jibbguy: Tell us what you would like to see done ultimately with the Rotoverter, where you would like to see this technology go in the future?
Ashtweth Palise: Grants for the open source RV engineers. But first the implementation of the RV into peoples lives who can use the energy saving capacity. Solar work shops using the prime mover concept. Solar water pumps, any application where typically you could not run a solar application feasibly and economically with out using the energy saving Rotoverter principle. Also further R & D done. Currently Dr. Peter Lindemann has suggested we consult Eric Dollard and ask him to apply his “4 Quadrant” theory towards the RV's overunity research. Peter Lindemann is a largely unknown free energy researcher by the mainstream faculties but a very respected scientist in the free energy communities. He has stated that Eric could have the answers to extract 95% of reactive power through complex RLC systems.
Currently we know that the RV produces excess reactive power compared to the input watts needed to create it. However extraction of this is still needed to be perfected at this time. Since the RV produces a COP of 18 in reactive power, or basically for 340 watts you can create over a 1000VARS in circulating current, if Eric's proprietary system could extract 95% of that as claimed, it would give you a self powering system off the shelf free energy device. I would like to see Eric help.
Mean time our open source engineers are working around the clock to crack the code. What I would like to see now is farmers and others using the energy saving capacity of the RV. This is something we have gone to great length to prove. Water pumps, drill and generators can all be optimized. This research is listed in our on line university.
jibbguy: How would you advise new inventors of free energy devices.. What should they do to get their product into the marketplace successfully?
Ashtweth Palise: I would advise them that whenever they disclose they have something working and whenever they intend to do a scientific test of OU, that the Panacea organization has it presented… Loaded and doing REAL work. Then have some one who is qualified to do an independent validation under the exact same load test. License out their device and get it independently validated, build consumer awareness and demand this way. That will make it difficult to suppress. Contact our non-profit org, let our 400 engineers replicate it, and you can still protect your intellectual property under an NDA.
ALL, that is EVERY SINGLE PERSON TO DATE, have proven that trying to do this conventionally you WILL go wrong. Please read our research and remedy offered for this problem. We have significant TV appearances this year, we will have the GEET, Hydroxy boosters, and Bedini technology which will have scientific validated tests for credibility. We also have a Cold Fusion replication, Bob Boyce and RAVI water fuel cells, and an MRA under construction. Once we acquire credibility on the GEET, RV, Hydroxy boosters, and Bedini technology (…these cannot be denied for practical usage and output); then we have the center stage to INTRODUCE the COP+1 technology. Our Demos will also be in participation with 2 Universities. We also have invited government and philanthropic foundations and sponsors. This is A SURE way to get it validated and taken seriously. I must stress again what we need for introducing ANY claimed free energy device: OPERATION UNDER LOAD IN A REAL LIFE CONDITION. We must not show a device working with lights and meters. We need better work being done. Plus we need independent validation and replication. Or have a centralized hub like the intended proposed granted Panacea Research and Development Center which is tailored to validate and research these technologies, promote them and educate the mainstream faculties.
jibbguy: What is stopping free energy technologies from being taken seriously by mainstream science; and reported on in the mainstream media?
Ashtweth Palise: Beside the energy cartels, as you can see we have done over 4 years of energy suppression research ( http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/energysuppression.htm ). It is the inventors!! Yes believe it or not, not the corporate structure or the mainstream faculties irrational skepticism from their institutionalized dogmatic conditioning. Its the inventors method of disclosure. This was explained in detail in previous questions and on our web site. The remedies are there. We not only need a research center tailored specifically to DISCLOSURE AND VALIDATION (under a specific criteria) of alternative and suppressed energy but also for SUPPRESSED medicine. Without it the inventors will continue to not provide an accredited third party faculty with an independent replication. They want to keep it to themselves, no one knows how to reproduce it, and no one gets a validation. Then the faculties and public get left with no access and a big question mark as to whether it works. Then we ALL get nowhere. Or in some cases the inventors get erased! They do not have the facilities for security or public awareness to advance education. This is what is required to advance to capacity.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
