104 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 39 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 9/26/18

Remembering the Word: Perestroika

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments

Bill Habedank
Message Bill Habedank
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Mikhail Gorbachev's recent op-ed "It's time for a second American revolution in the spirit of perestroika" published June 10, 2009, in the Sydney Morning Herald, took me back to the summer of 1990. I was attending my twenty-five year high school class reunion in the small, rural and very conservative town of Ada in northwestern Minnesota. Most of the residents of the town where I grew up were of either Norwegian or German descent. The religions were the usual mix of denominations but mainly Protestant or Catholic. My class size was sixty-five so everybody knew everybody else.

On the first night of the event, we had a social hour to meet spouses and catch up on the lives of old friends, then a quiz on the history of our town and class. Finally the organizing committee had us write down a word on a piece of paper to turn in. The best entries would win a prize. We were to write down the one word which we never would have dreamed or believed possible twenty-five years earlier. As I thought, many words flashed through my mind. The one that stuck with me was the word perestroika, a very unusual word but certainly one whose significance would be recognized by people my age.

The word perestroika was first made famous by the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in a speech he gave in December of 1984. It really gained importance in the Soviet Union by 1986. What did the word mean? Gorbachev said the word had many meanings but basically the meaning of the word was "revolution". In the context of the Soviet Union, this meant the measures needed to promote democratization of the Communist Party and thus change the whole political system in the USSR. It included changing the economic and social structure to allow semi-private business ventures to form in the hope that it would stimulate the economy of the Soviet Union to change from a government-controlled economy to a market-oriented economy.

How absolutely astounding and unbelievable! Here was a softening of the political empire that was the Soviet Union. How could this be happening?! This Class of '65, part of the Baby Boomer generation, which had lived under the threat of nuclear war for all of their born days could maybe see hope that the global madness would end. We no longer had to "duck and cover"! Maybe for once we could see a world for our children free of threat from the sky. In 1990 there was finally hope that the nuclear threat could be a thing of the past.

Well back to the contest at my high school reunion. The winners were announced. Third place goes to "personal computer". Alright, my word still has a chance. Second place goes to "Atari". Wow, maybe my word is the big winner; I really need that case of beer! The winner is "Macarena"--the Brazilian dance. Oh well. Better luck at the next reunion.

I didn't give this much more thought till recently. Why was the word perestroika not important to Baby Boomers back in 1990? Was it because they did not understand the word or was the word not important because it was better for other peoples of the world to conform to what we Americans wanted? I believe it was the latter because it always seems easier for others to make the sacrifices necessary for real change. The Bush Plan to cut taxes and keep prices low appealed to those of us who wished to live our imminent retirements wealthy, worry free and in relative comfort. Many believed it better for the next generation to pay the real costs of the social, economic and environmental changes that are needed to preserve this country and the world.

I now realize that we need to be brave and forward thinking to solve our problems just as the people of the Soviet Union did back in the 1980s. Gorbachev was right in 1984 and he's right now that it is time to put an end to the division in the world, wind down the nuclear arms race and defuse conflicts. We need perestroika right here in the United States of America.

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Bill Habedank Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Peace activist since Sept 2002, Member of Veterans for Peace, Chapter 115 and its executive director, retired veterinarian
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Bunkers for People who Failed Us

Take the Lashing

Final Battle for Peace

Remembering the Word: Perestroika

Compassionate conservatism - it still exists

 Compassion - Where Has It Gone 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend