Over
the last six weeks, the revelations that long-term BBC personality and
'household name' Sir Jimmy Savile was in fact a long-term child abuser
have gripped and horrified the British public.
The vast majority of the British public knew Jimmy Savile as an
eccentric, yet highly regarded, former TV children's show presenter and
charity fundraiser. Savile's career began in 1958 as a DJ for Radio
Luxembourg. In 1968 he joined BBC Radio 1, where he presented
Savile's Travels. From 1969 to 1973 he fronted Speakeasy, a discussion programme for
teenagers. In 1964, he began presenting the first edition of the BBC music chart television programme
Top of the Pops. Savile also hosted other BBC television programs, the most notable of which was
children's show Jim'll Fix It,
which he presented from 1975 to 1994. Because of the nature of the
programs he hosted and his high-profile charity work, throughout his
career, Savile was
surrounded by children of different ages.
Mark Williams-Thomas
is the detective-turned-reporter who first publicly exposed Jimmy
Savile as a prolific sex offender in early October 2012 on the ITV
program
Exposure. William-Thomas, who is currently making a second program that will further investigate Savile's abuses,
recently stated that the evidence he has gathered suggests that Savile
engineered his entire career so that he could molest youngsters:
"In the previous programme it was unclear what came first," he said.
"But I can very clearly tell you now that he created his television
series as a vehicle for his offending.
"I believe he engineered his programmes within the BBC and Radio Luxembourg in order to gain access to children.
"The classic examples are Top of the Pops, Savile's Travels, Jim'll Fix It - all of them gave him access to young children. That's why there were so many victims."
In the weeks since the
Exposure program was
aired, dozens of individuals who claim they were abused in some way by
Savile have come forward. Police have stated that Savile may have
sexually abused up to 300 children over his 40-year career. The abuse
took place at a children's home patronized by Savile and others, on
outside broadcasts, at hospitals, etc. In addition, many of the abused
children (now adults) have claimed that they were molested and assaulted
by Savile and other BBC celebrities
on BBC premises.
Former and current BBC presenters and employees have stated that during
Savile's heyday at the BBC, many people at the corporation were aware of
Savile's molestation of children but that it was rationalised away as
'Jimmy just being Jimmy'. Another BBC star, '70s singer 'Gary Glitter', was convicted in the UK 1997 for downloading child pornography, and in
Vietnam in March 2006 for 'obscene acts' with two girls aged 11 and 12
and jailed. Glitter returned to London in August 2008 after his release
from prison. In 2009 Savile defended Glitter by saying: "
If you said to that copper, what's Gary Glitter done wrong? Well nothing really. He's just sat at home watching dodgy films."
Savile's star status combined with his universally lauded charity
fundraising (he raised -40 million over the years) made him
'untouchable' in his own words. It also gave him full access to the
hospitals, children's homes and other institutions that benefited from
his fundraising work. For example, Savile had his
own bedroom
at Stoke Mandeville hospital and the freedom of Leeds General
Infirmary. The evidence to date suggests that Savile was using this open
access to hospitals to prey on mentally and physically disabled
children. Several doctors
have also been implicated. Last month, a disabled woman, Caroline Moore,
said that in 1971, when she was 13, Savile had forcibly "
shoved
his tongue down [her] throat" while she was sitting in her wheelchair
following an operation. Another woman, June Thornton, described
witnessing a serious sexual assault on another patient she believed to
be brain damaged.
Jimmy Savile in his later years
Some
of the worst abuse took place in a network of children's home in Wales
where up to 650 children in 40 homes were sexually, physically and
emotionally abused over 20 years. Savile was a
regular visitor
at least one such home, Bryn Estyn, along with several other
'high-profile' individuals, including two former members of the
Conservative party. Keith Gregory was just 11 years old when he was
placed in Bryn Estyn. The horror he witnessed inside the care home
included gang rape, strip searches and vicious canings.
Children would be taken from their beds at night and driven to hotels
where they would be raped, or gang raped, by adult men, and then
returned to their beds sobbing. "
One particular night that I always recall is when I was basically raped, tied down and abused by nine different men,"
one victim said. Other victims of the children's homes have named former ex-Tory MP
Sir Peter Morrison
- Margaret Thatcher's Parliamentary Private Secretary - and at least
one other top conservative politician, as being involved in the abuse.
Keith Gregory has stated that he knows of at least 12 people who were
abused at Bryn Estyn who committed suicide as a result.
A government investigation (
the Waterhouse inquiry)
into the physical and sexual abuse of children in care homes in Clwyd
and Gwynedd, North Wales, including the Bryn Estyn children's home at
Wrexham, between 1974 an 1990 was conducted and published in 2000. The
report made recommendations to improve the functioning of the homes,
but all of the names of individuals accused of abuse were kept secret.
Savile has also been linked to the appalling abuse of children at the
Haut de la Garenne children's home in Jersey in the UK Channel Islands.
Children
there were raped and tortured in the most horrible ways. 'Dungeons' on
the premises containing bones have been discovered. Children were
regularly treated to 'boat trips' where rich and influential people
would rape them. Savile tried to sue the
Sun newspaper when they linked him to abuse there but he was
later forced to admit he had been a visitor when a picture of him at the home surrounded by children was published.
The Haut de la Garenne home was the subject of a police investigation
started in 2007 by Graham Power, then the chief officer, but was
suspended after he
complained
of political interference. In 2011, Leah McGrath Goodman, an American
journalist, claimed that she was banned from re-entering either the
United Kingdom or the Island and Bailiwick of Jersey for a period of two
years, while in the middle of undertaking research on the abuse
allegations.
Savile also managed to get his
own set of keys
to Broadmoor high-security psychiatric hospital. He also had a bedroom
and was on friendly terms with inmate Peter Sutcliffe, a serial killer
dubbed 'the Yorkshire Ripper', who was convicted of murdering 13 women
and attempting to murder seven others between 1975 and 1980. During the
investigation that eventually led to Sutcliffe's arrest in 1981, police
had not only questioned Savile as a suspect because he had been
mentioned by Sutcliffe in an interview, but had
taken a cast of his teeth
to compare to bite marks on the victims' bodies. Two of Sutcliffe's
victims, coincidentally, were found a few hundred yards from Savile's
home.
Savile with his friend, the Yorkshire Ripper, Peter Sutcliffe
Throughout
his reign of terror, Savile was viewed as something of a national
treasure by all. He was awarded an OBE and eventually knighted by the
Queen. Savile was also an unlikely member of the Athenaeum Club in
London, a flop house for famous Empire builders and toffy-nosed idiots
of all persuasions. Savile's name was suggested by former Archbishop of
Westminster Basil Hume. One current member recently
stated:
"A lot of us took the view that Savile would not be a natural habitu????
of a club that has counted Sir Winston Churchill, Lord Palmerston and
Lord Curzon as members, but the fact is we had no choice ..."
The reason other members had no choice was because Archbishop Hume
threatened to resign his membership if Savile were not approved as a
member. Why would an Archbishop insist that someone like Savile be made a
member of an exclusive Pall Mall gentleman's club? Of relevance may be
the fact that the good Archbishop was involved in 'hushing up' a sexual-abuse scandal at Ampleforth College in 1975. The
Yorkshire Post reported in 2005: "Pupils at a leading Roman Catholic school
suffered
decades of abuse from at least six pedophiles following a decision by
former Abbot Basil Hume not to call in police at the beginning of the
scandal."
The BBC
The initial response by BBC chiefs to the allegations against Savile was
to condemn the 'culture problem' that allowed Savile to prey on the
innocent on the BBC's watch and assure the public that a full
investigation would be forthcoming. It has since been exposed, however,
that the BBC played a significant role in preventing the truth about
Savile from being revealed. As a result, over the last week or so, the
focus on Savile and his possible accomplices has shifted onto the BBC
itself. This appears to have been by design.
In December 2011, the BBC had two programs planned for their Christmas
schedule that extolled the life and virtues of 'Sir' Jimmy Savile. At
the same time, an edition of the investigative program
Newsnight
was in the works that painted a more accurate picture of Savile's life
and 'tastes' and revealed that he has already been the subject of a
police investigation that was mysteriously dropped.
That a decision was taken by BBC bosses to 'pan' the 'Jimmy the
pedophile' program in favor of the two tribute shows is matter of
record. Who exactly made the decision, and why, is more difficult to
ascertain, mainly because every BBC editor or producer that had anything
to do with the programs is running for cover.
Former BBC Controller Greg Entwistle (he assumed the post in September
this year) was questioned by a House of Commons Select Committee about
what he knew about the decision to drop the investigative report.
Entwistle, who was 'Head of Vision' at the time, stated that he was told
by the head of news, Helen Boaden, that a
Newsnight program
was scheduled that was investigating serious allegations against Savile
and that, if aired, it would naturally require that the two programs
celebrating Savile's life be cancelled, but that was ALL he knew,
because, he really wasn't interested in knowing about the details
because he "didn't want to show undue interest" (!):
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EMf7Qa8t7RE?version" target="_blank">
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/EMf7Qa8t7RE?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" bgactive="url(chrome://flashblock/content/flashplay.png) no-repeat center" bginactive="url(chrome://flashblock/content/flash.png) no-repeat center"
Entwistle's explanation is not credible. If it was his job to decide
whether or not the schedule should be changed, surely he absolutely
needed to know just how serious the allegations against Savile were in
order to make the decision. A few days after Entwistle gave this
testimony, he fell on his sword and resigned his position as head man at
the BBC. Entwistle's pain was probably made considerably less by the
-1.3 million
in pension and severance pay for his trouble. All of which smacks of a
cover-up with Entwistle being the first, and perhaps only, head to roll
in an effort to appease (or distract) the public. But the problem of the
reason why the 'Savile the pedophile'
Newsnight program was panned still remains.
Peter Rippon is the
Newsnight program editor and, in theory,
had the final say on whether or not the program went ahead. On his BBC
blog on 2nd October, Rippon explained that he decided to cancel the
program because of lack of evidence. This was despite the fact that he
had previously been keen on airing the
Newsnight investigation,
which had gathered information on abuse by Savile from women who had
lived at the Duncroft girls' school in the 1970s.
But between 25 November and 30 November 2011 Rippon suddenly changed his
mind and demanded that reporters on the investigation prove that the
Crown Prosecution Service chose not to charge Savile in 2007 because he
was too old, a hurdle the
Newsnight team thought was unachievable.
Newsnight reporter Liz MacKean
believed that
Rippon
was feeling under pressure from his bosses, writing in an email to a
friend on 30 November that: "PR [Peter Rippon] says if the bosses aren't
happy ... [he] can't go to the wall on this one." But Rippon claims that he had always dropped the film for 'editorial reasons'. McKean has also
stated that Rippon played down Savile's abuses because they "
weren't the worst kind of sexual offences."
Newsnight editor Peter Rippon: apologist for child abusers?
On 22 October 'the BBC' issued a '
correction'
to Rippon's claims that more or less demolished his argument that there
was a lack of evidence. Since then, Entwistle and others have stated
that the program SHOULD have gone ahead. There are two important points
here.
1) If Rippon made the decision to cancel the program based on
what amounts to a lie that he propagated, then he should be investigated
for connections to pedophile networks because the only conclusion is
that he wanted to protect someone with connections to Savile.
2) If Rippon was told, directly or indirectly, to cancel the
program then he must be compelled to reveal who it was and that person
or persons needs to be investigated for pedophile network connections
associated with Savile.
The fact is that hundreds if not thousands of people in
the UK have known or suspected for decades that Jimmy Savile was a
pedophile. In light of the evidence recently revealed about the shocking
extent of Savile's predations and the evidence for connections to other
notable individuals, it is not plausible that the
Newsnight program
assembled for airing in December 2011 did not uncover more than enough
evidence to present a strong 'public interest' case against Savile. Yet
the program was cancelled in favor of two tribute programs. Savile
worked for many years at the BBC, where he flagrantly abused dozens of
children.
This puts the BBC, or individuals within the corporation, at the heart of what appears to be a cover-up.
In response to the scandal, on Sunday 28 October, the BBC commissioned
and then rushed out an investigative report into the allegations both
against itself and Savile. The program was made by Angus Stickler, a
former BBC journalist now based at the not-for-profit Bureau of
Investigative Journalism, who offered it to
Newsnight. It was
broadcast on Friday 2 November. A major part of the program was the
allegation by a former resident at Welsh children's home Bryn Estyn -
Steven Messham - that he had been
raped by a 'leading politician from the Thatcher years' and said the top Tory told him he'd be killed if he told police. The program did not name the man, but
certain individuals on Twitter were less than circumspect about the man's identity. Interestingly, these individuals were the
Guardian columnist George Monbiot, who tweeted: "
I looked up Lord McAlpine on t'internet. It says the strangest things", and wife of the House of Commons Speaker, Sally Bercow, who tweeted: "
Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *innocent face*."
As it turned out, Lord McAlpine, who was deputy chairman of the
Conservative party under Thatcher from 1979-83, had been misidentified by
Messham as his abuser, because police had shown him a picture of the
man he knew to be his abuser but incorrectly identified him as Lord
McAlpine. It seems that the lasting result of the rushed
Newsnight program
will be that anyone who in the future accuses high-level public figures
of pedophilia runs the risk of being hung out to dry as mistaken or
deluded.
Was it intended that way? Will scrutiny of the
BBC's 'culture problem' in '70s and '80s eclipse or serve as a suitable
distraction to any real investigation into the
statement by Labour MP Tom Watson to the House of Commons that a "
powerful paedophile network may have had links to a former prime minister, No 10 and parliament"?
In all of this, it should be remembered that the BBC is a public institution funded by taxpayer money.
The BBC is, therefore, ultimately a government-controlled corporation.
This fact was brought into clear focus in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq
invasion when Tony Blair and Alastair Campbell decided to respond to
massive public protest against the invasion by 'sexing up' the case for
war by falsely claiming that Iraq could hit the UK with WMDs in 45
minutes. The BBC played a key role in the battle to expose Blair's lies
over Iraq's 'WMDs', and it, and others, paid a heavy price for doing so.
'Suiciding' David Kelly
In May 2003, BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan had an unimpeachable source
that had told him that the Blair government's claims about Iraq were
provable lies. Gilligan said as much on 29 May 2003 on BBC Radio 4's
Today program.
Gilligan also stated that Blair's spin doctor and psychopath-in-chief
Alastair Campbell (officially 'Director of Communications') was the one
who inserted the '45-minute' claim. Campbell was furious and demanded
that the BBC and Gilligan retract the allegations. The BBC refused and
stood by Gilligan and the authenticity and reliability of his source,
but refused to name the source for his own protection.
The following day, 30 May 2003, the Ministry of Defence claimed that one
of its officials had come forward, admitting to having discussed the
matter of Iraq's weapons with Gilligan on May 22nd. Six weeks later the
MOD, on orders of the Blair government, outed Dr. David Kelly, a British
expert on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of
Defence, and former United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, as the
source. On July 15th Kelly was called before the parliamentary foreign
affairs select committee to be grilled on the issue. Two days later
Kelly's body was found dead in a wooded area near his home.
Rather than order a coroner's report, the Blair government set up the nominally 'public'
Hutton Inquiry,
led by James Brian Edward Hutton, or 'Baron Hutton', into the
circumstances surrounding Kelly's death. Hutton is the former Lord Chief
Justice of Northern Ireland where he used trials of accused IRA members
and inquiries into British army murders of innocent Catholics to perfect
the art of the whitewash. He was a natural choice for the job.
Dr. David Kelly before the parliamentary foreign affairs select committee in July 2003
Despite
the fact that Dr. Kelly had shown no sign of depression or wanting to
kill himself and that neither the cut on his wrist nor the small amount
of painkillers he had ingested could have killed him, Hutton's report,
published in January 2004, concluded that Kelly had taken his own life
and that the BBC and Gilligan were at fault.
On 15 October 2007, a Freedom of Information request revealed that the
knife that Kelly supposedly used to cut his wrists, the bottle of water
he is assumed to have drunk from while taking the pills, and the blister
packs of pills themselves
were all devoid of any fingerprints. Hutton also ignored the fact that Kelly was
found with electrode pads on his chest.
During the initial inquiry before Kelly's murder, a Foreign Office
official, David Broucher, reported a conversation with Kelly at a Geneva
meeting in February 2003. Broucher related that Kelly said he had
assured his Iraqi sources that there would be no war if they
co-operated, and that a war would put him in an 'ambiguous' moral
position. Broucher had asked Kelly what would happen if Iraq were
invaded, and Kelly had replied, "
I will probably be found dead in the woods."
Hutton's whitewash also included the stipulation that evidence related
to the death, including the post-mortem report and photographs of the
body,
should remain classified for 70 years.
Here's Tony Blair, shortly after Kelly's murder, being asked an uncomfortable question (note his response):
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/ElSAygXWS3Q?version" target="_blank">
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/ElSAygXWS3Q?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" bgactive="url(chrome://flashblock/content/flashplay.png) no-repeat center" bginactive="url(chrome://flashblock/content/flash.png) no-repeat center"
The scandal over the 'sexed up' Iraq dossier and the murder of Dr.
David Kelly made it clear to the psychopathic warmongers in the Blair
government that, if they were to be able to continue to lie to the
public about their imperial agenda, something had to be done about the
BBC. When the whitewashed Hutton report was published, it exonerated the
Blair government of any deception or 'sexing' up of the Iraq dossier
and condemned Gilligan's original accusation as 'unfounded' and the
BBC's editorial and management processes as 'defective'. This was, in
essence, the strong message.
Within a few days of the publication of the Hutton report, Gilligan,
Director General Greg Dyke and Chairman Gavyn Davies were left with no
option but to resign. Groups of staff staged walk-outs at BBC
broadcasting house in London and many other BBC offices around the
country. Staff also took out a full-page advertisement in the
Telegraph
that read (in part): "Greg Dyke stood for brave, independent and
rigorous BBC journalism that was fearless in its search for the truth.
We are resolute that the BBC should not step back from its determination
to investigate the facts in pursuit of the truth."
Prior to the David Kelly affair, the BBC still maintained some scope to
diverge from the official government line on major issues. With Dyke's
departure, however, the BBC soon became little more than a government
mouthpiece, and in the 8 years since then, has consolidated its position
as the UK's premier media outlet for
government propaganda and lies. Dyke's replacement in 2004 was Mark Thompson,
a dyed-in-the-wool 'Israel firster' who seems to have
spread his malignant ideology throughout the corporation. Thompson was still in charge at the BBC when the 'Savile the pedophile'
Newsnight program
was panned. Fortunately for Thompson, he has managed to avoid too many
uncomfortable questions over the Savile scandal (like why he didn't act
when he was
alerted to it twice this year) by fleeing the country to start a new job as Chief Executive of the
NY Times Company.
Pedophilia and child abuse is today, and apparently has been for many
years, a widespread and serious problem in our technologically advanced
yet morally decrepit Western society. More than any other social marker,
the way in which the weak and innocent are treated defines the
character of a civilization or people. The sad fact is that there is
evidence to suggest that what is publicly known about the sexual and
emotional abuse of children by the 'elite' of our world is very far from
the full story.
If the full story were known,
it would so horrify the normal people of this world that society could
not recover without a fresh start, preceded by a full-scale revolution.
So we have a choice; we can continue to ignore the evidence that our
world seems to be controlled by individuals of such a depraved and
inhuman nature that they cannot really be described as human at all, and
await the inevitable result of entrusting our lives and those of our
children to such sub-humans; or we can wake up to the reality we have
allowed these 'elite' to create for us, rail against it, and in doing
so, begin to live and shape a new reality, a new world, based on truly
human values.