But Carroll does not mention that certain early Jesuits were famous missionaries who went from their European countries to far off places such as
Carroll also does not mention the 1986
Because the Jesuit missions in
Moreover, I think they also wanted what
Carroll mentions in passing that the Jesuit order was officially suppressed at one time, largely because of the successes of Jesuit missionaries in
It would be hard to measure the impact that the historical suppression of the Jesuits has on contemporary Jesuits. However, it is probably safe to say that contemporary Jesuits would prefer not to have the Jesuits suppressed again.
But how should we factor in the historical suppression of the Jesuits by the pope in trying to assess Fr. Jorge Bergoglio, S.J., who became the Jesuit Provincial Superior of Argentina in 1973 at the age of 36? As Carroll notes, "he was exceptionally young for such a position." He served as Provincial from 1973 to 1979, "a span that overlapped with the so-called Dirty War, in which
Carroll notes, "By Bergoglio's admission, he was not prepared for the challenges of exercising authority in such a tumultuous context." But if Aeschylus is correct in claiming that we learn from suffering, what did Bergoglio learn from his searing experiences of exercising authority in such a tumultuous context?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).