-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Either this nation shall kill racism, or racism shall kill this nation." (S. Jonas, August, 2018) (This warning, which I have putting in the headers of my columns for quite some time, has never been more apt than it is now. See: Trump's "Madison Square Garden Rally" of October 27, 2024.)
"A Vote for 'ABBB' (Any Body But Biden) is a Vote for Trump and Republo-Fascism" (S. Jonas, March, 2024)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concerning Trump, as a person, as History's Greatest Con Man, and as a politician, I have written on the theme of Trump-as-a-RACIST multiple times. I was about to do so again, using in part some previously written but fairly recent text, when I came across a column on that theme that I published on the old BuzzFlash@Truthout on Thursday, 04/28/2011. Since Trump's racism hasn't changed (OK, some might argue that it has become more deeply ingrained since, starting with the 2016 campaign, he has discovered how well it works for him), before going further on the theme I thought that it might be useful to re-visit this one. Appropriately, it begins with the origins of the racism that has infected this country since "1619," and, with its vigorous promotion by Trump and his Republican Party still, most unfortunately, does. (Remember, this column is from 2011.) I am re-posting it here, with only the slightest of editing jobs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not so long ago in a land not at all far away part of it was ruled by a tiny oligarchy of very wealthy large landowners. They made their wealth in part off the backs of unpaid farm laborers for whom they provided nothing more than minimal food and shelter, in part by trading in those laborers as property, and in part off the backs of another group of (much smaller) landowners/small farmers, who were generally poor, although definitely better off than the aforementioned unpaid laborers. Actually, the latter two groups had much in common. They worked hard, got nothing (in the case of the first) and precious little (in the case of the second) for their labors. They were both dominated and exploited by the oligarchy. One would have thought, in fact, that the two groups of laborers might actually join forces and struggle to improve their respective states in life.
But of course this did not happen in the slave-holding South (or the other non-Southern slave-holding states before the First Civil War either). For in the South in particular, the ruling oligarchy had, over a period of two centuries since slaves were first brought to North America in 1619, very carefully nurtured the false doctrine of "white supremacy." Among other things the doctrine held that "white" people were inherently superior to "black" people. They trumpeted this doctrine even though there had been interbreeding between European settlers and African slaves from the earliest days and the coloring became quite muddled. Given that inbreeding, the grouping "black people" in particular was a totally artificial construct and of course still is. But logic and facts never troubled the Right back then any more than they do now.
Whatever could be said about the status and living standards of the poor whites in the South, the oligarchy could and did always buy them off with the notion that whatever else was going on in their lives, they were somehow "superior" to the "blacks." was the trump card. (More on how it became the Trump card, below.) For the First Civil War the oligarchy managed this ideological trick so well that about 250,000 poor whites went to their deaths trying to perpetuate the institution of slavery on the territory (and Territories) of the then-United States. Of course, the only beneficiaries of that system were the white Oligarchs, the Slave Power.
Then, after the end of the War, during Reconstruction when some efforts were made by both poor whites and newly freedmen to form alliances, the oligarchy very quickly re-mobilized the doctrine, backed up by the Ku Klux Klan and other terror organizations, to make sure that the poor whites either continued to be bewitched by it or were themselves terrorized in submission. Of course, the doctrine of White Supremacy and its power over the "white" people of the U.S. has never gone away. In fact, its presence and wide-spread influence on the thinking of United States folk of all kinds to this very day is a major indicator of how the South actually won the First Civil War. As many others have said, the Southern oligarchy lost the war, but over time has won the peace.
And so we come down to the present time. Instead of the Slave Power oligarchy ruling one section of the country and controlling much of its politics nationally, until the first firing of the guns of South Carolina at Fort Sumter, we now have the Corporate Power oligarchy ruling the whole country and controlling virtually all its politics. And many "white" folks support the Corporate Power oligarchy even though, like the Southern oligarchy of old, its politics are contrary to the best interests of most of those "white" folk. And indeed, in major part, the Corporate Power does it with same old doctrine: "whatever else is going on in your life, you are inherently superior to that 'black' person over there just because you are 'white' and he or she is 'black.' And oh by-the-way, the doctrine now extends to 'brown' people, to immigrants, to Muslims, to homosexuals, and to what-have-you. You are 'white,' and you have supremacy over them too just because of that very fact."
Race is still the trump card for the Right, for the Corporate Power, and increasingly for the Religious Right as well --- see the current performance of Franklin Graham in re President Obama. (Recall that this column was written in 2011.) Whatever other cards anyone may lay on the table in front of the GOPTrumpParty rank-and-file to attempt to show them that the Corporate Oligarchy is just as much their enemy as it is the enemy of anybody who is not one of them, or one of their direct servants in the politico-legal-media-what's-left-of-US-industry sectors, the Oligarchy plays their Trump card, and almost always wins the game. Which brings us (I know that you were waiting for this one) to Donald Trump.
When I wrote this column, who knew how far on his travels on the winds of Racism and xenophobia would take him. Of course, it is important to note that his anti-immigrant rage is first and foremost based on racism, and intended to promote it. He never rails at the European, and Asian immigrants who still regularly immigrate to this country. Trump [again remember that this was originally written in 2011], a former Health Care Single-Payer supporter, a former pro-choicer, a former supporter of other liberal causes, may or may not be running for the GOP nomination for President. There are certainly plenty of observers who think that that is not the case if only because he would have to reveal a good deal about his personal life. And since those details are apparently quite murky, if not quirky, in the sense of his relationship to his variable real estate and gambling casino holdings and the banks with which he deals and had has dealt on them, he just might not want to do that. But be that as it may, for now he seems to be actively running.
Of course, a variety of details about sex and his personal life have come out [since this column was originally written]. For example, he has been convicted of sexual assault and of concealing a sexual encounter with an adult film star for political purposes. Neither seem to have made any difference to his loyal following. Why is that so? What is he using as his own Trump Card? Why, in the absence of the usual attractive features put forth by conventional politicians, it seems certain that his Trump card is the classic one of white supremacy/racism.
For example, what else did the so-called "birther issue" stand for? Yes, the State of Hawaii produced the proof that certifies that a birth certificate exists in their files (and subsequently, President Obama produced the original). Yes, there were the also the contemporaneous birth announcements. But the Right knows better than to confuse any of adherents with facts. They keep on pretending that there is something there when of course there isn't and they are continuing to do so even after the release of the "long form." They are not the first to use the Big Lie Technique. Brought to its highest peak of proficiency by Hitler and Goebbels (and note, at least according to his first wife, Ivana, one of the few books he ever read was Hitler's Mein Kampf (My Struggle), the "Big Lie" doctrine proclaimed that with the bigger lie one told, if one told it over and over again, with conviction, that the people you wanted to reach would come to believe it, and their support for you would be increased. [Note the obvious, that Trump and his people now use the Big Lie technique over-and-over again, as in, for example, "the 2020 election was stolen."]
Trump knew full well what the facts about Pres. Obama's place of birth were. But how better to distinguish himself from the rest of the undistinguished 2012 GOP field (which eventually produced the totally colorless Mitt Romney) than to openly play the race card, using the dog whistle of "birtherism" resting on the foundation of the Doctrine of White Supremacy that, as noted, has been in place in this country since long before the First Civil War. Trump planted the seed and it sprouted very well in 2011-12, so well in fact that about 75% of GOP voters either believed that Obama was not a US citizen or had doubts about the fact. The attack is on Obama's legitimacy as a person, and "we all know what that means, don't we."
And then came the Trump attack on Obama's credentials for and in higher education. As Trump said: "I have friends who have smart sons with great marks, great boards, great everything and they can't get into Harvard. We don't know a thing about this guy. There are a lot of questions that are unanswered about our president." Must have been affirmative action, donchaknow. How else could he have gotten into Columbia College and Harvard Law School? And never did release his transcripts (as if they were anybody's business). He must have made President of the Harvard Law Review and Magna cum Laude by affirmative action too. And we know what THAT all means. (Of course, "affirmative action" has always not meant granting admissions or jobs preferentially to discriminated-against minorities, but rather simply giving them equal opportunity to apply for and be considered on their own merits. However, that fact has never stopped the racists from using "affirmative action" as a weapon in their race war. [And by golly, they are still doing it.])
Yes indeed. Race is the Trump card for the Right and for Trump himself, just as it was for the Slave-holding Oligarchy, and is for the Corporate Oligarchy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A note for now: RACE was the Trump card back then, and it goes without saying, it is indeed the Trump card now. One only has to skim the contents of the Trump Madison Square Garden Rally of Oct. 27, 2024 to know the truth of that statement. And if you don't think that the Trump-GOP leadership knew exactly what they were doing when they staged that rally --- that it historically echoed the famous US/Nazi (old) Madison Square Garden Rally of February 20, 1939 --- you have another think coming. All that was missing from the Trump rally were the swastikas.
Post Article Comment and Rate This Article
