this fiasco of do-nothingness that most of us who worked so hard writing, calling, donating, will ever again trust the lying bitches hiding behind doing nothing but talk and complaining like sissies?
The election may well, never take place. Who to blame? Do you mean besides the 60% of working adult women who failed to vote? And/or, do you mean the 50,000,000 in 2000 and 53,000,000, in 2004, fools who voted twice for a moronic demoniac? Or Mrs. Pelosi, or Mr. Gore who walked out on America by not challenging the Anti-Christ? Or a congress which whines and accomplishes nothing, or the MSM, which owned by the enemies of egalitarianism, fraternity and liberty, allows greed to make traitors of them, and to whom will they complain when facing the Almighty at the end of their wasted lives? I say we change the law and allow Arnold Schwarzenegger to run on a ticket that features He as VP and Hugo Chavez as President, what do you think?
Now, on February 2006, after the secret surveillance program became public, Gonzales, testifying before Congress, said there had been no major disagreement within the administration concerning the legality of a widespread electronic eavesdropping without asking for court warrants. The answer is moot because what they all thought, or whether or not they disagreed, (even though what he said was inaccurate), is/was immaterial and irrelevant. The law does not depend on whether or not lawbreakers by acting against the Constitution, breaking the law, a treasonous matter, do or do not think. All lawbreakers say the same thing anyway.
Despite what Gonzales said, and it appears that anything he has said needs to be discounted, Comey and many other high-ranking Justice Department officers were threatening to resign if the White House continued the surveillance program in it’s then present form. "Mr. Ashcroft's chief of staff asked me something that meant a great deal to him," Comey testified this week, "and that is that I not resign until Mr. Ashcroft was well enough to resign with me." Facing such pressure, Bush and Cheney caved in on adjustments, which addressed Justice’s reservations?
Gonzales's testimony in 2006 was allegedly a sham, according to what others said later. The administration was facing a revolution within its ranks over the disregard of the constitutionality of the issues at hand. This was not something which Mr. Gonzales had informed the Congress.
To make matters even worse, notes from FBI Director Robert Mueller, which Congress released Thursday, seemed to indicate that the Bush administration prevented Attorney General John Ashcroft from reviewing the program, wanting him to sign without reading it.
Stanley Brand, Former Counsel to the House of Representatives called it "unbelievable" that "the Attorney General of the United States was barred from getting information on a decision that the law required him to make. This notion that the President can seal himself off from his own Attorney General is ludicrous."
Now, I ask the question all Americans with an enlightened view of life must ask, What in the Hell does Mrs. Pelosi need to initiate impeachment? She is, in essence shielding, aiding and abetting as well as giving shelter to the enemy, a group of war criminals and domestic gangsters, right out of a “B” movie, who, by the evidence submitted and affirmed, will stop at NOTHING, holding the law in contempt, to accomplish making a mockery of America and Americans. This is a very clear example of a man who ignores everyone, his own father, his superior officers, when in service, ball-less national guard officers I might add, who should have gone after him and court Martialed him, He has gotten away with things men of conscience would never want to do because of the despicable nature of such actions.
His parents allowed him to rebel without restraint, and with impunity, to hold them in contempt, with impunity, to hold his commanding officers in contempt, with impunity, holding his nation and all of it’s sacred documents in contempt and to assault them, all with impunity, and holding God and His laws in contempt, so far with the same impunity. God, however, waits upon men to settle their disputes, before taking a hand before and/or after death. What a place in Hell this criminal has secured for himself and once again he has a fool, behind a fool, nurturing his criminal behavior, in this case a woman, one who if he were impeached along with his vice president, would be president, herself-OHMYGOD what a horrid thought! Who the Hell, given the choice of a deserter, who is acting lout his cowardice by strutting while surrounded by billions of tons of armour and armament, the last refuge of the impotent minds and glands, or a woman who allows him to continue destroying the law and murdering innocents, framing enemies, destroying our sacred documents, our peace and tranquility, and himself to be Dominated by a demoniac the measure of which any coward with have crawling and begging for mercy, had he not surrounded himself with the coward’s key weapons, thousands of body guards, armor and bunkers and proving himself to be the American equivalent times 12, of the man he had hung for oil and for having the audacity to make a threat, (if only in the mind of this “president”) on his father’s life? What makes Nancy Pelosi and the leotard wearing, prancing, brain that is “advising” her, think that there is going to be a nation left for a Democrats to be president of, and furthermore, that after this fiasco of do-nothingness that most of us who worked so hard writing, calling, donating, will ever again trust the lying bitches hiding behind doing nothing but talk and complaining like sissies?
The election may well, never take place. Who to blame? Do you mean besides the 60% of working adult women who failed to vote? And/or, do you mean the 50,000,000 in 2000 and 53,000,000, in 2004, fools who voted twice for a moronic demoniac? Or Mrs. Pelosi, or Mr. Gore who walked out on America by not challenging the Anti-Christ? Or a congress which whines and accomplishes nothing, or the MSM, which owned by the enemies of egalitarianism, fraternity and liberty, allows greed to make traitors of them, and to whom will they complain when facing the Almighty at the end of their wasted lives? I say we change the law and allow Arnold Schwarzenegger to run on a ticket that features He as VP and Hugo Chavez as President, what do you think?
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
