Would you like to know how many people have visited this page? Or how reputable the author is? Simply
sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
 SHARE 
|
|
OpEd News Member for 769 week(s) and 0 day(s)
6 Articles, 0 Quick Links, 17 Comments, 0 Diaries, 0 Polls
Articles Listed By Date
List By Popularity
List By Popularity
(1 comments) SHARE
Friday, July 24, 2015
Elephant In The Room: The Pentagon's Massive Carbon Footprint The Pentagon uses 80% of the fuel consumed by the federal government, yet its CO2 emissions and contribution to climate change are routinely ignored by corporate media and environmental activists.
Friday, July 24, 2015Elephant In The Room: The Pentagon's Massive Carbon Footprint The Pentagon uses 80% of the fuel consumed by the federal government, yet its CO2 emissions and contribution to climate change are routinely ignored by corporate media and environmental activists.
(14 comments) SHARE
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Top 10 Reasons Why U.S. Majority Pushed Back On Syria Leading reasons why a majority in the US opposed even a "limited" US strike on Syria.
Thursday, September 19, 2013Top 10 Reasons Why U.S. Majority Pushed Back On Syria Leading reasons why a majority in the US opposed even a "limited" US strike on Syria.
(12 comments) SHARE
Thursday, June 13, 2013
How broke does the U.S. have to be to cut military spending? The need to bring our war dollars home is urgent. The Pentagon's budget continues to gobble up 56.5% of federal spending while austerity grows. Sequestration did not fix the problem, and military spending is a lousy jobs program. Congress can fix this by voting no on the FY14 National Defense Authorization Act which has $637.5 billion for more drones, nukes, missile "defense" and wars.
Thursday, June 13, 2013How broke does the U.S. have to be to cut military spending? The need to bring our war dollars home is urgent. The Pentagon's budget continues to gobble up 56.5% of federal spending while austerity grows. Sequestration did not fix the problem, and military spending is a lousy jobs program. Congress can fix this by voting no on the FY14 National Defense Authorization Act which has $637.5 billion for more drones, nukes, missile "defense" and wars.
(2 comments) SHARE
Saturday, June 23, 2012
In 10 years security conditions have worsened for Afghan women Guest article by Dr. Mariam Raqib examines the question whether Afghan women have made progress under NATO occupation. Based on travel in Afghanistan from Sep.-Dec., 2011, as well as research over a six year period, Raqib argues that over ten years security conditions have not improved and have, in some cases, even worsened for Afghan women.
Saturday, June 23, 2012In 10 years security conditions have worsened for Afghan women Guest article by Dr. Mariam Raqib examines the question whether Afghan women have made progress under NATO occupation. Based on travel in Afghanistan from Sep.-Dec., 2011, as well as research over a six year period, Raqib argues that over ten years security conditions have not improved and have, in some cases, even worsened for Afghan women.
(1 comments) SHARE
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
BRING OUR WAR $$ HOME: How's the war economy working for you? Connects the budget crisis faced by our communities to out of control military spending by the federal government, and urges a campaign to stop spending on wars in order to fund needs here at home.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010BRING OUR WAR $$ HOME: How's the war economy working for you? Connects the budget crisis faced by our communities to out of control military spending by the federal government, and urges a campaign to stop spending on wars in order to fund needs here at home.
(3 comments) SHARE
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
NOTHING UP MY SLEEVE: ROLLING STONE AND THE WAR SUPPLEMENTAL Previously unpublished analysis of the recent Rolling Stone article on Gen. Stanley McChrystal and the timing of its publication just as the war supplemental funding bill came up for a vote in Congress. Examines the use of false dichotomy e.g. Obama v. McChrystal to mislead the American public.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010NOTHING UP MY SLEEVE: ROLLING STONE AND THE WAR SUPPLEMENTAL Previously unpublished analysis of the recent Rolling Stone article on Gen. Stanley McChrystal and the timing of its publication just as the war supplemental funding bill came up for a vote in Congress. Examines the use of false dichotomy e.g. Obama v. McChrystal to mislead the American public.
