162 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 112 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Another Century of War

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments

Donald Archer
Message Donald Archer
You cannot grasp the magnitude, the scope, and the implications of Bush/Cheney policy unless you are familiar with three things: The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), The Carlyle Group, and America's historic involvement in the Middle East, complicated by this administration's intimate association with the Religious Right.

The Project for a New American Century is a think-tank for aggressive 'defense,' initiated in 1997 by, among others, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. These men---all top Bush I, later Bush II, administration officials with corporate defense connections---essentially formulated the current policy.

At first glance the PNAC's statement of intent seems innocuous enough---to promote "American global leadership." But if you probe further, it's clear that PNAC views U.S. world dominance, a Pax Americana---militarily and economically, if not politically and culturally---as the goal.

All of this conveniently dovetails with a Religious Right worldview: Armageddon and the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Iraq happens to be the latter-day Babylon of Revelation infamy. If I were a foreign citizen---one needn't be a Muslim fundamentalist---I'd be concerned about the implications.

The essence of PNAC philosophy is found in its position paper, "Rebuilding America's Defenses" (September 2000)---it can be downloaded off the PNAC's website, www.newamericancentury.org.

Though the PNAC's concern is global, not surprisingly, a significant part of its attention is focused on the strategic and religious hotbed of the Middle East:

"While the unresolved conflict with Iraq [this was published in 2000] provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." (p. 26)

Further, "the process of transformation [of U.S. defense and foreign policy], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." (p. 63)

A year later came the attacks of September 11. It is clear that the "War on Terrorism" implements a global strategy conceived long before 9/11; and from a Religious Right perspective, this is a "holy war"---a crusade against evil.

The paper calls for "American military preeminence that is consistent with the requirements of a strategy of American global leadership." It then lists three main missions: 1) global missile defenses [i.e. "Star Wars"], 2) control of space and cyberspace [i.e. total control of information], and 3) pursuing a two-stage strategy of transforming conventional forces [i.e. enormous defense budget]. (p. 63)

This is music to the ears of private defense contractors.

Enter The Carlyle Group, the investment firm located in Washington, D.C., on Pennsylvania Avenue, conveniently midway between the White House and the Capital building.

The Carlyle Group links U.S. military policy with vast personal fortunes---its forte is pairing the powerful with the rich. A number of its big players are from Texas and/or have interests in oil. Among those with Carlyle connections: former President George Bush, the Saudi bin Laden family, former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

Since its founding in 1987, Carlyle has dealt in billions of dollars of defense related projects. During, and between, the two Bush presidencies, its value has skyrocketed---returning an average profit of 34 percent per year over the past decade.

The Group buys undervalued defense-related businesses, and resells them for a profit. It relies on wealthy investors, powerful influence, and inside information---knowing where public money is likely to be spent, or be cut. It's one of Washington's biggest 'revolving doors.'

The Group blossomed in the lull of the late eighties 'peace dividend.' With the ending of the U.S.-Soviet arms race, the defense industry was in a slump. Carlyle bought devalued businesses, saw PNAC agenda on the horizon, and gloated as the Middle East crisis heated up.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Donald Archer Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Donald Archer is a painter, observer, and commentator living on California's Central Coast. His work may be seen at www.DonaldArcher.com.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Leo Strauss and the "Crazies in the Basement"

Branding America

Another Century of War

Our Right to Know, and Debate: The Media's Role in a Democratic Society

"Voodoo" Politics

David vs. Goliath: Corporate Personhood at Odds with Democracy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend