Â
Townhalls are supposed to be about dialogue and conversation. These people were not in attendance for that reason. They booed when Specter and Sebelius walked out on the stage. They booed at almost anything they said.
Â
When people were invited to line up to ask questions, a huge line-up of mostly angry right wingers queued up to ask their questions. Most were talking points taken right off the pages of the right wingers in DC.
Â
Sebelius did a brilliant job spinning answers to the tough questions, putting health care reform in a positive light.
Â
Specter started off by saying that he thought Single Payer should be on the table. He didn't say it once. He repeated it several times. I think it's a strategic move-- a smart one. Two weeks ago, Joe Sestak, who announced that he'll be running against Specter in the PA Senate primary, voted against a committee amendment offered by Dennis Kucinich, which called for giving states the right to pursue single payer insurance solutions without being hampered by ERISA regulations. That puts Sestak, so far, squarely opposed to single-payer. Yesterday's statement by Specter put him somewhat on the good side of single-payer supporters-- the position most progressives in PA take.
Â
Does that mean Specter will support Single-Payer if it comes up for a vote? We don't know the answer. No-one asked at the town hall. But there is a single payer health bill in the senate. Specter announced that he'll be visiting all 67 counties in PA during the coming months. Someone should ask him, if he thinks single payer should be on the table, why he isn't a signatory on the senate's single payer bill.
Â
It's a smart move for Specter to take a seemingly more progressive stance on healthcare than Sestak. Now, smart progressives should nail Specter down on where he really stands.
Â
after the townhall, the teabagger wingnuts, and they really were wingnuts, gathered outside with signs.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
4
2
1
