"We had -- had already taken -- Joe [Wyatt], being one of them, was already broken down. He was already taken out. So the next step was the easy one. Once Brad got these pictures, Billy was next in line."
- From the deposition of Sukhbir Dhillon
The conversion of El Camino Real from a publicly controlled LAUSD high school to a publicly funded private school left behind a deeply divided community. One side argued that the school was already highly regarded and feared its stellar record would be compromised by becoming a charter school. The other was envious of its crosstown rival, Granada Hills High, which had already gone down the road of privatization, ridding itself of unpopular policies like bussing minority students onto its campus.
When being deposed as a witness in a lawsuit against El Camino, Sukhbir Dhillon, who teaches science at the charter school, described the division in this way:
So the school... ended up being divided up. And the red team was made up of people that were basically pro UTLA, but really against the administration.
And we felt, because I was probably more -- I leaned more blue team, we felt that they were actually against our school charter, as well.
And the blue team were people that were pro El Camino. We didn't want to be part of the union, but we wanted an alliance.
So there was that divide there that occurred. And the two sides did not get along very well.
These divisions were exasperated in 2016 after former "Executive Director" David Fehte was caught with his ï ? ? žï ? ? hand in the charter school's cookie jar. What started as a story centered on extravagant spending at the taxpayers' expense quickly became an example of outright corruption. Not only was the public paying for Fehte to dine at expensive restaurants, fly first class, and stay at luxurious hotels, he had the publicly funded charter school pay for airline tickets so that he could scout for the San Antonio Spurs. The NBA team then reimbursed him personally for the expenses he had not paid.
With the overwhelming evidence against Fehte, it should have been easy for the school's community to coalesce around holding it's leader accountable. Instead, the "Blue Team" attacked the critics instead of condemning Fehte's actions. One parent aligned with these teachers excused the corruption by saying that Fehte deserved the "rewards" for the success he had allegedly brought to the school.
The fight turned nasty as those loyal to Fehte used intimidation in an attempt to silence his critics. One parent reported that her employer was contacted by someone saying that her "attacks" on the charter school looked bad for their business. A teacher was approached in the parking lot and threatened by a mother that if he did not stop publicly criticizing Fehte, she would go to the authorities to report that the teacher had attacked her daughter. Similar slanderous attacks were used online against me for daring to cover the scandal in a series of articles.
As authorizers of El Camino, the LAUSD failed the school's community throughout the scandal. The Charter School Division sat on the Notice to Cure that covered the financial improprieties for over a year, only acting when the information was published through an article in the Daily News. Forced to act, the School Board was set to vote on revoking the school's charter when a last-minute agreement was reached that resulted in Fehte's termination. Before the Board voted to approve this agreement, information that Fehte's departure came with a golden parachute was withheld from the public. Instead of facing criminal charges, he walked away with a $215k payment because his firing was "without cause."
The LAUSD also stood by as the remaining leadership at the school covered up their failure to prevent Fehte's actions. After unanimously voting to contract with Oracle Investigations Group, Inc. for a $20,000 forensic audit of Fehte's spending, the El Camino Board refused to release the results to the public. They falsely claimed that they had hired its lawyers to sign the contract with the auditor, shielding the final report from the public's prying eyes. The LAUSD refused to do anything about El Camino's violation of California disclosure laws.
Emboldened by this lack of meaningful oversight, others have stepped into Fehte's shoes as they use the charter to enrich their bank accounts. One pervasive complaint is that contracts are being signed with businesses owned or operated by relatives of those with the power to suggest or approve contracts.
The lawlessness has also fostered an environment where leadership and staff act more like the students they are supposed to be molding into adults. Cliques run rampant, and those who have fallen out of favor with leadership are subjected to harassment, including threats to their reputations and careers.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
Post Article Comment and Rate This Article
