196 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 50 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Life Arts    H4'ed 7/18/11

Robert Moore's Theory About the Structure of the Psyche (Review Essay)

By       (Page 5 of 9 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Thomas Farrell
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (22 fans)

For this reason, he refers to the diamond-shaped account of the human psyche.

 

More importantly, he refers to the eight optimal forms as constituting together the optimal self system. What Moore refers to as the optimal self systems has long been referred to by Freudians as ego-integrity. Ego-integrity is the outcome and result of healing archetypal wounding. Without the healing of archetypal wounding, ego-consciousness is diminished in proportion to the extent of our archetypal wounding. The greater the extent of the archetypal wounding, the more diminished our ego-consciousness is.

 

So that's the big picture of the structure of the human psyche according to Moore.

 

But not many among us have an optimal self system. As Anthony Stevens has pointed out, archetypal wounding from early childhood holds us back from being able to access the optimal forms of the eight archetypes of maturity. Archetypal wounding occurs through early childhood traumatization involving abandonment feelings. As Bradshaw points out, abandonment feelings from early childhood traumatization require grief work, usually in the context of working with a psychotherapist. When the grief work is efficacious, the lifting of the grief work is accompanied by archetypal healing of the archetypal wounding.

 

As Jung has pointed out, archetypal healing of archetypal wounding can also occur in another way through a special moment in the interaction of the psychotherapist and the client.

 

Either way, it sounds like psychotherapists should not be unemployed for a long time to come, if people undertake to work toward having an optimal self system. Nevertheless, many people may not be motivated enough to undertake a long-term commitment of psychotherapy. This appears to be the case for those people who rely exclusively on psychotropic prescription medications to try to control their symptoms. Such people appear to be happy to simply keep their symptoms under control, and big pharma makes big bucks from peddling such medications.

 

But what did our human ancestors do to cope with the diminishments of ego-consciousness as the result of archetypal wounding before big pharma was around to peddle prescription medications?

 

Fortunately for the human race, ego-integrity is not exactly the same as moral integrity, and vice versa. Even when we understand that we have not yet achieved ego-integrity, we can cultivate our own personal moral integrity. As Bourke sums up the approach advanced by Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy in his textbook titled Ethics (1951), we can cultivate our own personal moral integrity by cultivating the four cardinal virtues and by working to avoid as much as we possibly can the Seven Deadly Sins. As I will explain momentarily, we can use the four cardinal virtues and the Seven Deadly Sins as ways to help us operationalize Moore's thought regarding the archetypes of maturity.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Celebrating Walter J. Ong's Thought (REVIEW ESSAY)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend