Feature Article
Will the third time be the charm for detained Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou? First, the UK High Court refused her legal team's request to see relevant HSBC documents, since it was her now infamous PowerPoint presentation to one of their officers, bizarrely at a cafe' in Hong Kong, when the bank has hundreds of offices in their massive skyscraper nearby, that is the basis of all the accusations.
More on that in my next expose', which will come out soon, and which will reveal everything you need to know about this incorrigible bank, past and present.
Meng's team then made the same request to Hong Kong's courts, which agreed that HSBC's internal records were relevant to her (trumped up-US) extradition case in Vancouver, Canada, maybe because as Hongkongers, they know all about HSBC's sordid history, going back to the Opium Wars and the UK's global drug cartel, which dramatically and negatively affected China's modern history.
Those records were just released and it is good news for Meng. When mainstream media - and lapdog vassal Canada at that - admits,
"Meng Wanzhou is detained on what increasingly look to be trumped-up, politically motivated charges.
In a related video, same said Canadian journalists predicted that the newly released HSBC-sourced documents are more than enough for Canadian Minister of Justice/Attorney General David Lametti to release Meng posthaste and if not, she will surely get released on appeal to their Supreme Court. Never mind that Western justice is as crooked as a crippled dog's hind leg, but the fact that after 2.5 years, it is being MSM-discussed is very encouraging, indeed.
So, for third time's the charm, will the presiding judge, Associate Chief Justice of B.C. Supreme Court Heather Holmes allow evidence that is apparently what is needed to get Meng freed? She should, but the fact of the matter is,
1) this is a patently US-driven geopolitical vendetta to damage, extort Huawei and destroy China's image in the West's Big Lie Propaganda Machine (BLPM), and too often Empire does not know when to call it quits,
2) Judge Holmes seems to have a less than ethical reputation,
3) the whole ordeal has been a kangaroo court from day one and,
4) Ottawa is a weak, step-and-fetch-it for Washington,
Which means anything could happen, for better or for worse, concerning Meng.
Without going into a lot of detail, the internal HSBC emails, memos and other documents demonstrate that Meng did not lie or commit fraud in her coffee table presentation, which was surely a set-up at the behest of the US Departments of Justice and Treasury. Why? Because we now know that HSBC, up to high level management, already fully knew everything Meng said that day. How is it fraud if the information shared is fully known by both parties? One has to be duped, tricked or lied to, for there to be fraud.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
