All
across the country, people are hearing calls to raise the "save rate"
at animal shelters. But beware: As warm and fuzzy as that sounds, a shelter's
high "save" rate does not reduce by one puppy or kitten the number of
unwanted animals born every minute in private homes, in puppy mills, in breeders' kennels and
catteries, on the street or under a porch. In fact, it can increase that
number, to the detriment of dogs, cats, taxpayers and
law-enforcement officials.
Shockingly, pressures to raise shelter "save rates" actually increase the pet overpopulation crisis. How? To reduce the number of animals it euthanizes, a shelter must reduce the number of animals it takes in by charging high "surrender" fees, putting people on waiting lists, sending unsterilized animals to foster homes, and more. Many people cannot afford high fees, and those evicted from their own homes or entering a women's shelter or nursing home can't wait for weeks or months for their animal to be admitted.
Cities
learn the hard way that to play the "high-save-rate" game, something
has to give. Because the number of homeless animals far exceeds the number of
available homes, no matter what is done to try to conjure up more adopters, facilities
are always full. Sick, injured, old, aggressive and other
"unadoptable" animals are turned away--since accepting them would hurt
the "save" statistics.
Shelter
operating hours are also often reduced to decrease intake, leaving anyone who
can't take time off during the day out of luck. Elderly people on a fixed
income and others who cannot afford the fees charged by veterinarians for
euthanasia are left with nowhere to take their old and ailing dog or cat for a
merciful release.
In
San Antonio, Texas, where the shelter has gone "no-kill" and many
strays are left to fend for themselves, animal wardens report that thousands of
stray animals are breeding, forming packs and dying on the streets, with more
than 28,000 dog and cat bodies scraped up in the last year alone.
Shelters
trying to achieve a high "save" rate invariably stop requiring
verification that previous animal companions have received veterinary care and
stop conducting even basic home checks--vital safeguards that prevent animals
from falling into the hands of people with evil intentions. And animals
are handed over to anyone who can "foster" them, including to animal
hoarders who stack cages in their house, basement or garage. This situation creates
nightmarish scenarios, such as the recent Florida case in which 100 cats burned
to death inside individual plastic crates, unable to flee as the plastic melted
onto them, and the Angel's Gate "animal
hospice" in New York, where police found caged animals who had died in
agony without veterinary care. Every week brings news of more little
houses of horror.
Shelters
that cram more animals into runs and cages than can safely be accommodated
become so severely crowded that the dogs fight and injure themselves, the cats contract
upper respiratory infections, and disease outbreaks sicken healthy animals, as
has happened in Washington, D.C., and is happening in Hillsborough and
Miami-Dade counties in Florida now. In Austin, Texas, the city shelter stopped
accepting cats and then, two weeks later, dogs. Where do they all go? In
parts of Oregon where shelters have stopped accepting stray cats, they go into
the woods or into a bucket of water.
There
are literally hundreds more unwanted
animals born every minute of every day. Once every available
home or basement has been filled with animals from the shelter, where are all the
new animals and their litters going to go?
What's
a community to do? To truly save dogs' and cats' lives, let's reject this
shelter "save-rate" nonsense and get to the root of the problem: the
population explosion. Open-admission
shelters,
solid animal-control services, community education and reduced-cost spay-and-neuter programs are
the keys to a real "save" rate.
