The report also found that "The regulatory double standard is a microcosm of why the integrity of HACCP is at risk. The ConAgra-USDA cover up sustains a pattern of using HACCP as a vehicle to obstruct its staff from enforcing food safety laws at big business, while bullying small business such as family firms."
Putting Knowledge and Experience Out to Pasture
One of Taylor's objectives in mandating HACCP was to reduce and eventually eliminate inspectors' traditional role at plants and to limit them to auditing paperwork completed by plant personnel. Instead of being able to remove from the line any feces-covered carcass, inspectors are now instructed to "let the system work." As Taylor writes, "USDA will focus on verifying through its inspection activity that every company-designed HACCP plan is appropriate and working properly and that each company is meeting its food safety performance standards."[12] But auditing paperwork completed by company personnel showing its record of meeting performance standards is hardly the same as having the authority to immediately remove obviously contaminated product.
Another objective of Taylor's deregulation program was to reduce personnel. Taylor maintains that "For USDA, taking an HACCP approach will permit more efficient deployment of inspectors, allowing them to focus on the most important food safety concerns in the plants they monitor."[13] "Efficient deployment" translates into allowing inspectors to retire and not replacing them. Furthermore, when new inspectors are hired, they are trained only in HACCP.
In a report entitled � ���"Federal Meat Inspectors Spread Thin as Recalls Rise,� �� � OMB Watch discovered that � ���"While Congress has appropriated significantly more money since the early 1980s, the agency has not spent proportionally for personnel. In the early 1980s, FSIS spent about 69% of its appropriated funds to pay its employees. However, the percentage has steadily dropped. By FY 2007, the agency only spent 57% on employee compensation. And correlated with this decline is a drop in the number of agency workers.� �� �[14]
While the number of workers declined, however, their responsibility increased � ��" dramatically. OMB Watch notes that � ���"in FY 1981, FSIS employed about 190 workers per billion pounds of meat and poultry inspected and passed. By FY 2007, FSIS employed fewer than 88 workers per billion pounds, a 54% drop.� �� �
As a consequence, OBM Watch
reports that � ���"The ability of processors and manufacturers to circumvent the
FSIS inspection process is aided by widespread inspector shortages. According to The Baltimore Sun, � ��˜inspectors interviewed said that because of
vacancies in the ranks, inspectors are often forced to do the work of two or
three staff members, making it all the more difficult for them to catch the
signs of disease either in the animals before slaughter, or in meat that has
been butchered.'� �� �
In a highly informative report "Safety Last: The Politics of E. Coli and Other Food-Borne Killers," The Center for Public Integrity interviewed James Marsden, who was also interviewed by Moss for his New York Times' article. According to the Center for Public Integrity, Marsden made the important observation that "there is a distinction between animal-disease protection and prevention -- which is what USDA inspectors have been doing for decades -- and food-safety protection, which is what HACCP seeks to address. Animal disease protection is making sure that diseased cattle with tumors, abscesses, and other problems don't get into the food chain. Food safety is making sure that bacteria don't get into it. Both should work together."[15]
Marsden also speculated that "Maybe [those in the industry] see this as an opportunity to say we can use HACCP and food safety as a way to deregulate the meat and poultry industry.� �� �[16]
A tragic consequence of the decline in the number of inspectors is the corresponding decrease in the agency's ability to meet critical needs, such as adequately performing ante-mortem inspections that ensure animals entering the plants are healthy enough to walk through the doors on their own accord. The only parties that benefit from this situation are the meat and poultry cartel players; Americans suffer and even die without real inspection or meaningful enforcement.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
