Now our nation needs the truth about the attacks of 9/11 and other incidents so as to form the best policy in regards to our security. Already another presidential commission has assured us that the government was not involved in the attacks. It is time to use a different method to get the truth before the perpetrators strike again.
We could use a grand jury in New York to gather testimony and allow the panel to decide whom to indict and then send the accused to trial. But while it sounds ideal to use our legal system in this way, our court system has shown little success in convicted agents of the government and there is little reason for this to be any different.
The solution is to let the public decide.
Let the "conspiracy" researchers like Michael Ruppert, James Fetzer and Alex Jones form a team, allow them to assemble their final conclusion based on fulfilling the elements of crimes and then allow them to be cross-examined by government officials and anyone else who believes the official theory. The government could then present its own evidence and after a reasonable amount of cross-examination, the two sides would finish their cases.
Then let the public cast its votes on who told the truth. We would have polling places in the same manner as elections and only persons sworn to neutrality would count the votes as to which side it believed. No matter the tally, people would still debate 9/11 but because two sides would compete in an adversarial process, we would all know more about the truth than ever before.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
