308 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 50 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Life Arts    H4'ed 7/18/11

Robert Moore's Theory About the Structure of the Psyche (Review Essay)

By       (Page 2 of 9 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

(2) will (i.e., rational appetency)

 

(3) the concupiscible appetites (= the desiring part)

 

(4) the irascible appetites (= the spirited part).

 

Vernon J. Bourke of Saint Louis University, who did his doctoral studies of Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy at the University of Toronto, studies the historical emergence of the conceptual construct of the will in his book Will in Western Thought (1964).

 

In an English course that I took from Ong at Saint Louis University in the fall of 1964, I first heard of Bourke's book Will in Western Thought when Ong took the time in class to praise it, as he occasionally praised other books in class. Later on, I studied Bourke's textbook Ethics (1951) in a philosophy course in ethics. (I will mention it below because in it Bourke discusses the four cardinal virtues and the Seven Deadly Sins.)

 

In another English course I took at Saint Louis University in the 1960s, I first heard of Erich Neumann's book The Origins and History of Consciousness (1954), which I read and reread several times over the years. In his big collection of essays titled Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture (1971), Ong sums up Neumann's Jungian account of the eight stages of consciousness in one paragraph-length sentence:

 

"The stages of psychic development as treated by Neumann are successively (1) the infantile undifferentiated self-contained whole symbolized by the uroboros (tail-eater), the serpent with its tail in its mouth, as well as by other circular or global mythological figures, (2) the Great Mother (the impersonal womb from which each human infant, male or female, comes, the impersonal femininity which may swallow him [or her] up again, (3) the separation of the world parents (the principle of opposites, differentiation, possibility of change), (4) the birth of the hero (rise of masculinity and of the personalized ego) with its sequels in (5) the slaying of the mother (fight with the dragon: victory over primal creative but consuming femininity, chthonic forces), and (6) the slaying of the father (symbol of thwarting obstruction of individual achievement, to what is new), (7) the freeing of the captive (liberation of the ego from endogamous kinship libido and emergence of the higher femininity, with woman now as person, anima-sister, related positively to ego consciousness), and finally (8) the transformation (new unity in self-conscious individualization, higher masculinity, expressed primordially in the Osiris myth but today entering new phases with heightened individualism -- or more properly, personalism -- of modern man [and woman]" (pages 10-11).

 

When was the last time you wrote a paragraph-length single sentence as complicated as that one, eh? In any event, Freudians refer to the integration of stage eight as ego-integrity, and Moore refers to it as the optimal self system.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend