You cannot ship for sale an adulterated product.
5. FDA'S NEW RULE ON SANITARY TRANSPORT OF FOOD. ASPARTAME VIOLATES THE RULE
http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_new_rule_on%20food_transport.htm
6. FDA VIOLATES DATA QUALITY ACT http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_violates_data_quality_act.htm
Further for FDA to seal the teratology birth defects studies knowing aspartame caused neural tube defects, spina bifida and cleft palate without even a pregnancy warning is truly a hideous crime. As far as any other information not in the 2002 petition, there are 16 years of scientific peer reviewed studies proving aspartame triggers or precipitates many diseases from obesity and cancer to dementia, myocardial infarctions, strokes and metabolic disease - just for starters.
FDA has stated for over 30 years that if something is shown scientifically, they could take another look at aspartame. How can FDA make such statements when almost all independent and unbiased studies have shown every horror. FDA has turned a blind eye and deaf ear and ignored the independent scientific peer reviewed research. Jana Marie Kincaid wrote she shredded the studies for G. D. Searle, sending one copy to France, and that aspartame killed everything it touched.
For example, please consider the Trocho Study, which clearly proves that the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_and_preembalming.htm
What kind of excuse can FDA come up with on an excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic drug masquerading as an additive, pre-embalming the body and turning the tissue to plastic as discussed in "When Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills", by Dr. Woodrow Monte. [ www.whilesciencesleeps.com]
FDA has an entire medical text, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" by the late world expert H. J. Roberts, M.D. and looking at the evidence then denies it exists! It was written so physicians and the public would even know the mechanism by which aspartame precipitates or triggers so many diseases. How can FDA stare the evidence in the face and deny it? The FDA promised Dr. John Olney that they would see to it no child would ever get aspartame; Dr. Olney tried to prevent approval of aspartame and it was never proven safe. Donald Rumsfeld got aspartame marketed through political chicanery. Instead today FDA continues to allow aspartame even in pediatric drugs with the full knowledge aspartame will destroy brain cells and that it interacts with drugs.
To even allow the death of babies from aspartame is grotesque:
http://www.wnho.net/sweetened_horror_story.htm
Does the FDA think when a dead baby is taken from his mother's arms and put into the ground she is thinking that this childs death is merely anecdotal?
A copy of this correspondence is going to Dr. Thomas, to show him this case is not closed until FDA rescinds the forced approval for this deadly poison. How FDA approves even more of the toxins like Advantame is repulsive. The FDA officials need to check the index of Dr. Roberts book, and read about its own part in covering up this hideous crime allowing the public to be mass poisoned.
Furthermore, just because FDA ignores scientific peer-reviewed research like three Ramazzini studies proving aspartame causes cancer (which was first admitted by the FDA officials themselves!) doesn't remove them from the record. FDA has been covering up independent studies for almost 40 years, and the people are still dying from it. The Ramazzini Studies were peer-reviewed by 7 world experts and the Institute is known worldwide for its accurate research on cancer. The author of them, Dr. Morando Soffritti even received an award only given twice before in history. Harvard also did a study linking aspartame to cancer.
All of this makes the FDA look foolish to the world; it has completely lost the respect of the public, but in truth, we have to conclude they truly dont care.
Dr. Thomas writes about regulations when in the case of aspartame they have repeatedly violated the law as their own chief scientist Dr. Adrian Gross told Congress in 1985. If science has shown aspartame is responsible for such gross things as having the body embalmed by formaldehyde, damage to DNA, cancer, interaction with drugs and vaccines, malignant brain tumors and horrible birth defects what else does science need to show for FDA to take action?
5. FDA'S NEW RULE ON SANITARY TRANSPORT OF FOOD. ASPARTAME VIOLATES THE RULE
http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_new_rule_on%20food_transport.htm
6. FDA VIOLATES DATA QUALITY ACT http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_violates_data_quality_act.htm
FDA has stated for over 30 years that if something is shown scientifically, they could take another look at aspartame. How can FDA make such statements when almost all independent and unbiased studies have shown every horror. FDA has turned a blind eye and deaf ear and ignored the independent scientific peer reviewed research. Jana Marie Kincaid wrote she shredded the studies for G. D. Searle, sending one copy to France, and that aspartame killed everything it touched.
For example, please consider the Trocho Study, which clearly proves that the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_and_preembalming.htm
What kind of excuse can FDA come up with on an excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic drug masquerading as an additive, pre-embalming the body and turning the tissue to plastic as discussed in "When Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills", by Dr. Woodrow Monte. [ www.whilesciencesleeps.com]
FDA has an entire medical text, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" by the late world expert H. J. Roberts, M.D. and looking at the evidence then denies it exists! It was written so physicians and the public would even know the mechanism by which aspartame precipitates or triggers so many diseases. How can FDA stare the evidence in the face and deny it? The FDA promised Dr. John Olney that they would see to it no child would ever get aspartame; Dr. Olney tried to prevent approval of aspartame and it was never proven safe. Donald Rumsfeld got aspartame marketed through political chicanery. Instead today FDA continues to allow aspartame even in pediatric drugs with the full knowledge aspartame will destroy brain cells and that it interacts with drugs.
To even allow the death of babies from aspartame is grotesque:
http://www.wnho.net/sweetened_horror_story.htm
Does the FDA think when a dead baby is taken from his mother's arms and put into the ground she is thinking that this childs death is merely anecdotal?
A copy of this correspondence is going to Dr. Thomas, to show him this case is not closed until FDA rescinds the forced approval for this deadly poison. How FDA approves even more of the toxins like Advantame is repulsive. The FDA officials need to check the index of Dr. Roberts book, and read about its own part in covering up this hideous crime allowing the public to be mass poisoned.
Furthermore, just because FDA ignores scientific peer-reviewed research like three Ramazzini studies proving aspartame causes cancer (which was first admitted by the FDA officials themselves!) doesn't remove them from the record. FDA has been covering up independent studies for almost 40 years, and the people are still dying from it. The Ramazzini Studies were peer-reviewed by 7 world experts and the Institute is known worldwide for its accurate research on cancer. The author of them, Dr. Morando Soffritti even received an award only given twice before in history. Harvard also did a study linking aspartame to cancer.
All of this makes the FDA look foolish to the world; it has completely lost the respect of the public, but in truth, we have to conclude they truly dont care.
Dr. Thomas writes about regulations when in the case of aspartame they have repeatedly violated the law as their own chief scientist Dr. Adrian Gross told Congress in 1985. If science has shown aspartame is responsible for such gross things as having the body embalmed by formaldehyde, damage to DNA, cancer, interaction with drugs and vaccines, malignant brain tumors and horrible birth defects what else does science need to show for FDA to take action?
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
3
3
2
