Assault on Democracy
Given global competition, scarcity and the overt
necessity driving world leaders home to protect and preserve their own indigenous
economies, what can, or should, American institutions--namely, education, work,
social and political--do to protect America's solvency, while simultaneously preparing
future generations for vital leadership roles in local, state, federal, private,
political and global marketplaces?
Americans
have become too complacent, lazy and overtly comfortable. Arguably, if people
work at it long and hard enough, anyone can destroy anybody or anything. Citizens have acquired an onerous appetite
for 24/7 news, reality shows, and the newly crowned crà ¨me de la crà ¨me modern day
Robin Hoods: the "US Congress and Occupiers."
It's not just Congress; globally democracy is being challenged for Truth and Transparency in government, pitting
citizens against public leadership.
Robert Reich, a UC Berkeley Professor and former
Labor Secretary for President Clinton, said: "We all
know the economy is broken and no
longer works for people." (EPI.org, 12/12/11) Surely America's founding fathers
in creating a constitution for "We-the-People',
envisioned more than economics, or creating one "Me-the-Guru', supreme leader. By design, democracy is a delicate union and
balance between government and people. Somehow
this relationship is on the rocks, resulting in open bickering and wrangling among
public leaders. It's almost as if some leaders
still used pacifiers, road tricycles and, even worst, still believed in the
boogieman. Sadly, citizens are equally at fault.
Allowing any rogue group, Anonymous, Congress, 99%'er,
MoveOn.org, et.al., to masquerade representing most citizens is dangerous: here
and abroad. Becoming amused by such
antics, playing out on CATV, national dailies and the movies is equally hideous
and troubling. Folly aside, citizen's overt
apathy has liberated public leaders to freely run amuck. No one doubts their passion; it's their
wisdom that's questionable. None of the parties or government branches seems willing
to blink, make crucial decisions, compromise, or take any responsibility for the
"job and oath' they allegedly took freely. This core fiduciary duty, delegated by
citizens to public leaders, has become America's Achilles heel, leaving some citizens
no other choice than to act-up and
show-out to secure representative government.
Between
Isaiah and a Hard Place
Aspiring self-acclaimed prophetic leaders, posing as
public servants, are gradually destroying faith in government--and leadership. Back
in 1980, I recall several of my evening organization theory and management
students openly criticizing supervisors, and bureaucracy generally. They took
direct aim at day supervisors, managers and anyone else in authority. After allowing them time to vent and settle
in, I asked two simple questions. First, name the supervisor? And second, their
names? Rhetorically, this inquiry caught
them off guard. Yet, as they causally
allowed the questions to marinate, beyond alluding to my temporary insanity,
truth replaced frustration giving way to dialogue. Almost predictably, a lively discussion
around democracy, trust and transparency in governance ensued. After explaining that leadership was a compound
word, dependent upon mutually-dependent outcomes for success, they began to own
the concept. No doubt this frank, yet juvenile
dialogue, has evaded the US Congress thus far.
Indeed, from direct observations of other local/state/municipal
governing boards for 2-years, I've found this waning lack of trust in public
leadership not unique to Congress. What is rare, however, is the fact that only
about one-third of Congressional members have college degrees. Not that a college degree lends itself to
enhanced civility or wisdom, but only suggesting a few evening classes in
higher education, mixed with a little street-wise-common-sense, might improve member's
relations and decrease chaos and grandstanding in the Halls of Congress. At a minimum, it may improve governance for "all the people'.
Presumably, all political parties--Democrats,
Republicans, Independents--strive to represent voters. However, almost four years after President
Obama ran a successful election campaign on, "Yes We Can', some in congress and even his own party, have trump
him by declaring--"No You Won't'! As national polls plummet for politicians,
Washington and citizens are hurting by this dysfunctional drama played out in prime
time. Both executive and legislative branches have this fatal affliction.
The problem is threefold. First, this satire is costing democracy and
America's stock globally! Second, "John
Q. Public' is an equally responsible for being AWOL. Third, recall how quickly US banks reversed
those dreaded ATM fees as Occupiers organized their message, and ranks, via the
Internet? Conceivably taking cues from Egypt, Iran, Libya,
Syria and Yemen, some assert this rogue movement took off as the Internet went
viral. Others claim it began as America
took prayer out of schools, simultaneously as a host of other nations put Him back in. Origins aside, it's time for all citizens to wake-up, rise-up and hold up American democracy.
Leadership
is Global, not a Mom-and-Pop Store
Unquestionably, Americans are anxious over losing jobs,
homes, a lean economy, and keeping (so-called) aliens outside US boarders. Still, as citizens are ostensibly blinded and
mesmerized by a few misfits impersonating public leaders, they've given many public
bodies a blank check to abandon their fiduciary duty of service, for personal
gain funding by taxpayers. Issues of civility,
decency, ethics and honesty are lost in this arrangement. America can ill-afford to sustain this status
quo.
As Robert J. Sternberg, Dean and Professor of
Psychology at Tufts University, brilliantly argued in "Assessing What Matters", citizens must rethink how leaders are identified,
prepared, trained, evaluated and rewarded. (Ed Leadership, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2008) For Congress, this definitely couldn't hurt.
In the aftermath of America's victory in WWII, do you
recall how the Japanese, Chinese, Koreans and others began migrating to North
America shortly after the war? They came
with cameras in hand, heads graciously bowed, taking thousands of photos of factories
and, yes, US citizens blissfully eager for those rare photo-opts. Fast-forward to today. Even though American productivity is at all
time highs, we're literally paying those nations to build our cars, make our clothes,
refine natural resources, and awarding liberal tax-breaks for foreign-owned plants
to be built on American soil: all under the guise of hiring American workers. Adding insult to injury, America's
opportunity costs for economic apathy is citizen unrest and higher interest
rates on money borrowed resulting in an escalating national debt. This flawed strategy has produced a "perfect
storm' for public leaders where taxpayers currently borrows more money, at
higher interest rates, than those 24 hour check cashing stores.
This is not a separatist argument. In fact, American democracy was built by
immigrants--and slaves--imported during England's initial occupation of the Homeland. But, rolling over to the whims of a few anarchists
or legislative bullies, doesn't enhance freedom for most, but certainly
mandates "Responsibility' from all
Americans.
In summary, Americans often take the path of least
resistance: unless we're attacked or at war. And while Congress passed a few tax
compromises before the holidays (likely to get for personal reasons), American
democracy needs a tune-up to remain puissant.
Hence, as voters prepare for the 2012 elections, each citizen, public leader
and political pundit alike might consider Robert Green's advice: "To succeed in the game of power, you
must master your emotions." (The 48 Laws of Power, 1998) Thus, the next time a politician draws a
line-in-the-sand, expect voters to bring shovels in droves digging holes for each
of them.
Finally ,
citizens are urged to screen, vote and routinely elect leaders trained to pledge allegiance to "truth', honesty and transparency':
this alone shall assure America's legacy of hegemony beyond the 21st
century.