Each non-physical human 'me' has to co-exist with a physical body, and with a mind that, though also non-physical, uses the Electro-chemical makeup of the human brain to link 'me' with body. So it is the mind that links non-physical Spirit, or non-physical Soul, or as we prefer, non-physical 'me' to physical existence via the human body. Medical science has demonstrated the technological ability to keep a brain-dead human body alive and ticking over for weeks, months or years as required, long after non-physical 'me' has departed to the Astral. A healthy human being that has lost the ability to think or to reason with coherence and clarity may well continue for a lifetime to exist on the combined mind and body instinctual level. Equally a clear thinking human 'me' with a generous and loving nature, that controls a clear mind, may co-exist with a crippled or shattered and uncontrollable human body for a lifetime. Now let's look at another form of trio.
Nowadays we hear of advanced computerised technology built into the design of automobiles. The computer monitors the functioning and requirements of the vehicle, but also it monitors the requirements of the human driver. The computer will warn the driver when the engine needs oil or water. If the driver chooses to ignore the warning the computer will eventually cut the ignition to protect the engine. This is part of the computer's protective role regardless of the driver's choices. A higher protective function of the same computer, on behalf of its human driver, is to make contact, via a space satellite, with a source of traffic information as to the best route to reach the driver's chosen destination. But always it is the driver not the computer that chooses the destination.
But if the human driver wants to contact the source he or she must always make contact via the computer. Just as in meditation, 'me' must make contact via the mind, because mind is your link with daily life and is also your link with higher dimensions.
Also the computer will only connect with the source when directed to by the driver. Probably the computerised version exists that will safely stop the automobile if its driver became incapable of maintaining control. A similar version may remain linked to the source ready with information for the driver to use or to ignore. Do you see the point we are making? The computer is an emotionless linkage between an emotionless vehicle and its emotional driver. Neither the vehicle nor the computer cares whether the driver drives directly to the destination or stops to pick daisies on route. It is all one to them.
The vehicle's role is to reach the chosen current destination, and the computer's role is to monitor the process. The emotions of anger or of irritated frustration felt towards other drivers are the products of the human driver. The human trio is many-layered and is far more complex. The differences are that the mind does the monitoring but the mind can't think, it can only sense and feel, because it can only respond to the energy flow range at the emotional level. The human body left to itself responds to the energy flow range only at the instinctual level of bodily needs and appetites. As we will see, just like the kettle draws power from the power station, the self-created human trio draws this flow of energy from the Creator via the Creator's imagined idea.
The unmonitored human mind is fiercely protective and will go to extraordinary lengths to protect the trio. If mind senses that body feels pain, mind triggers the body's escape-or-fight mechanism without consulting "thinking me". In a similar manner, if mind senses that "thinking me" may be hurt, again mind will trigger the same limited mechanism, and again without consulting "thinking me". Mind is fully equipped to handle bodily needs and instinctual appetites but whilst undirected and unguided by 'me' it is not equipped to handle the more subtle higher requirements of "thinking me". In a similar way the computer isn't able to comprehend the driver's thoughts. The difference is that the computer won't try to comprehend where as the human mind will try to comprehend. Mind will try to do something about it, even though it may fail miserably simply because it cannot comprehend thought processes. Let's look at energy.
Air will always be drawn to fill a vacuum. Energy will always be drawn to where it is needed. When you switch on your electric kettle for tea, the power station doesn't pump electricity into the kettle's element. The element draws exactly what electricity it needs from the power station. But the electric kettle began as an imagined idea born of someone's intelligence. For a physical universe to exist, it had to be born from an imagined idea. To imagine requires an intelligence that can think coherently. But more than this is needed if the idea is to move out of the realm of imagination to become a manifest physical reality. What more is needed? Whether the idea imagined is an electric kettle or a physical universe, the idea must be continuously held in the intelligence that thought of the idea. Whilst the idea continues to be visualised it will draw energy in some form from its creator's intelligence. But when the electric kettle becomes a usable physical reality it no longer needs to be visualised. This is relevant to our human trio.
Now we must follow this train of thought to see where it takes us. What would be the point of the creation of a physical universe by a non-physical Creator? Equally how do we define the term, non-physical? Do we mean non-physical from our limited physical viewpoint, or do we mean non-physical from our Creator's unlimited viewpoint? Simply by asking this question the answer to it must obviously be the latter. For a physical human to make a physical chair to sit upon, non-physical intelligence must be applied before and whilst the chair is physically constructed and until it is a chair to be physically sat upon. So the requirement is physical, the applied intelligence is non-physical, and the construction and the result are physical.
Our non-physical Creator doesn't need electric kettles, chairs, or physical universes. So why use energy creating them, unless they are stepping stones towards the required result that is non-physical? Put simply we could state these required intended results as, physical to non-physical, result = physical. Or, non-physical to physical, result = non-physical.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
