97 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

If Jesus Had Been Packing


John Rachel
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Rachel
Become a Fan
  (47 fans)


(Image by John Rachel)   Details   DMCA

On Baby Jesus' officially designated day of birth, I wanted to explore the Prince of Peace's relationship to lethal weaponry.

If Jesus had had a gun, they never would have been able to nail Him to the cross.

Then again we have to ask . . . would He have refused to use it to defend Himself?

This is a gray area and things get a little confusing. Let's face it, the Prince of Peace became a real rock star as a result of the "turn the other cheek" sound bite. On the other hand, at one point Jesus threw quite a temper tantrum and tossed the moneylenders out of the Temple -- physically tossed them out, from what I gather. It was His Steven Seagal moment.

Certainly we can conclude from this, the Guy was no wuss. At the same time, we have no record of Him punching anyone in the face or dropping kicking anyone's family jewels, much less offing them with whatever instruments of slaughter were available at the time.

Yet seeing some big hairy brutes coming at you with massive hammers and nails the size of a jack handle is definitely going to push some buttons. If He had anything resembling a fight-or-flight reflex, it's not unreasonable to assume that had a handgun been available, He would have emptied a few rounds into his beefy assailants and made for the hills.

What kind of weapons would Our Savior have been packing, assuming all options were on the table? Hard to say with any certainty. But He wasn't much for mincing words or equivocating. It seems reasonable to assume He would not have made some lame choice when it came to arming Himself. I'm no expert so I'm just guessing here. But I surmise He would have had the nice and punchy Sig Sauer P228 within easy reach -- strapped to His thigh under His robes -- and had a kick-ass semi-automatic assault weapon slung over His shoulder. This would have given Him both the solace of being able to mount a quick response and the necessary firepower in case He needed to spray some serious lead around.

What kind of assault weapon would have been the Savior of Mankind's first choice? The popularity of the Bushmaster AR-15 certainly makes it the obvious frontrunner. But I personally think he would have gone with the Israeli IMI Tavor TAR-21. After all, Jesus was a Jew and there's got to be some basic loyalty at work. And practically speaking, the IMI Tavor TAR-21 is one sweet killing machine. It's compact, relatively light and great at close and medium range. Those Romans getting ready to nail the Big Guy to the cross wouldn't have stood a chance. Blam! Blam! Blam! Bye-bye, motherfuckers!

How about munitions?

Being generally disposed in His preaching to encourage His devoted flock to always show compassion, I think He would have chosen standard issue bullets and only considered using hollow-points as a last resort.

The most important thing to appreciate when thinking about Jesus Christ packing any kind of weaponry is the powerful message it sends. After all, who could possibly take seriously the word of a man who isn't willing to stand up for what he believes in? Who won't stand strong in the face of opposition. Who lets himself be bullied and threatened. Who isn't man enough to look some smart aleck punk Roman soldier in the eye and say, "Make my day!"

I'm certainly not saying Jesus would have gone around and indiscriminately brandished His weapons of choice every time He got in a fix. Being the Prince of Peace, He would have been the last to lock and load. But that's the beauty of guns. You don't have to use them to make your point or at least to let others know you're not going down without a fight.

What I am saying is that if Jesus had been packing that day they crucified Him, those Roman thugs would have had second thoughts about nailing Him up like a Raggedy Ann door prize at the county fair. He wouldn't have died for our sins and . . .

Uh-oh.

We'd all go to Hell.

Hmm . . .

That would be bad.

Well Said 2   Supported 2   Touching 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Rachel Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Rachel has a B.A. in Philosophy, and has written eight novels and three political non-fiction books. His political articles have appeared at OpEdNews, Russia Insider, The Greanville Post, and other alternative media outlets. Since (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Be Afraid ... Be Very Afraid!

Obama Surrounds Himself With Neocons and Other Hawkish Lunatics

Trump's Gone Too Far This Time!

Isn't it Time to Stop America's Ugly Game of Thrones Business?

Freedom of the Press

Ten Commandments For A New American Century

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEd News welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEd News rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments  Post Comment


John Rachel

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 47 fans, 135 articles, 5024 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

  New Content

Jesus was the Prince of Peace. But if he had had, for example, an assault weapon, would He have sprayed His assailants with some hot lead when they came to nail Him to the cross? Something to think about during this beautiful Christmas holiday season.

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 12:22:29 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Liam Watt

Become a Fan
(Member since Jul 12, 2013), 3 fans, 1 articles, 168 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I'm not qualified in history or theology to make an erudite comment. We'll have to wait for Mike Rivage-Seule for that. I can only say, briefly, what the Jesus story means to me.

Some wanted Jesus to lead a revolution against Rome. He went as far as putting the bankers on notice, but apparently had a higher calling - to demonstrate the meaning and purpose of life on earth. Something like:

Ego is not an entity - it is an activity of mind. You are God - an individual spark of Cosmic Consciousness temporarily embodied in a beautiful form - an extension of the Eternal and Self Existing Source of Life which is your true identity, with all that implies. Your essence is Love - everything else is a call to Love, to be reconnected to your true home, strength, bliss and destiny. Just listen. "Behold - I stand at the door and knock."

It seems that, in effect, by his submission, his sacrifice, Jesus was saying - "Here - I'll show you."

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 3:10:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (2+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 47 fans, 135 articles, 5024 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

Reply to Liam Watt:   New Content

"I'm not qualified in history or theology to make an erudite comment."

Hardly true. Why wait for others, who probably suffer severe limitations and are compromised by their own distorted world views and prejudices, to do our thinking? We are all equally capable of coming up with our own twisted, self-sabotaging, logically inconsistent, puerile but occasionally propitious points of view. Just spend an hour on X and there's your proof!

Thank you for your thoughtful interpretation.

I feel confident that the example of Jesus' show-and-tell -- despite some minor bumps in the road, like nuclear annihilation, genocide, ecological destruction, etc -- will set a new high standard for humans and we will live happily ever after.

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 8:46:06 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Gary Brumback

Become a Fan
(Member since Feb 9, 2024), 10 articles, 20 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

John, you are a swell guy, and I dislike disagreeing with you, but I must. Religion, in my opinion, is a thorn in humanity's side. Religion teaches people to see what they believe, a very dangerous habit. Religion has never seen a war it didn't start (e.g., the Crusades), promote (Christian fundamentalists are the worst at that), or tolerate. Have a great 2025, John! And I wish that for the entire OEN community! Gary

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 3:38:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 47 fans, 135 articles, 5024 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

Reply to Gary Brumback:   New Content

It is indeed surprising to find disagreement in an article that posits nothing to disagree with, other than the need for occasional comic relief in the horror show unfolding in our savage world today.

Puzzling reaction to a piece that satirizes the absurdities that the promoters of "organized religion" have made out of the essential teachings of an imagined prophet.

But have it your way. I guess.

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 8:34:04 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 47 fans, 135 articles, 5024 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

  New Content

By the way, here's an interesting analysis for anyone who wants a more historically informed interpretation of the "turn the other cheek" meme.

Turning The Other Cheek? What It Meant In Its Historical Context

Nothing seems to be what it isn't. But is it what it seems to be?

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 28, 2024 at 8:54:05 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend